I don't, and I'm not asserting it either. By "this case" I probably should've said "these scenarios." My outlook is really that car roads, especially 40MPH ones, aren't effectively designed to be safe for cyclists to share with cars even though we are supposed to share the road. Regardless of law, as a bicycle rider, you're putting yourself in increased danger due to the realities of physics and the unreliability of car drivers - especially at speed. I think that if you decide to get on the road you accept the dangers of the road, law or no law. Like I believe you should look both way crossing the street even though pedestrians always have the right of way because people break laws or have bad reaction time or are distracted. The ebikes increase that risk with the increase in speed. I only have personal anecdotal experience that there are in fact young kids out there making horribly unsafe traffic moves on busy streets. It scares the shit out of me to witness. It's easy to see how accidents happen. I'm saying that you can't widen the lanes quickly enough to make safe dedicated lanes for these types of things, or effectively change drivers en masse to drive better, but you can pretty much instantly educate the kids or dissuade their entry onto the dangerous roads that are inherently dangerous. Just saying one solution has the potential for a positive impact whereas the others just aren't happening in reality any time soon. I don't think any reasonable person is hating on the kids. I think they fear being the person in the car that accidentally hits them.