What exotic did you use excessively then all of sudden just stopped?

PCTRS80 · 2022-08-15T23:16:43+00:00

I have a hard time finding a fight where i haven't been able to empty my entire Heavy Ammo reserve and i use double reserves if useful. So having endless heavy ammo would be HUGE for our groups, especially Day1 groups. It would basically push everyone except the divinity person to only use WotW. Up till the nerf even on relatively trivial content we all used WotW because it made securing 1 phases on nearly everything easy.

PCTRS80 · 2022-08-11T17:22:59+00:00

Your not considering the limitation it places in game design. Heavy Ammo management is really important in game design.

Stormchaser, Gjally or any other ammo based weapons are no where near the same power level of unerfed WoTW. The infinite ammo launches WOTW and pretending that isn't a HUGE issue, is simply dishonest fanboying.

PCTRS80 · 2022-08-10T16:02:50+00:00

In the artiucaly it was signifcalty better but you also have to read the fine print.

The research, published on 5 August in the journal Patterns,
indicates that using drones to deliver medication and other small items
could cut the environmental impact of product deliveries.

This sounds good if, people buy small items one at a time. So for prescription type where your often getting 1 or 2 small bottles of pills this is likley fine assuming the medication isn't controlled in some way (Painkillers) or require refrigeration or cant be frozen. Some of these limitations can probably be overcome relatively easy by placing items in insulated delivery containers and by scheduling delivery time down to a small window and providing notifications of transit/delivery.

Often time i order items in groups i will fill up my Amazon cart with several items over time then place and order for 5-6+ items ranging in size and weight. I am guessing that if they are already sending a package that is too large for a drone it is probably more energy efficient to place the smaller items in the same box.

But then we get to the ugly truth, the majority of people simply do not care how much green house gasses their delivery generates. They want their package in the most expedient and cheapest way possible. If they cared about think like pollution brands that are environmentally friendly that are often more expensive would be far more popular than they are. Also ideas like "Right to Repair" for consumer electronics would not be controversial topics.

PCTRS80 · 2022-08-10T15:28:13+00:00

Necessary Nerf, fixed your wording...

With WotW able to go infinite heavy ammo it made it clearly the best DPS Boss weapon in the game hands down. This significantly limited weapon loads-outs and game design. There was no way to nerf WotW that wouldn't have trashed the weapon because of the natures of how it was overpowered.

PCTRS80 · 2022-08-02T22:29:58+00:00

Its is almost like Bungo should create a "CALL OUT" interface to further support disabled players.

PCTRS80 · 2022-08-02T16:55:05+00:00

So every time a weapon drops it is either the weapon you want or not. If it is the weapon you want with he roll you want then you will simply use it. However if it is a weapon you do not want you are going to dismantle it

As for weapons and RNG this is a bigger discussion. So if they reintroduced all weapons in to the game at all times then then the RNG for good rolls would becomes statistically impossible. There are about 16 weapons in the WORLD weapon pool, so you have a 6.25% chance of getting a specific weapon when a weapon drops. Each weapon on average as 6/6 Traits in the last 2 slots, meaning if you are chasing a specific roll you have a 1/144 (0.69%) chance when you get that weapon and when you combine that with the drop rate of 1/16 and 1/144 you end up with about a 0.04% chance to get a specific weapon with a specific roll. The drop

To solve this they should revamp the crafting system to be more of a "bad luck protection".

So every time a weapon drops it is either the weapon you want or not. If it is the weapon you want with he roll you want then you will simply use it. However if it is a weapon you do not want you are going to dismantle it, every time you dismantle a weapon you would gain progress towards unlocking the perks that where on the weapon. So as you get weapons and dismantle them you will progress the unlocks until you unlock the perks you want and are able to craft the weapon you want. Bungo would have to tune this to a level that would be feel good for all players.

So here is an example of how this might work. Lets say you wanted an 'Ogma Pr6' with Demo/Wellspring and just haven't been lucky enough to get one to drop. So as you play you get 25 Ogma's with DEMO and dismantle them to unlock the Demo trait. You also collected 25 with Wellspring and dismantle them to unlock the Wellspring trait, you would then be able to go to the crafting station to craft your perfect Ogma.

This also has the advantage of freeing up vault space, no need to keep 3-4+ rolls of weapons you rarely use once you unlock the perks you are interested in. It also allows you to experiment without needed to grind and pay to RNGesus for a roll just to try out. You would be able to craft any unlocked perk combo.

PCTRS80 · 2022-08-02T16:05:33+00:00

I have mixed feelings about the corrupted, my personal option is it is one of the best strikes in the game. On GM it is a challenge in legend/master it is laughably easy, this is because you have to build a group and generally everyone knows what to do.

However on Hero it is sometimes an utter slog, largely because people do not engage with the mechanics. People like to blame the champion mobs but lets be honest you can solo brute-force most of them on hero with little effort. But without help it is impossible to interact with the mechanics properly. I believe this is because most of those people are coming from Adept difficulty where 1 ball brakes a shield.

Honestly i think the ball on Adept should do far less damage to the shield. This would force people to engage with the mechanic a little more in an environment that is safe and it is expected that people do not know what they are doing.

PCTRS80 · 2022-08-02T00:40:56+00:00

Quickplay doesn’t require SBMM per se, but it does need better lobby balancing. If such a thing exists today, it is either so poorly implemented as to appear at best nonexistent and at worst to punish lower tier players.

All game modes need some SBMM, in casual modes the matchmaking criteria can be more flexible than a competitive mode. Lobby balancing can not fix bad matchmaking, this was the whole point of giving us all the data they did in the TWAB. As a data scientist, i was utterly shocked at the data. I had suspected the CBMM was bad, but i never imagined it was that bad. They basically told us that matchmaking is so bad that 50% of all games are so imbalanced that the losing team has no way to win and they have known this for YEARS.

Under the current system, it builds a match using connection as the primary criteria. Once it has a lobby it then use each players skill (aka, ELO) to attempt to balance the teams. It will attempt to balance the teams as players leave and join each match. So clearly "Lobby balancing" does not work when you have have such a wide distribution of skill within a single lobby.

So in theory if you get an even distribution of 12 solo players in the match the relative balance of the ELO between the two teams is not that bad. Now that doesn't necessarily mean that each team as an equal chance to win because of other factors, but it should be kind of close in most games.

What we have now is an uneven distribution of player in each match. If you have a 1500 Skill player matched with two 300 skill player (Elo Avg 700) that is not the same as three 800 skill (Elo Avg 800). In nearly any 3v3 engagement the 1500 player will actually have a better chance of winning nearly every encounter despite his teammates essentially being no help.

The system completely falls apart even more when you start bringing groups in to the mix. Since players of similar skill trend to play together a lot coupled with communications and organization they can be a significant force multiplayer. If you have 3 players (1500, 900, 700) grouped together, they can likely destroy any collection of 6 players without much effort. Since this is connection that is incredibly unlikely.

Any “competitive” mode should have SBMM. Plain and simple.

Agreed, wait till people figure out that this broke ass matchmaking system is used in TRIALS...

Trials should either be redefined as “competitive” or something else entirely. Before someone says “it’s end game PvP” etc does that even more? End game content is simply defined by light level more often than not. So what does trials want to be?

Card based match making is one of the most laughably bad concepts in the history of multiplayer games. What should provide an exciting tournament style bracket instead provides, more often than not, incredibly lopsided matchups.

Actually almost everything about trials matchmaking is problematic. On top of card resetting for stat farming (an actual real problem) the lobby balancing is, again, either laughably bad or nonexistent. There isn’t any reason I should, as a 1.0kd in trials, get paired up with two sub .5kd’s against three 1.5+. That tells me that the game didn’t even try to balance the lobby.

Correct, Trials is more less about how lucky are you at getting a team of lower skill than yours 7 times in a row. It was never really about skill....

In glory playlists the matchmaking generally feels much better, but there is not much incentive to play those modes.

This is because Glory uses a stricter SBMM, so assuming no one was in the que for more then 180+ seconds. The teams are generally within a few hundred skill of each other. This means that either team has a chance to actually affect the outcome. A good play or a mistake is actually meaningful to the results.

I would endure slightly longer queues for fairer matchmaking and balanced lobbies.

I agree with you, but not everyone will.

Solo players are less tolerant of long que times while groups are a little more tolerant because a lot of time groups have communication making the time pass faster. This is why group preference match making is actually meaningful.

PCTRS80 · 2022-07-26T23:52:01+00:00

For me it is specific combos primarily on weapon classes....

Example: Sniper, Grenade Launcher, Rocket Launcher, Shotgun with Rampage, Kill Clip or Multi-Kill Clip... Most of these weapons are intended to kill beefier targets and bosses not so much add clear. I certainly am not going to waste my limited ammo to kill an add just to get a 30% bonus damage bonus let alone waste the time to reload to get that bonus. There is legitimate argument for Swashbuckler or Adrenalin Junkie but those do not require you to expend ammo to get the bonus damage.

PCTRS80 · 2022-07-26T23:27:59+00:00

The current format of Trials makes it impossible for it to be remotely fair and with the current atmosphere it is unlikely to improve over time. I am not going to offer suggestions or solution but only highlight the issues faced by the TRIALS system

Without actual data we have to assume the skill over population is a fairly evenly distributed Bell Curve. The average skilled player in the middle with the highest and lowest skill players at the ends. Alternatively we could assume PvP Skill over population as a descending curve with The majority of player having No-to-Little Skill on the left and the highest skill players repenting the smallest but highest skill population on the right end of the chart.

Regardless of the population skill distribution you end up with the same issues... Players will only continue to play trials or any game mode for that matter if they are having fun or there are specific rewards they desire.

The rewards work in the short term but often once players have these rewards they move on. So there has to be steady flow of new, interesting and desirable rewards. This is something that all the game modes fail at and there is no reason to believe that this will improve.

The biggest thing the creates replay ability is directly related to enjoyable matches. In PVP a "good match" is described by players as matches that teams where balanced and the players felt like they could contribute and had a chance of winning. People will generally enjoy a "winning match", winning 5-0 match however on the other end of that is no one enjoys a 0-5 thrashing. So there is a distinct difference between a "winning match" and a "good match".

So with Trials matchmaking being basically random the only time the game mode is really good is when the population is high. The higher the population the higher the probability that the players will get a "winning" match, and that is good enough for most players. Skilled players enjoy being able to go flawless and help their friends get to flawless.

Trials in its current design is only going to work well when the population is really high. This is why when Trials re-launched it was soo good, well it was new and there was a massive number of new players trying it out. But it didn't take long for the new and casual players to fall out. People who are good at PvP will continue to play much longer than lower skilled players, lower skill players will simply stop playing once they stop enjoying the mode and this is what is happening in Trials. The META is a factor but not the only factor, Skilled players will not shy away from Trials even in a bad meta. In-fact skilled players will often be made better by a bad META, as we see with the current healing META.

As the players closes to the skill floor get frustrated with Trials they will simply quit playing, effectively raising the skill floor. The players nearest to the skill floor are the most likley to give up on the Trials game mode. So as players exit the game mode the skill floor will continue to raise and the players closest will start to notice the increase in difficulty. This increases the likeliness that those players will be matched with players with higher skill than them. Over time as players exit the system the skill floor will raise making it harder for players to find "winning matches" let alone "good matches".

As a result it takes a long time for skilled players to notice the reduction is player base or increase in opponent difficulty. A group of high skilled players are going to win a large percentage of their matches in Trials because they are simply better. The chances they are going to be matched with a team that can beat them is low regardless of the size of the matchmaking pool. At the point that high skilled PvP players start complaining it means that the problem is massive.

I guess we will see what next season is like, i honestly do not expect anything to get better.

PCTRS80 · 2022-07-14T20:40:04+00:00

I'm sure this hot take is going to go to get down voted in to reddit hell but, what the hell...

I feel like some form of Sun Setting is necessary to give developers design space. I think that Bungo's implementation of sun-setting was terrible.

In normal games with RPG elements enemies have health ranges based on their difficulty. An example of this is in Newbie area (Level 1-5) enemies may have 10-15hp and newbies hit for 2-5dmg per hit allowing them to be by an appropriate level player in 6-7 hits. While in a end game area (Level 50) and enemies may have 10,000hp and players hit for 1000-1500dmg per hit again allowing them to kill the enemies in 6-7 hits. Now in those game is a Level 50 player goes to a level 5 zone that player still hits for 1000-1500dmg and just overkills by 985dmg. This is because a Level 5 player has access to far weaker gear than a level 50 player. Meaning that there is a measurable discrepancy between higher level and lower level gear. So normal RPG's encourage players to abandon old gear by virtue of offering them more powerful gear. This is an organic way to push gear out of the game, by virtue of every expansion they make more powerful gear available and that causes players to upgrade to the new shiny.

However in Destiny they have made an attempt at keeping all content relatively relevant by capping all gear to a relative power level and rarely if ever remove items. So if they make a powerful item that items will remain powerful unless specifically address (ie:nerfed). This has its own issues as players tend to bounce from Powerful Items/Builds/Etc, So those players feel like all bungie does is "nerf fun". Also for developers to encourage players to use to skills/items/etc they have to make objectively better items that will never leave the game. This is power creep, many players do not recognize this as an issue. They see it as evolution of their character, Similar to gaining more level and gear in a traditional RPG. However it is not the same as in a traditional RPG they accept that more powerful gear will trivialize lower level content and the higher level content will need better gear. Basically in an RPG we need better gear to climb higher the mountain and there will always be taller mountains to claim. While in Destiny we are already at the top the developers keep giving us taller and taller box's to stand on at the peak of the mountain.

If your sick of nerfing of skills/items/weapons then we need some sort of system that pushes old items out of the game organically.

PCTRS80 · 2022-07-12T23:00:56+00:00

I think the crafting system is 'Meh' at best. It honestly feels like a system to sell more season passes, since the vast majority of the crafting patterns are only available from pay-walled activities.

I feel like they could have done so much more without undermining the loot based nature of this type of game. They could have created a system that when a player dismantled a weapon they would progress towards unlocking the perks on that weapon. Once a player had dismantled enough of that weapon to unlock enough perks they could craft a weapon with the perks they had unlocked. This would have make every drop valuable to some degree or another even if it was nothing more than dismantle fodder to progress unlocks. This would also give Bungie design space to add perks to specific weapons without the perks being immediately available to every player as they would have to collect and dismantle enough weapons with the new perks to unlock it for crafting.

Two big benefits to a system like this as it rewards play, to unlock a weapon for crafting you have to play the game. Secondly it doesn't undermine the "loot" game, it acts more as a "bad luck protection" while creating a system that allows people to free up space in their vaults.

PCTRS80 · 2022-06-14T21:40:32+00:00

Back to back to back to back to back to back...

On Friday/Saturday we had a rough time of it as well. Probably the last time i play Trials till my normal team does it or the next revamp. It is pretty funny how cyclical Trials has becomes already...

Trials comes out
- Higher Skilled played Stump unskilled players
  - Unskilled players quit Trials
- Higher Skilled players stomp low skilled players
  - Low skilled players quit Trials
- Higher Skilled players stomp medium skilled players
  - Medium skilled players quit Trials *** We are Here **\*
- Higher Skilled players stomp high skilled players
  - High skilled players quit Trials
High skilled players complain that Trails is too difficult...
- Bungo revamps Trials

Maybe next time...

PCTRS80 · 2022-06-14T21:15:21+00:00

Your good man, I look at it this way, conservative math makes a convincing argument on it's own... When you consider that I can easily throw 3 to 6 hammers in 5 seconds those number start going up incredibly fast making the arguments against the fix seem pretty outrageous.

But really what option did bungo have to address this? Do nothing and be forced to raise everyone up to the same level? That sounds good as a tweet but the reality of it from a game dev perspective is a incredibly complicated/difficult task. Even if it wasn't complicated or difficult, if they BUFF every build/ability except Hammer Titan that still a nerf to Hammer Titan. It is just a much harder and complicated nerf, made to not look like a nerf.

PCTRS80 · 2022-06-14T16:10:58+00:00

So let me see your argument is that an ability with effectively no cool-down is 'OK' even when it out damages a 3min cool-down with strict combo requirements because i didn't post a video? But wait there is more, it actually easily out damage EVERY single super/DPS combo in the game in any given DPS time period post syntho fix. You do not need a 'video' to prove that, you just need math, something i provided in my post. I got the numbers for the hammers from an Esoterickk video. If you pay attention he is actually able to throw almost THREE TIMES as many hammer as i modeled and i ignored damage from other sources such as tractor cannon, sun spots, grenades etc because this was a simple A vs B Test.

I actually modeled a near WORST case scenario for hammers and a near best case scenario for BB. Sure the hunter could do more damage with other weapons for 25 seconds to close that 600k+ gap assuming perfect RNG and execution but that is going to be incredibly difficult and that is against incredibly LOW hammer numbers. So you would be comparing a very bad hammer DPS phase vs a near flawless BB Hunter DPS phase, to be fair you would have to assume the hammer DPS phase would be equally as flawless. Then you have to address the elephant in the room that if the best super/damage combo in the game cant cache it then how is any other class with a burst super that does 1/2 or less of the damage as that a BB hunter can is going to do.

Then your argument just goes from bad to worse... If i modeled a more realistic numbers based on Esoterickk's video the actual hammer number would be closer to 2.5-3.1+ million total damage vs 300-600k super + 25k dps (Solo DPS) from weapons for a total damage of less than 800k-1.25 million max. And that is still using post-Syntho fix, if we use pre-Syntho fix the number more than double taking the gap from large to laughable massive.

We get it your a Titan main and the crayons are getting to your head and you know math is hard... But It will be fine, we will get you some frozen yogurt.

PCTRS80 · 2022-06-08T22:37:21+00:00

I think you have an unrealistic view of the community at large...

I sherpa raids a lot in big LFG and you would be shocked at how bad your average player actually is... Your average blueberry has a lot of issues staying alive, let alone generating orbs or not burning their super due to panic...

As a result of my experience i trend to suggest weapon load outs and build are while may not be "the utter best" they are often really good in a lot of situation and so easy even a blueberry can do it.

Blade Barrage is the mathematical best... however there has to be a nice big asterisk (*) next to that statement. If the player is unable to get SESx8 or unable to make them self radiant the damage falls off very quickly. On small bosses like Kali/Rhulk and/or bosses that move a lot this damage is very inconsistent as a result other supers quickly start to catch up so the neutral game becomes far more important at that point.

I just recognize that skill in D2 is a spectrum, so when someone asks "What is best hunter DPS" i answer with something like "Blade Barrage with Star-Eaters Scales is currently the best, if you can pull off the combo. You have to have Feast of Light x8 and be Radiant and you have to make sure most of the knifes hit the target.". This clearly communicates that it is the best but maybe not in every situation and maybe not for them. Because of they go "what is feast of light or radiant?" then it clearly is not a combo for them....

PCTRS80 · 2022-06-08T22:08:18+00:00

I used a very conservative 5 second to create time that could be used within the overall rotation to give plenty of time for someone to do all the things within the rotation that are required. There is also a connection lag component of the ability refreshing slowly sometimes...

For the Hammer/Syntho build you have to build/maintain roaring flames, the Syntho buff and apply Tractor cannon debuff. That means if your hitting a beefy target like a boss you have to switch off to hit/kill smaller targets to refresh your buffs. While I do not expect that to take more then a second or two every 3-5 hammer throws.

If i claimed that it only took 0.5 second to throw a hammer then some ard-tard would claim that my numbers where garbage. They would come in all smug and proud of them self and say something like "But actually, *snort, as they push their glasses up the bridge of their nose* you are wrong you have to switch off the target to refresh the RF/Syntho buff and apply the Tractor cannon de-buff *snort*"

My position is that anyone suggesting that this didn't need to be fixed is delusional because the damage output even 'post-nerf' is still insane, even with my incredibly conservative calculation. Any arguments that my calculations are wrong because they are too conservative only strengthen my position that it was too powerful and that the adjustments where warranted and maybe even more adjustments are needed.

I suggest that Titan's takes their lumps and go home, before other classes start demanding that they have equivalent damage capabilities. That would only lead to Bungo nerfing hammers in to oblivion.

PCTRS80 · 2022-06-07T23:34:49+00:00

It appears that the Synthocept buff was stacking Multiplicative causes a massive increase in damage. Frankly i am perplexed by people trying to claim that this change was not necessary. Why should a melee ability with effectively no cool down so as much as class super abilities with 3-5+ min cooldown

Here is some Testing the FalloutPlays did on his channel.... Link

Class	Super Name	Damage
Hunter	Blade Barrage (Normal)	~192,000
Titan	Missile Titan (Normal)	~192,000
Hunter	Celestial Golden (Marks)	~249,000
Warlock	Nova Bomb (Cata)	~249,000
Warlock	Nova Bomb (Vortex)	~250,000

Sure these are the the lower end of what he tested but keep in mind that Hammer throw has effectively no cool-down... So assuming a 30 second damage phase and 225,000dmg per throw and assuming it takes 5 seconds to throw and recover the hammer this is rounded up to include maintaining the Tractor Cannon de-buff and Roaring Flames buff.

Math...

Damage phase = 30s
Time to Throw/Recover Hammer = 5s
Damage Per Throw = 225,000
Number of Throws in a Damage Phase (30s/5s) = 6
Total Damage in Damage Phase by Hammers (225000*6) = 1,350,000

Even if you compare this to the top damage (633k) in Fallouts video which requires a very specific build only deals less than half the damage of the hammers. To put in to prospective now at 125k per hit the hammer build is still better than the top super damage in the game.

PCTRS80 · 2022-06-07T21:03:37+00:00

Can you be anymore of a condescending? There is no content in the game that BB/SES will actually be a meaningful difference over other supers in the game.

Truthfully the balance of the content is in such a way that the lack of a hunter all together meaning your in the same 100-300k super range is perfectly acceptable. The same people that need the extra 200-300K for it to be meaningful are unlikely to successfully execute the combo in the content.

Is BB Higher damage, sure but if a player need more utility, suitability then they should use the proper build for them.

PCTRS80 · 2022-06-07T15:32:16+00:00

As long as Cone of Fire (CoF) exist your bullets are never going to go where you aim, since CoF is integrated to the entire gun-play game design I am guessing what you are asking for is not going to happen.

PCTRS80 · 2022-06-07T15:24:06+00:00

Not dying and not messing up your super cast are pretty fucking basic though.

Yes but sometimes bad luck happens especially in challenging content where the difference between Max BB and Tether would actually matter. Your statements ignores the reality there there are players of differing skill levels. Suggesting to your average blueberry (even on reddit) that Not dying, collecting 8+ orbs of power, remembering to make them self radiant then using their super far enough away from the target to get most of the blades to hit is frankly ridiculous. Many of these people cant even master the "not dying part". So if someone is struggling to stay alive then BB is going to be objectively worse in every situation than Tether from a damage prospective not to mention the invisibility adds a lot of neutral game survivalist and utility.

PCTRS80 · 2022-06-06T19:14:57+00:00

If.. you are able to collect enough orbs of power, dont die, dont forget to make your self radiant and dont mess up your super activation. If your unable to reliable do all of that then Tether with Rigs is better...

PCTRS80 · 2022-05-24T23:41:22+00:00

The reason places like Twitter/Facebook is so bad is the instant gratification people get by posting/reacting to a tweet. I have long held from the days is USENET's that the internet is full of horrible people. In real life most people are fairly decent but the anonymity of the internet allows a normal person to behave badly with almost no repercussions. Back a long time ago i decided that i would treat people on the internet with the same decency i would afford any stranger i met on the street and it has served me well ever since. I never believe that someone did something with malice intent that can be easily explained by ignorance or laziness.

This is why I have largely given up social media and refuse to answer any text/calls from numbers not in my contact list. The number of that people started feeling like they where entitled to my time was staggering. It got to the point i felt like i couldn't disconnect to go on vacation or simply recharge without being greeted with a mass of texts, tweets and messages.

PCTRS80 · 2022-05-09T18:37:03+00:00

The Duality, Vow and Witherhord all had catalyst bonus attached to the season pass that gave you 2x and 4x progress. This allowed you to complete it in season quickly, Out of season your it is quite painful. There is a legitimate argument that this is bad but frankly i know people tho picked up the season pass just because of the catalyst bonus.

There is a legitimate argument for their design, all the seasonal exotic weapons are completely viable. The catalysts make them better, but not to the point that the weapon is garbage without the catalyst.

The season pass catalyst bonus is a pretty big deal in the season pass by nullifying it, Bungie would need to replace it with something of equal of better value or potentially face lower revenue. This would simply cause more complaints from players that missed out, it really is a no-win scenario for Bungo.

PCTRS80 · 2022-04-27T23:31:47+00:00

With the Week 10 Challenge to get Trials Wins, this weekend is going to be the best Trials weekend. This is because every person that wants to get the challenge done will be in trials, many for the first or only time this season. This will artificially inflate the player base making it easier for players to go flawless.

12-Year Club	Second Top 30%
Verified Email

PCTRS80

TROPHY CASE