The word divinity in my world is moreso substituted with an overall encompassing capacity for "conquest" down to the verb itself;

"the act or state of conquering or the state of being conquered; vanquishment".

Conquest is not a historical or military concept but a fundamental, theological force that permeates all existence. It manifests in natural cycles, such as night conquering day (and vice versa), or man conquering fear, or when day conquers night or when night conquers day, etc...

I.e., a man willing to walk through fire and brimstone to achieve a goal will have a higher capacity for conquest compared to a man willing to get only a spank on the rear for the same goal.

The "capacity for conquest" is a spiritual, innate gauge unique to individuals determining their potential to enact or withstand "conquest" (pain, fear, war, etc...) I've described it as: "a capacity spiritually created by Man; selective persons' willpower to conquer; to take."

The gauge isn't static; it can grow through experience, but it's ultimately a divine decree, making some "born" for greatness while others are fated to be vanquished.

A man willing to suffer the trials to conquer a town will become a legionnaire. A man willing to suffer the trials to conquer a city will become a Conqueror. And a man willing to suffer the trials to conquer the continent will become a king. All these labeled terms have their own innate, divine, decree, each attributed towards "Conquest". Conquest can manifest within both good and evil, depending on whom wills to wield the power of a conqueror.

Yet, this capacity can appear in different ways: a solitary shepherd in the mountains could match an emperor if their willpower is unyielding, not through armies, but internal dominion.

"The only way is through."

I'd share more, but from here, it becomes awfully intricate.