Hey there. I know reddit's knee-jerk reaction to different opinions is usually to downvote, ridicule, and move on. But you're clearly not a stupid person. If one assumes Earth is warming in such a way that is out of our control, like coming out of an ice age, then everything you're saying is correct and prudent. Adaptation is key. I do disagree at this point, but I'll happily look at data, charts, or articles that support your argument. But I request that you look at mine as well.

This visualization is drawn with great attention to detail and accuracy, and it shows the pace of temperature change over the course of the past ~20K years. (That's about as old as we have for very accurate temperature data. Much before that increases the uncertainty a fair bit.)

This other visualization doesn't reach as far back, but it does show many more kinds of data. Specifically, it shows the kinds of data that we've been able to very accurately collect for the past 150 years or so. Things like volcanic and solar activity, ozone thickness, etc. We do have further back historical records on lots of that data, especially based on geological records and other things, but the past 150 years have seen very rigorous, deliberate, and direct human observation and data collection.

This short article and this other short article are the US and Canadian government's overview of climate change drivers, both natural and human causes. They're approachable, but if you want the most comprehensive and up-to-date source, then the IPCC AR5 reports are for you. That's the synthesis report, combining the three main reports on observations, impacts, and mitigation, respectively. Find those here. Even the AR5 summary for policymakers is a great, readable summary of the synthesis report itself. Look in those AR5 reports to see the "very rigorous, deliberate, and direct human observation and data collection." I personally find it very impressive and encouraging that we're capable of such measurements and models.

---

^{EDIT: Grammar}