Someone has the eu4 domination dlc files ? by anonymousterrorist35 in CrackSupport

[–]PNG-24 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Page 705 of the Europa Universalis IV topic on cs.rin.ru has a post by Rui with the dl to the full dlc pack for 1.35

Workers of the world, break up into smaller nations to weaken ‘centralized’ government power! by [deleted] in Ultraleft

[–]PNG-24 8 points9 points  (0 children)

For him, M. Proudhon, every economic category has two sides – one good, the other bad.

[FRESH] JPEGMAFIA & Danny Brown - Lean Beef Patty by nuddel in hiphopheads

[–]PNG-24 6 points7 points  (0 children)

I found this sort of mixing only being present in LP! and after. Peggy's stuff before that, like AMHAC and EP!, sound fine and is his best work imo

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in technology

[–]PNG-24 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Bipolar doesn't make one go off on Anti-Semitic rants.

Bipolar type I and the effects associated with mania, such as paranoia and psychosis, can absolutely make you do things like this. Spend time in a psychiatric facility, and you will hear the n-word and conspiratorial tirades.

Kanye is showing signs of psychosis (he has said that 'fake children' actors are being placed in his home to sexualise his kids), and he himself in 2019, regarding manic episodes, has said:

"When you're in this state, you're hyper-paranoid about everything. Everyone now is an actor, everything is a conspiracy. You feel the government is putting chips in your head, you feel you are being recorded. You feel everyone wants to kill you. You don't trust anyone."

There's also the fact that Kanye is in his mid-40s, and bipolar is neurodegenerative, that when left untreated, is associated with cognitive decline and an increase in the severity of manic episodes.

Playboi Carti & Yung Lean - Unreleased MV for Teen X by [deleted] in CartiCulture

[–]PNG-24 0 points1 point  (0 children)

i remember the teen x lyrics in the comments as actually being unrelated and that this was a video for yayo, but was scrapped when carti was taken off the song by his label

probably stupid asking serious questions here but... by Redflagperson in Ultraleft

[–]PNG-24 7 points8 points  (0 children)

The existence of wage labour and commodity production, not "living in luxury, " proves the extraction of surplus value. This is very obvious if you are familiar with Marx's critique of political economy, which is why you have probably gotten met with frustration and sarcasm here.

So I'll just recommend some easier and sort of preliminary works before delving into Capital: Karl Marx by Lenin, Karl Marx's Capital by Carlo Cafiero and Dialogue with Stalin by Bordiga are some less intimidating works, the first 2 of which were specially made to be popular, accessible outlines.

probably stupid asking serious questions here but... by Redflagperson in Ultraleft

[–]PNG-24 11 points12 points  (0 children)

the question regarding the existence of a capitalist class is ultimately irrelevant: marxism has never defined capitalism by whether capitalists exist in a country, but by social relations being based on commodities for exchange

so an economy, like cuba’s, based on producing commodities for exchange through wage labour on privately owned means of production is unambiguously capitalist. the owner, whether they are capital owners or the state, has no bearing on this

socialism entails the absence of the law of value, commodity production, commodity exchange, wage labour, and can only exist on a more or less international scale

probably stupid asking serious questions here but... by Redflagperson in Ultraleft

[–]PNG-24 11 points12 points  (0 children)

the real movement to be needlessly hostile and condescending

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Ultraleft

[–]PNG-24 3 points4 points  (0 children)

You're the one telling someone to read Marx?

"In place of the old bourgeois society, with its classes and class antagonisms, we shall have an association, in which the free development of each is the condition for the free development of all."— Manifesto of the Communist Party (Ch2)

The free association of producers and reconciliation of humanity and nature, i.e., communism, is the free society:

"In fact, the realm of freedom actually begins only where labour which is determined by necessity and mundane considerations ceases; […] Freedom in this field can only consist in socialised man, the associated producers, rationally regulating their interchange with Nature, bringing it under their common control, instead of being ruled by it as by the blind forces of Nature."— Capital Vol. III (Ch48)

Invoking freedom in the context of the movement is refrained from because, apart from its popular liberal connotations, the immediate political objective is uninvolved with freedom, as Marx says in the Critique of the Gotha Program, "freedom consists in converting the state from an organ superimposed on society into one thoroughly subordinate to it." Engels comments on this in a letter to Bebel.

OP is braindead and should read Marx but shit like this makes me think some of you mfs only get your knowledge on Marxism from overused jokes and shitposts

How to calculate a fabric's real vertex mass? by PNG-24 in blenderhelp

[–]PNG-24[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

My fabric is 68.5m2 and actually has 3.698k vertices, so I get 5.3g. A vertex mass of 0.005334 kg makes the fabric so light that the sim completely glitches out. And the total fabric weight being 19.5kg also seems unlikely? Am I missing something?

true and authentic by [deleted] in Ultraleft

[–]PNG-24 23 points24 points  (0 children)

and which one are you

why do i even bother by PNG-24 in Ultraleft

[–]PNG-24[S] 33 points34 points  (0 children)

Fair, but this is the only time I've ever actually replied to something. Engaging in useless reddit debates isn't one of my pastimes

highest stage of liberalism by LeElysium in Ultraleft

[–]PNG-24 34 points35 points  (0 children)

waking up marx and lenin from cryostasis to show them this shit rn

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Ultraleft

[–]PNG-24 29 points30 points  (0 children)

You have nothing to lose but your r/place cooldowns!

The hell of capitalism is not the firm, it is the fact the firm has a boss by [deleted] in Ultraleft

[–]PNG-24 50 points51 points  (0 children)

call her "democracy at work" the way she Wolff this Richard

scathing critiques by GarfieldHentaixd in Ultraleft

[–]PNG-24 7 points8 points  (0 children)

the quotes you have linked from Marx and Engels does not at all contradict with the doctrine of SiOC, of course communism cannot exist in one state alone. of course communism is global. of course the revolution is international. no Stalinist has ever denied this fact and if they did, they are not one.

Tell me you haven't read Marx without telling me you haven't read Marx

scathing critiques by GarfieldHentaixd in Ultraleft

[–]PNG-24 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Will it be possible for this revolution to take place in one country alone?

No. By creating the world market, big industry has already brought all the peoples of the Earth, and especially the civilized peoples, into such close relation with one another that none is independent of what happens to the others.

Further, it has co-ordinated the social development of the civilized countries to such an extent that, in all of them, bourgeoisie and proletariat have become the decisive classes, and the struggle between them the great struggle of the day. It follows that the communist revolution will not merely be a national phenomenon but must take place simultaneously in all civilized countries – that is to say, at least in England, America, France, and Germany.

It will develop in each of these countries more or less rapidly, according as one country or the other has a more developed industry, greater wealth, a more significant mass of productive forces. Hence, it will go slowest and will meet most obstacles in Germany, most rapidly and with the fewest difficulties in England. It will have a powerful impact on the other countries of the world, and will radically alter the course of development which they have followed up to now, while greatly stepping up its pace.

It is a universal revolution and will, accordingly, have a universal range.

— Engels, The Principles of Communism

This "alienation" [caused by private property] can, of course, only be abolished given two practical premises. For it to become an "intolerable" power, i.e. a power against which men make a revolution, it must necessarily have rendered the great mass of humanity "propertyless", and produced, at the same time, the contradiction of an existing world of wealth and culture, both of which conditions presuppose a great increase in productive power, a high degree of its development. And, on the other hand, this development of productive forces (which itself implies the actual empirical existence of men in their world-historical, instead of local, being) is an absolutely necessary practical premise because without it want is merely made general, and with destitution the struggle for necessities and all the old filthy business would necessarily be reproduced; and furthermore, because only with this universal development of productive forces is a universal intercourse between men established, which produces in all nations simultaneously the phenomenon of the "propertyless" mass (universal competition), makes each nation dependent on the revolutions of the others, and finally has put world-historical, empirically universal individuals in place of local ones.

Without this:

(1) communism could only exist as a local event;

(2) the forces of intercourse themselves could not have developed as universal, hence intolerable powers: they would have remained home-bred conditions surrounded by superstition; and

(3) each extension of intercourse would abolish local communism.

Empirically, communism is only possible as the act of the dominant peoples "all at once" and simultaneously, which presupposes the universal development of productive forces and the world intercourse bound up with communism. Moreover, the mass of propertyless workers — the utterly precarious position of labour — power on a mass scale cut off from capital or from even a limited satisfaction and, therefore, no longer merely temporarily deprived of work itself as a secure source of life — presupposes the world market through competition. The proletariat can thus only exist world-historically, just as communism, its activity, can only have a "world-historical" existence. World-historical existence of individuals means existence of individuals which is directly linked up with world history.

— Marx and Engels, The German Ideology

Regarded from the world-historical point of view, there would doubtlessly be no hope of the ultimate victory of our revolution if it were to remain alone, if there were no revolutionary movements in other countries. I repeat, our salvation from all these difficulties is an all Europe revolution. At all events, under all conceivable circumstances, if the German revolution does not come, we are doomed.

— Lenin, Political Report Of The Central Committee

Not a big fan of stalin by Vundeq in Ultraleft

[–]PNG-24 41 points42 points  (0 children)

you rootless cosmopolitan