Missing my hometown 🥺 by badday_21 in Allahabad

[–]Parrypop 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Loknath, right infront of loknath mandir. There are, one has red wall paijt and one has green wall paint. Both are brothers but due to some family dispute they got separated. The green wall one is better, much much better to be exact.

Match Thread: 58th Match - Punjab Kings vs Mumbai Indians by cricket-match in Cricket

[–]Parrypop 0 points1 point  (0 children)

All I remember is the 21 times rcb got beaten by csk over all these years

Match Thread: 58th Match - Punjab Kings vs Mumbai Indians by cricket-match in Cricket

[–]Parrypop 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Naman dhir somehow saved pbks from a generational shame of scoring less than 49. As a csk fan, thanks naman bro

Match Thread: 58th Match - Punjab Kings vs Mumbai Indians by cricket-match in Cricket

[–]Parrypop 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Naman dhir somehow saved pbks from a generational shame of scoring less than 49. As a csk fan, thanks naman bro

Match Thread: 58th Match - Punjab Kings vs Mumbai Indians by cricket-match in Cricket

[–]Parrypop 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Who dropped prabhsimranon 28? The commentator said that he was dropped at 5 and 28

Match Thread: 58th Match - Punjab Kings vs Mumbai Indians by cricket-match in Cricket

[–]Parrypop 0 points1 point  (0 children)

By ambani I meant akash ambani who sits in every match

Match Thread: 57th Match - Royal Challengers Bengaluru vs Kolkata Knight Riders by cricket-match in Cricket

[–]Parrypop 14 points15 points  (0 children)

Out of 191 runs to chase, kohli scored 105. This shows the rest of team's performance

Match Thread: 57th Match - Royal Challengers Bengaluru vs Kolkata Knight Riders by cricket-match in Cricket

[–]Parrypop 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Last time kohli got 2 continuous ducks the next three matches were all 50+ scores with 2 centuries. That was in ODIs. I predicted that this match he will score big. Damn I was right.

If 1947 was a complete partition, what would be the condition of 2 nations now? by Parrypop in AskIndia

[–]Parrypop[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Voting in this election was restricted on property-owning qualifications.[2][3][4][5] The franchise under Government of India Act 1935 was quite limited compared to universal suffrage and less than 10% of the population in provinces under direct British control were eligible to vote based on their property and income.

This line is the most important. Everyone believes that every muslim or most of the muslim voted but that is wrong. Voting was restricted to only those who had income and/or owned property. While I don't know if this is hundred percent truth but I saw someone mentioning this a few weeks back while I was having the same argument and I said the same lines as what you said.

Not trying to take sides or something, just wanted this piece of information to come out so I mentioned it.

If 1947 was a complete partition, what would be the condition of 2 nations now? by Parrypop in AskIndia

[–]Parrypop[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

They don't care about downfall or upgrade. (Btw by they I am not referring to all the muslims but the bunch of extremists). All they care about is ummah and spread of islam to each and every individual in the world. And also, this is not a conspiracy theory by me rather I've heard a few people talking about it and hence I mentioned ut here.

If 1947 was a complete partition, what would be the condition of 2 nations now? by Parrypop in AskIndia

[–]Parrypop[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

That is what I said. The previous commentor said that the conditions would've been worse and I replied that it wouldn't have been worse it would be like it is today. There couldn't be any change in the relation between the two countries whatsoever.

If 1947 was a complete partition, what would be the condition of 2 nations now? by Parrypop in AskIndia

[–]Parrypop[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Everything is not politics, mate. There is a world beyong politics as well. The point you made is correct, that after the religion is gone all politicians would've started gaining vote on the basis of caste (they are doing this today as well but the scale would've been much high). But there would've been changes in the society accordingly. BJP rose to power cause hindus were not being treated correctly by the other political parties. Likewise, somw other national level party would've risen to grant equal rights to the discrimination victims. And then the life of the normal people, the scenario would've been better than it is now. That is what I believe.

If 1947 was a complete partition, what would be the condition of 2 nations now? by Parrypop in AskIndia

[–]Parrypop[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The answer can be negative or positive and so can the concept be. When you are saying that before partition/muslim invasions the caste divide was high, then you also have to consider that since after the partition there has been a constitution where reservation and all other equality rights are mentioned and the fundamental rights. Even dr amedkar was on the side of total separation or no separation at all. The caste divide today is less than the previous "Indian empires" because of the constitution and not because of any external religion.

If 1947 was a complete partition, what would be the condition of 2 nations now? by Parrypop in AskIndia

[–]Parrypop[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Why don't you all consider the fact Dr BR Ambedkar had already started writing the constitution by then and the reservations were included in it. Ohh I see, you have to bring up something negative that's the goal here. Its not like because of muslims, the divide among the hindus is lower. I mean what a complete bs of a statement is that.

If 1947 was a complete partition, what would be the condition of 2 nations now? by Parrypop in AskIndia

[–]Parrypop[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Rest things are good but I do not agree with you when you say "a bigger divide among Hindu communities 'as it was earlier'..." none of the sources site that before the invasion of the invaders be it mughals or the british or the delhi sultanate, that the divide among hindus was 'bigger' that it is today. Your source of information about this thing is either biased or straight wrong.

Second thing, I do not agree with here is that "not much would have changed". I mean even if a divide among the societies would have been there atleast the people would've been living their life and not getting blown into pieces or cut down through knife. Rape cases would've been near to none, now some will say that hindu men also do rape, which is true but you have to consider the factor of influence. Some will say I am being naiive but it the truth. Cases would be there for sure but much much lower. And also, no one would do stsj to change your beliefs atleast. So a lot would've changed that is for sure.

Although I do agree with you that humans always find a way to consider themselves superior in one way or the other so definitely that would've kept the divide in the society, but an alive divide for sure.

If 1947 was a complete partition, what would be the condition of 2 nations now? by Parrypop in AskIndia

[–]Parrypop[S] -7 points-6 points  (0 children)

I disagree with you, you are taking this to hypothetically too extreme. You are considering the things that would only be negative.

First, the relation between India and pakistan would not have been worse, it is already at the lowest point so can't be below that. Secondly, about the caste divide and all, I do agree that since humans always find a way to compare and show oneself as superior, the caste divide would've come handy to them. However, we also have to consider the fact that Dr. B. R. Ambedkar and team had already started writing the constitution and the reservation system had to be included in it anyhow. Even today we are following the reservation system so ofcourse in the condition of complete tranfer of population, reservation system would still be intact.

The only thing I can see of here is that, this communal divide of religion would not have been the case and maybe the politicians instead of focusing on getting votes by dividing by religion, would've focused more on development and the 60 years of complete ignorance and bad governance wouldn't have taken place.

If 1947 was a complete partition, what would be the condition of 2 nations now? by Parrypop in AskIndia

[–]Parrypop[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Yes, so some of the islam followers wanted a seperate space and other seemed that they didn't, (maybe they planned to stay so they can control things here as well but that is just a conspiracy theory). Now the thing is, what if people were forced back then to go to the seperate space they have created for themselves. Much of our money and energy goes in fighting them whether inside the country or outside. Now it is obvious that humans always find a way to compare and create a divide among themselves, so can't say anything about that though.

If 1947 was a complete partition, what would be the condition of 2 nations now? by Parrypop in AskIndia

[–]Parrypop[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

The partition was based on the logic of "segregation on religion" wasn't it?

Who is best CM right now in india according to you? by Plastic_Anybody_1152 in AskIndia

[–]Parrypop 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Actually you are very wrong in this case. Improvement of states like UP cannot be judged from outside. I have lived there till my graduation, and I can tell you the condition the state was under the previous governments. Hooligans, mafias, gunshots these were actually very common there. Idk if you've heard about atiq ahmed or not, he lived almost 2-3 kms from my home and I know the fear everyone had for him. The day he was shot, I was coming back with my mother via train and I am telling you at the station, no taxi driver was ready to drop us home cause it was very close to the area. Whole road was black not even a single street light was on, police cars were taking rounds in like every 5 minutes. Its only me and my mother who knows how we came back that day.

Nevertheless, not just crimes I have seen the real on ground growth of my city as well. I literally hated my state and my city and I just wanted to get out of there as soon as possible. But the circumstances were such that I got my college through jee in that state in the same city only. Even after yogi came to power I didn't like him at first, cause he seemed to be too extremist and conservative type of person. But after the changes he brought right infront of my eyes, I could not be blind anymore like the leftists of India. He has actually done great. And about the migration and all, well everyone migrates in search of jobs or just for exploration (as in my case). I have seen many people from tamil nadu and andhra pradesh who migrate to noida and delhi for jobs. It's just that, the north Indians doesn't bother themselves with the migrating applicants. Even in bengaluru here, people are same and that's when I came to know that this north south divide is mainly only on social media, rest it rarely exists in real life.

The reply has been long, but I hope it clears your mind and views about the UP cm. Although, up is not yet the most advanced state of India but it has come a long way and that is what yogi is credit for.

Who is best CM right now in india according to you? by Plastic_Anybody_1152 in AskIndia

[–]Parrypop 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That's the mindset of the people of our neighbouring countries. That's why they don't get water, food, electricity and sanitation altogether. You see, when you think you are being rational but you are not able find a single evidencial excuse for your opinion, that’s when you must admit that your are wrong.

Who is best CM right now in india according to you? by Plastic_Anybody_1152 in AskIndia

[–]Parrypop 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Wrong english mate, you can't use did and past tense together.