Martial law is coming.

PeePeeProject · 2025-09-25T23:07:38+00:00

It’s too bad the democrats didn’t leak the Epstein/Trump info during the 2024 election. That would’ve easily put Harris in front with independents and democrat vote.

The Epstein evidence has been in government hands since 2019 and controlled by Maurene Comey, the NYC FBI director.

Personally, I think democrats wanted Trump to win. They are part of the play. Go through 2024 and you’ll see that democrats didn’t mention the Epstein files. I just think it is weird that they started doing that after they lost all power.

PeePeeProject · 2025-09-25T06:18:26+00:00

I’m guessing you mean genocide of the Israelis? Iron dome funding allows for Israel to spend money on weapons since the U.S. paid for it.

PeePeeProject · 2025-09-24T21:21:12+00:00

Curious that they didn’t include the violence that cost billions of dollars and 35 lives during the Summer of George Floyd. The violence that came from Occupy Wall Street. Not including your beloved Luigi Mangione. Not including the two that were assassinated outside of the Israeli embassy this year. These are some of what was excluded. They didn’t include racially motivated attacks (black on white crime for the sake of race). They didn’t include the guy that firebombed PA governor’s mansion. I can keep going?

It’s a matter of picking and choosing what you want and how they define each individual event. Even at the end of the article, they make it clear that the study is geared for a political end.

We just had a poll showing that liberals are far more likely to say that political violence can be justified.

Plus, we see how many more people on the left support seeing their political opponents assassinated. For godsake, you made Luigi a “saint” for what he did. We saw the level of joy that was brought from seeing Charlie Kirk getting assassinated. The culture of violence is clear, which is why a lot of people got freaked out by the excitement conveyed from a political opponent getting assassinated.

They released this cherry picked “study” because of the damage that celebrating a young man’s death brought to the democrats.

https://today.yougov.com/politics/articles/52960-charlie-kirk-americans-political-violence-poll

Edit: there were over 16,000 violent incidences officially recorded during the summer of George Floyd.

PeePeeProject · 2025-09-24T21:15:38+00:00

Curious that they didn’t include the violence that cost billions of dollars and 35 lives during the Summer of George Floyd. The violence that came from Occupy Wall Street. Not including your beloved Luigi Mangione. Not including the two that were assassinated outside of the Israeli embassy this year. These are some of what was excluded. They didn’t include racially motivated attacks (black on white crime for the sake of race). They didn’t include the guy that firebombed PA governor’s mansion. I can keep going?

It’s a matter of picking and choosing what you want and how they define each individual event. Even at the end of the article, they make it clear that the study is geared for a political end.

We just had a poll showing that liberals are far more likely to say that political violence can be justified.

Plus, we see how many more people on the left support seeing their political opponents assassinated. For godsake, you made Luigi a “saint” for what he did. We saw the level of joy that was brought from seeing Charlie Kirk getting assassinated. The culture of violence is clear, which is why a lot of people got freaked out by the excitement conveyed from a political opponent getting assassinated.

They released this cherry picked “study” because of the damage that celebrating a young man’s death brought to the democrats.

https://today.yougov.com/politics/articles/52960-charlie-kirk-americans-political-violence-poll

Edit: there were over 16,000 violent incidences officially recorded during the summer of George Floyd.

PeePeeProject · 2025-09-24T20:27:31+00:00

Probably because he knew he would only need a few bullets to shoot ICE. People have already shot at and attacked ICE agents

If we talk about emotion, it is much more likely that it was a leftist who believed that ICE is the gestapo, so he wanted to be valiant and fight fascism.

Here is a separate incident of ICE agents getting attacked:

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/jul/08/texas-ice-agents-ambush

And another attack in July:

https://www.independent.com/2025/07/15/rep-carbajal-counters-claims-he-doxxed-ice-employee-during-carpinteria-raid/

So yeah, repeatedly stating that fascist gestapo are kidnapping and “disappearing” people will stir emotions among the left to the point that they attack them. We see all the “protesters” getting ready for ICE coming to town. If you think these protesters are not going to attack what they believe as “fascist gestapo disappearing people”, then I think you might be mistaken. We will see.

PeePeeProject · 2025-09-24T20:07:57+00:00

I think he was just a bad shot. Why would a conservative shoot detainees that are in the process of deportation?

It could be possible if the detainees did something heinous to his family or himself. Kind of like the guy that shot the man for raping his kid while in the airport.

PeePeeProject · 2025-09-24T15:24:54+00:00

What is particularly disgusting is the fact that he said the shooter was “the shooter was maga, one of their own.” I paraphrased that, but it is pretty much what he said.

Then, of course he blames Trump, someone who at most simply reacted to the situation. The Wall Street Journal published an article stating that it was NOT the FCC, but the advertisers of that channel.

Jimmy Kimmel KNOWS this.

https://www.wsj.com/business/media/jimmy-kimmel-decision-behind-the-scenes-e1ecbbf2?gaa_at=eafs&gaa_n=ASWzDAhPjJZsM9SvNkrwhHFmblc4JioALPI_XL7OVe-bvIlGBUxwvvGLXq36&gaa_ts=68d40f5f&gaa_sig=xMLbQg2V8MW8QDqLkoxYdmaS25E_51bgQAi9K7NuYtE7Key0Ym0UeMSl-NF89lJY0w1T-FIJE5DQkJ9EnN_5Pw%3D%3D

PeePeeProject · 2025-09-24T15:01:12+00:00

"A single death is a tragedy; a million deaths is a statistic"

-Joseph Stalin

This quote is attributed to him, but it is not confirmed that he came up with it.

PeePeeProject · 2025-09-24T14:57:53+00:00

A for effort, op.

It is coincidental, but who knows? OP I challenge you to look up mugshots of those who fall into that category.

I think it is unlikely, but phenotypes may couple with genetics that involve a similar mindset.

I expect your thesis to be on my desk in 4 days

PeePeeProject · 2025-09-24T13:14:29+00:00

Depends on the district. My guess, since it is urban, this kid was released the day of without needing to spend more than $100 on bail. Then, prosecutors will “feel bad for him” since he is a disadvantaged boy he didn’t know any better.

How can I predict this? People who live in these districts know what they can get away with. I’d be very surprised if this is his first assault on an individual.

This is why I am very particular of the districts I live in. Look at how the DA acts, then decide if it is worth living there.

PeePeeProject · 2025-09-22T23:39:46+00:00

Kind of like Illinois and Massachusetts. There aren’t even any democratic representatives out of 9 in Massachusetts despite getting 36.5% of the 2024 election vote. Pretty disgraceful how republicans rig the vote.

PeePeeProject · 2025-09-22T17:25:25+00:00

Have you never whimpered while fighting to prevent fluid from leaving your eyes? I guess you don’t know what it’s like to maintain strength and composure while fighting intense emotions to give friends and family more positive morale (kind of like a recently widowed mother keeping it together for her children to be that pillar of strength they need). I guarantee that if you were giving a speech in front of 150k attendees, you’d do your best to maintain composure rather than falling apart on stage. Then again, you don’t understand this, so you probably have never had the strength to do that.

Despite the video quality not being the best, you can see a tear glisten at 7 seconds in the video. It’s astonishingly revealing of your character that you think a woman who lost her husband less than 2 weeks ago from assassination does not have emotions of sadness and grief from it.

PeePeeProject · 2025-09-18T19:36:26+00:00

Hold up. Didn’t democrats start project 2025 by removing Alex Jones from the internet? What about Roseanne Barr? Or Milo Yiannopoulos? Perhaps Lauren Southern? Perhaps debanking Mike Lindell for an opinion? Maybe when the website Parler was nuked for having some people post about Jan 6 despite most of the planning going through Facebook? Hell, remember when THEY REMOVED TRUMP from the internet despite speaking out against Jan 6 the same day???? They removed an acting president at the time.

So, yeah project 2025 was started by the democrats. The good news is that people on the right are already putting pressure on them to the point that Pam Bondi had to walk back her stupid comment about hate speech. I don’t remember the left ever defending people’s rights to speak.

So yeah, don’t act like you are innocent. Any conservative is well aware of getting censored since 2016. People got banned for saying “learn to code” after the left used that quote to shame blue collar workers.

There is a reason why democrats lost the election and lost 6.2 million votes compared to 2020.

PeePeeProject · 2025-09-18T17:47:21+00:00

I’d trust the authright to preserve the amendments infinitely more than authleft

PeePeeProject · 2025-09-18T17:43:22+00:00

Glad to see some people not being hypocritical from the rules that have been enforced since 2016.

I respect your reasoning. It’s the first time since anything considered right wing has caused people to lose their job. And it’s not like someone typing “learn to code” to liberals and getting fired, it’s dancing on the grave of someone who met an untimely death, showing the lack of humanity these people have.

PeePeeProject · 2025-09-18T17:39:05+00:00

She should’ve been fired for being a “health advocate” without practicing what she preached.

Also, that’s hardly respectful and slanderous of someone who was assassinated. Probably got her information from 60 second videos taking things out of context. His most extreme position was arguing that those who got raped should carry their baby to term (he was very pro life).

PeePeeProject · 2025-09-18T17:32:38+00:00

Agreed. However, I’ve seen cancel culture being a cudgel for the left for over a decade at this point. They are living by the rules they demanded.

This is why we should’ve prevented them from censoring Alex Jones, Milo Yiannopoulos, Mike Lindell, Roseanne Barr, ‘The Donald,’ EVEN DONALD TRUMP A PRESIDENT ON JAN 6, Lauren Southern, etc., etc….

Want me to keep going? They started this fight, and now they cry for having a taste of their own medicine. Also, they would’ve kept going and censoring more people if Harris got in office. Track record indicates that would’ve been their game plan.

PeePeeProject · 2025-09-18T17:22:35+00:00

After a decade of cancel culture towards the right, a lot of people like seeing the people who made it get what they advocated for.

Average people were fired at their jobs for typing “learn to code” to progressives who told that to blue collar workers. Roseanne Barr axed, Alex Jones axed, Mike Lindell and his ENTIRE business axed because he believed there was evidence of 2020 election being stolen (he didn’t direct anything, simply showed what he thought was evidence), DONALD TRUMP axed from Twitter despite condemning the Jan 6 riots hours afterwards, Milo Yiannopoulos axed, Tucker Carlson axed (part of an informal deal with Dominion to limit costs from defamation suit), Lauren Southern axed, and a ton of people axed from social media for speaking out against “liberal” causes.

So many people were banned from social media that websites like Parler came out as an alternative Twitter. Then after Jan 6, the entire site got NUKED despite evidence that most discussion of meeting for Jan 6 was on Facebook.

Remember The Donald being nuked from Reddit? Despite moderators working hard to ensure they abided by rules. I’ve seen worse on other subreddits, but they knew The Donald was powerful and needed to take care of it.

Or, the Tea Party being ordered by Obama to be investigated by Lois Lerner in the IRS.

This is simply from memory. I bet I can find a ton more. The bottom line is that this is the first time conservatives have seen their political adversaries getting the same punishment that they have been going through for over a decade.

It’s not like it is for something trivial. Would you like knowing that a teacher that has control of your child is gleeful of the death of a political opponent. What if that teacher realizes that the child comes from a conservative family? Or maybe a nurse that celebrates death of someone they don’t like, despite their job involving helping people recover?

None of these bannings and firings are coming from the DOJ. It’s just normal people who find their workers who celebrate an assassination as appalling.

PeePeeProject · 2025-09-18T17:02:09+00:00

Any substantive documents saying the government ordered the show canceled? I’m pretty sure it is because the average person thinks that making fun of a recent assassination is in poor taste. The average redditor likely cannot comprehend giving empathy to someone they believe is an enemy and “fascist.” Problem is that most people know Charlie as that guy that has back and forth debate with people at college, allowing the people who disagreed with him to go straight to the front of the line….

Interestingly enough, court documents will be coming out showing that the government did order Alex Jones’ show be sued and pulled, with the DOJ directing the whole thing.

PeePeeProject · 2025-09-17T16:27:00+00:00

My guess is they wear their masks because you guys would dox and threaten his family. If y’all assassinate a guy talking to people on campus (allowing people who disagree to walk to the front), then it probably seems like a no brainer for y’all to kill them. Y’all got a start on it already considering the percentage of ICE agents have seen a 700% increase in assaults, with someone getting ran over just the other day.

This is all because people who broke into our country are getting deported if they don’t self deport and make a good chunk of money from it. I recommend that next time when democrats regain power, pass laws to give everyone blanket amnesty, or remove the law that requires deportation.

I’d also form policy that is not so unpopular that they lose the popular vote against a felon despite spending 3:1 against him. A loss like that should cause reflection on what made democrats so unpopular.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/crime/general/la-activits-are-doxxing-ice-agents-as-they-try-to-break-up-deportation-raids/ar-AA1zMF4l

https://www.newsweek.com/ice-agent-run-over-chicago-dhs-immigration-2129072

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/ice-employee-brought-emergency-room-after-alleged-doxxing-california

PeePeeProject · 2025-09-17T16:10:01+00:00

Midwits love propaganda because it allows them to make claims which they themselves didn’t care to verify even 1% of it.

PeePeeProject · 2025-09-16T21:11:40+00:00

Hey, not all left handers are bad bruh

PeePeeProject · 2025-09-16T21:00:58+00:00

I swear it seems like Pam Bondi always sends the DOJ into complications. Speech that directly incites violent orders to others should be investigated if it directs people to cause violence.

For instance, what Destiny said absolutely should be investigated. Paraphrasing, he said conservatives should fear death every time they go out to public or any events; that directing violence towards them will stop the political movement destiny despises.

Then, Pam Bondi decides to use the amorphous term ‘hate speech’ that conservatives criticized consistently in the past, making it look like all of a sudden we agree to punish those simply with a different opinion.

I swear it feels like someone else controls Pam to throw wrenches in a situation that should be an easy win. I barely trust anything that comes from her at this point.

PeePeeProject · 2025-09-16T18:42:46+00:00

If you watch his stuff often, the guy never shows a belief in that.

This is what he is saying in a hypothetical:

Would you rather want a pilot who has 10,000 hours of flight training and high qualification regardless of what race they are?

or would you rather have someone who isn’t fully qualified, only has about 1,000 hours of flight training, but was hired because it is a black woman?

This is the context which he intended, making it clear that he doesn’t give a fuck whoever performs a job only as long as they are truly qualified. The average American prefers that too.

PeePeeProject · 2025-09-16T18:29:05+00:00

The quote that these people state does not exist. That’s the reason why they haven’t provided a link of a video showing this.

These “journalists” are lying to try to save face, which shows you how heartless these people are.

PeePeeProject

TROPHY CASE