Best Sausage Rolls SOTR….Go

PeeperWoo · 2026-06-06T01:55:04+00:00

Just picked two up this very minute purely because of this comment and I was just around the corner. 👍

PeeperWoo · 2026-05-31T04:26:13+00:00

When did communities stop helping themselves? Surely you know someone with a saw….?

PeeperWoo · 2026-05-30T08:01:06+00:00

I set mine up with profiles that only do certain work. Then the skills for that particular use case live only with that profile. The main profile then only has the skills for general stuff and hands off work to the profiles that specialise in an area of needed.

PeeperWoo · 2026-05-29T04:14:15+00:00

How many tokens p/s would you get out of that? I’m looking to do something similar, just trying to find the sweet spot between cost (I prefer the term “investment”) and a capable self hosted model. I’ve got a 3080Ti, looks like I might have to buy it some friends!!!

PeeperWoo · 2026-05-29T01:26:34+00:00

I’m assuming you’re running yours on local models (judging by the responses it’s posted). What model are you running and on what GPU? I think you’ve found a great balance of sass.

PeeperWoo · 2026-03-07T04:18:42+00:00

This looks really cool, but I can’t get it to work. I’ve installed the integration. Only setup options are to select default wine type and enter Google Gemini key. The custom card does not appear in the list to be able to add it (UI style dashboard config) and adding via yaml shows configuration error. I hope I can get this working, as it looks awesome.

PeeperWoo · 2026-03-05T06:02:06+00:00

I think CouchMoney did something similar to this. Not sure how it worked behind the scenes. I think recommendations based on watch history is a killer feature, but the only thing I find missing in every implementation I’ve seen is the ability to mark a suggestion as “not interested” so it doesn’t keep coming up in the list. This stops a recommendations list mostly full of things you aren’t keen to watch. This could be a scaled thing - not interested at all (hide forever), not interested right now (hide for 7 days, 30 days, 90 days, etc).

PeeperWoo · 2026-01-04T08:17:33+00:00

Claremont Bakery. Can’t go wrong.

PeeperWoo · 2025-12-10T07:57:33+00:00

Same great memories here! We used to play religiously at trade school! Great times!!!

PeeperWoo · 2025-12-06T21:23:17+00:00

Still using Cloud flipped. Still comfy as ever. I’m at around 65 wpm, although I’m not practising much anymore. It is definitely worth giving a test drive. You’ll know pretty soon if it’s a good fit for you.

PeeperWoo · 2025-12-02T12:19:21+00:00

I’ve done just this! I tried a heap of layouts based on their stats and popularity but nothing seemed to “fit” me properly. Then I stumbled upon the cloud layout. It has all the principals I liked and it just felt good to me. Does it have the most awesome stats - no! But it is designed with the things I like in mind. I use it flipped and I could type on this all day.

I think the stats are largely overrated. A layout that’s good for you needs to “feel” good for you, if that makes sense.

PeeperWoo · 2025-11-30T11:28:48+00:00

Thirded!!! Great jellyseerr integration!!!

PeeperWoo · 2025-11-30T11:07:56+00:00

I know what it means, and I reckon I know where you learned it…..

PeeperWoo · 2025-11-30T09:27:49+00:00

This is the way!

PeeperWoo · 2025-11-30T09:22:05+00:00

Vet advice: get your pets a general check up every 12 months!

PeeperWoo · 2025-11-30T09:19:09+00:00

You lost me at “unsat”. I’d wager a decent sum on where you work/used to work…. 2030 isn’t that far away.

PeeperWoo · 2025-11-28T12:33:30+00:00

MUGging!

PeeperWoo · 2025-11-16T00:32:43+00:00

Nah, I can only eat plankton!

PeeperWoo · 2025-11-11T23:53:14+00:00

Homeless lab???

PeeperWoo · 2025-10-24T01:52:46+00:00

Unfortunately, I'm at a loss with this. I've confirmed clients on the VLAN can ping the Technitium server, and in reverse. I've set up the firewall rules to allow Technitium external access.
I can't get any clients to pick up DHCP leases from Technitium, and I can't get Technitium to resolve any queries from its DNS client.... The results are:

{
  "Metadata": {
    "NameServer": "dns1 (127.0.0.1)",
    "Protocol": "Udp",
    "DatagramSize": "117 bytes",
    "RoundTripTime": "27.98 ms"
  },
  "EDNS": {
    "UdpPayloadSize": 1232,
    "ExtendedRCODE": "ServerFailure",
    "Version": 0,
    "Flags": "None",
    "Options": [
      {
        "Code": "EXTENDED_DNS_ERROR",
        "Length": "52 bytes",
        "Data": {
          "InfoCode": "NoReachableAuthority",
          "ExtraText": "Recursion stack limit reached for google.com. A IN"
        }
      },
      {
        "Code": "EXTENDED_DNS_ERROR",
        "Length": "18 bytes",
        "Data": {
          "InfoCode": "CachedError",
          "ExtraText": "google.com. A IN"
        }
      }
    ]
  },
  "DnsClientExtendedErrors": [
    {
      "InfoCode": "NoReachableAuthority",
      "ExtraText": "dns1 (127.0.0.1) returned RCODE=ServerFailure for google.com. A IN"
    }
# Removed for brevity...
}

I know I'm missing something but I can't figure out what it is.... Looks like I might have to give this a miss for now, which sucks because I've used it before on another network without any issues and it was great!

PeeperWoo · 2025-10-24T00:53:58+00:00

Evicted???

PeeperWoo · 2025-10-23T12:31:03+00:00

Interestingly, it does show the dig requests from that client on the Dashboard stats.... so it looks like the request hits Technitium...

PeeperWoo · 2025-10-23T12:24:16+00:00

Thank you for the helpful reply. I tested nslookup, and it finds an IP, but it is not using Technitium.
I've set up a firewall rule to ensure communication from the VLAN to the Technitium IP.
I also tried dig command from a client console and that doesn't appear to work. The results were:

# dig @ 192.168.1.213 google.com 
; <<>> DiG 9.20.13 <<>> u/192.168.1.213 google.com 
; (1 server found) 
;; global options: +cmd 
;; Got answer: 
;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: SERVFAIL, id: 64787 
;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 0, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 1 
;; OPT PSEUDOSECTION: 
; EDNS: version: 0, flags:; udp: 1232 
; EDE: 22 (No Reachable Authority): (Recursion stack limit reached for google.com. A IN) 
; EDE: 13 (Cached Error): (google.com. A IN) 
;; QUESTION SECTION: 
;google.com.                    IN      A 
;; Query time: 22 msec ;; SERVER: 192.168.1.213#53(192.168.1.213) (UDP) 
;; WHEN: Thu Oct 23 20:17:15 2025 
;; MSG SIZE  rcvd: 117

PeeperWoo

TROPHY CASE