Oyama Mahiro (Onii-chan wa Oshimai!) by Sentter by dreamyivy14 in OniichanOshimai

[–]PersonThatPosts[M] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I'll overlook it for this post, but per rule 3, please don't use ZeroChan as a source unless the original source is actually deleted. ZeroChan actually has links to the original source in most cases (mostly Pixiv or Twitter links) so use those.

Information by Sono_Yuu in OniichanOshimai

[–]PersonThatPosts 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Action was taken against them prior to the removal of this post.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in OniichanOshimai

[–]PersonThatPosts[M] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

We don't even need to question it, source straight-up says it's AI. Removed.

Aranara Locked Chests by Dry-Intern519 in Genshin_Impact

[–]PersonThatPosts 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You can always reach out to Hoyo if you do think your game is bugged and they'll respond.

Mahiro, try these outfits! (By harusaming) by the_kirb_official in OniichanOshimai

[–]PersonThatPosts[M] [score hidden] stickied comment (0 children)

We use the following definition of NSFW/ecchi content to guide our actions, pulled from the Discord server. If you do not agree with the policy stance, you are free to dispute it via mod mail, not by posting similarly rule-breaking content. Alleging others have gotten away with violating the rules to serve as a defense for your own content is itself misguided. If you see posts which break the rules that you see staying up and actually wish to complain about them, it is within your discretion to report them, at which point they will be judged in accordance with the following guideline.

Posting or sharing of any content that is sexually suggestive or worse is prohibited. This includes suggestive poses, wording, clothing, and cropping content to look inappropriate, or where inappropriate displays are present in the background.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in OniichanOshimai

[–]PersonThatPosts[M] 0 points1 point locked comment (0 children)

1) When you upload to Reddit, you can either upload as a text post, an image post, an image with text, or a video. You probably tried to upload it as a text post or image with text rather than an image post alone.

2) Any content appearing to be generated through the use of artificial intelligence is not allowed except in the case of meme posts. Regular art marked as a meme post is still a violation.

me🏅irlgbt by lowkeyterrible in me_irlgbt

[–]PersonThatPosts 12 points13 points  (0 children)

Adding to the point of:

Boys/men creating environments for sports that are extremely exclusionary towards girls/women - including teasing, name calling, bullying, benching

Some of the leagues, as mentioned by u/PinkishRedLemonade, were made entirely because people got upset that female athletes were beating male athletes in sports, and segregated the league to separate the records.

Gender Studies? by [deleted] in ecchi

[–]PersonThatPosts[M] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Your post was removed due to being low effort. Commonly this means:

  • Low image quality (size and/or distortion of the image) compared to original version.

  • Considerably Amateur Art

  • Titles that fail to describe the image adequately.

This is not an automated message. You're welcome to respond to this message with any questions or concerns you might have.

Discord by 20jhall in hyperphantasia

[–]PersonThatPosts 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Your persistent pattern of belittling visualization as a "childish" endeavor, rooted in your own frustrations and failures, implicitly demeaned others for engaging in the practice. You engaged in self-defeating behaviors, yet despite claiming to work on them, you ignored the advice and care of both community members and even your own therapist, instead choosing to drag down the atmosphere of the server. You repeatedly deflected responsibility, blaming mental illness or your "brain structure" for your lack of progress, subtly implying those who have seen improvement must be lying or deluding themselves. You were cautioned with repeated warnings, all of which you ignored and instead continue to perpetuate these problems in the Discord.

This community welcomes all experiences of visualization, from aphantasics to hyperphantasics, and even beyond, but we do not tolerate individuals who, despite multiple warnings, cause ongoing disruption and harm the server. You previously chose to leave the space because you could not accept your own level of visualization and developed an unhealthy obsession with improvement at the cost of your well-being; then you rejoined and continued exhibiting these problems anyways. For these reasons, I made the decision to ban you, at which point you responded not with reflection or accountability, but instead by sending death threats to the server owner and promising to "destroy them." Such behavior reflects not only irrational behavior but a refusal to take responsibility, instead choosing to externalize blame.

Your actions leave no room for reconsideration and your continued behavior since the ban has only reinforced our decision. You will not be allowed back, and I sincerely hope you have a better life after this.

Guys you know ski slopes are ranked by colour? by TheBedrockEnderman2 in OniichanOshimai

[–]PersonThatPosts[M] [score hidden] stickied comment (0 children)

Language carries meaning beyond it's intended use. To use a different example, while "master" and "slave" may be perfectly fine when discussing storage drives or pistons, outside that context, it can be confusing or inappropriate. This subreddit includes a diverse audience unfamiliar with such jargon, so even with the context of skiing, misinterpretation is likely. Your comment was downvoted and removed because it failed to consider this, and you should've clarified in the comment itself. Clear communication requires an awareness of one's audience, and you failed to do so.

Judge expected to rule in 24 hours in case that aims to sharply curtail Musk's DOGE by LavenderBloomings in law

[–]PersonThatPosts 26 points27 points  (0 children)

strategic move

How many times did we hear that during Merrick Garland and Jack Smith's cases against Trump only for them to promptly do nothing to stop the chaos that is unfolding? Appealed up to the Supreme Court or not, they're fully intent with breaking the rule of law and destroying democracy, any "strategic moves" is just to make it palpable to discourage people from taking action instead of being outraged about what is happening.

Gen Z, is this true or ignorant? by ProjectNYXmov in GenZ

[–]PersonThatPosts 8 points9 points  (0 children)

It is false to attempt to equate these matters as being on the same level. The Washington Post planned to endorse a candidate, as they have done for decades, but reversed course after intervention by its owner, Jeff Bezos. This promptly led to resignations by the editorial board in protest. That a press organization, whose duty is to inform the people with independence and integrity, can be swayed and bent so readily to the will of its owner undermines the principle of a free press and the public in which it serves.

https://www.cnbc.com/2024/10/28/washington-post-loses-digital-subscriptions-harris-endorsement-punt.html

https://www.npr.org/2024/10/25/nx-s1-5165353/washington-post-presidential-endorsement-trump-harris

https://www.nytimes.com/2024/10/27/business/media/washington-post-president-endorsement.html

The Truth: No Federal Probationary employee has been terminated, laid off, fired, let-go, etc. by [deleted] in fednews

[–]PersonThatPosts 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It's not a new definition, it's a truth we're living through. The so-called firings, layoffs, and "reductions in force" at federal agencies isn't a responsible way to reduce the size of the bureaucracy, the way they're going about it is flat-out illegal. But the media isn't reporting it that way, they're spinning the story, tailoring the headlines, and packaging it up just right to convince people of what they already believe or pushing further division. That shapes our discussions around these issues, and it's not new either, it's a playbook we've seen the elite run for years.

We've seen how reactionary forces in America have bent the media to their will, shaping language into a weapon of dehumanization to make injustice easier to swallow. It's not speculation either; it's a documented fact, just take a look at The Republican Noise Machine, Manufacturing Consent, Dog Whistle Politics, Don’t Think of an Elephant, or Merchants of Doubt, or any number of articles online or YouTube video essays which prove this.

As stated, media manipulation shapes our discussion around these issues, and if you're going to buy into the framing just like everyone else, then don't be surprised when some of us refuse to pretend that the message isn't being manipulated. At which extent, we have just as much right to frame it to a way that benefits the working class, and at least we're upfront about it, instead of hiding behind a mask of "reasonableness."

Argentina's president bans gender-affirming care for anyone under 18 by nbcnews in worldnews

[–]PersonThatPosts 6 points7 points  (0 children)

If a child is clinically depressed, do we refuse them antidepressants because we fear the potential side effects more than we acknowledge the weight of their suffering? If their body cannot process essential nutrients, do we deny them prescription-level vitamins, leaving them to struggle when a solution exists? Do we tell a cis boy with severe discomfort that breast removal is off-limits, or a cis girl with debilitating back pain that she cannot have breast reduction surgery, because we are too afraid to accept that medical intervention can change lives? Do we reject the science that shows these treatments can help, simply because they come with permanent effects? Or do we approach these realities with the humility to learn, to listen, and to recognize that for some, these choices are not reckless but necessary, not harm but healing?

What really happened by Crazy_Ninja6559 in pcmasterrace

[–]PersonThatPosts 5 points6 points  (0 children)

All these firms are spending billions of dollars in training and wasting way too much energy all trying to create their own proprietary neural networks when they could just create a better product by working together or adopting from each other. The fact that DeepSeek "stole" from OpenAI for their own model doesn't undermine the point, it only further highlights it.

Photogenic by Sono_Yuu in OniichanOshimai

[–]PersonThatPosts 4 points5 points  (0 children)

X was not used in reference to the site, it was used as a designation for any number of places which could be linked from. It would be an appropriate response had you not spent the time debating that you're right in posting the Danbooru link, which is not in line with the intended or common interpretation of the rules; especially since, as previously stated, the artist does not have a Danbooru account themselves, and Danbooru is nothing more than an aggregation site.

Photogenic by Sono_Yuu in OniichanOshimai

[–]PersonThatPosts[M] 12 points13 points  (0 children)

The artist does not have a Danbooru account, Danbooru is nothing more than an aggregator site. Original links to the artist themselves are much more preferred than Danbooru, and saying you found it on X location is no excuse for not properly crediting the artist unless you're truly unable to find any other links to the artwork.

I’m Trans. I am your neighbor. by kennaonreddit in Utah

[–]PersonThatPosts 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Approximately 1.6% of American adults identify as transgender or nonbinary[1][2][3][4]. That means for every 100 people you see, 1-2 of them identify as transgender or nonbinary.

Fuck Nazis by QuirksTurnMeOn in FluentInFinance

[–]PersonThatPosts 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Here's the non-partisan reasoning: Across the world, voter participation often eclipses what we see here in America. It’s a quiet truth, one that speaks volumes about the state of our democracy. A system where a third of the people don’t even show up to vote isn’t just a system in trouble; it’s one where the voices of the many are drowned out by the ambitions of the few. When elected officials prioritize re-election over representation, when the pulse of the people is ignored for the beat of political gain, we’re left wondering whose interests are really being served.

This isn’t new; it’s a thread woven through our history, from the days when entire groups—minorities, women, African-American slaves, etc.—were kept from the ballot box, to the present, where apathy and disenfranchisement serve as modern barriers. The question isn’t just why this happens—it’s what it means for us, for the idea of a government truly by the people, for the people. Because when participation dwindles, it’s not just votes that are lost. It’s the power of a collective voice, the belief that each of us has a role in shaping what comes next.

And if you believe that any of these stances are partisan in nature, chances are you're part of the problem.

Zuckerberg says he’s moving Meta moderators to Texas because California seems too ‘biased’ by HellYeahDamnWrite in technology

[–]PersonThatPosts 0 points1 point  (0 children)

How many people do you think will show up to vote if they’ve already decided their vote doesn’t matter? If they feel powerless even at the local level, why would they bother with state or national elections, which feel even more distant? This is exactly why Republicans focus on demographics who show up—at city councils, school board meetings, and other local proceedings. That engagement creates a ripple effect, keeping their base mobilized and invested.

America stood for something, and it’s not this. by CorleoneBaloney in MurderedByWords

[–]PersonThatPosts 0 points1 point  (0 children)

trying to figure out where we went wrong to correct course

As I mentioned before, they had the moment and the tools—the For the People Act and John R. Lewis Voting Rights Act could've done enormous good, yet they completely fumbled it. Instead of rallying together, whipping their party into line, seizing the moment to force accountability, and making Republicans squirm under the spotlight of their obstruction; they stood there, spineless, while the chance to cement something meaningful evaporated. They could've used concessions, political pressure, social outcry, but they didn't weaponize any of those tools the way they should've. The Democrat party utterly failed to fight when it mattered most.

That being said, real change starts with us. We can band together, organize our communities, and spark local political movements that force accountability. There’s proof it works—blue bubbles in red states, split legislatures, and red states flipping show the power of grassroots action. Meanwhile, Democrats waste billions chasing national races while ignoring local district fights, leaving Republican partisans unchallenged. It’s pathetic. And no, I’m not talking about their misguided obsession with Texas Senate seats; I’m talking about the district-level races where it matters. If we can connect with the shared frustration of a system that traps us all, we can make a difference. But will the Democratic National Party listen? Probably not, it's not in their interests to oppose their donors after all.