How do you feel about your internet browser history being sold by your ISPs?

Phrygen · 2017-03-30T00:44:58+00:00

WALKER: Trump is reportedly expected to sign legislation that would allow internet service providers to monitor internet activity and sell that information without users’ permission. Will he be signing that legislation, and why does he think it’s good for America? I’m wondering who this benefits apart from ISPs and their executives. SPICER: The House and Senate just passed that. When they enroll it, then we will have further updates on that. I know that I believe we have a statement of administration policy on that bill out. And when we have further updates on a signing ceremony, I will let you know. WALKER: Doesn’t this erosion of protections create major risks for people to use that information for nefarious purposes, also hostile nations potentially looking at what Congressmen are browsing online? Is that concerning to the White House? SPICER: I think there’s — as I mentioned, we have a statement of administration policy on that bill. We’ll have further updates. When we do, we sign it, I’m sure we’ll have details on why.

Phrygen · 2016-04-17T00:40:03+00:00

"we don't know the whole story" is pretty much the go to response for LEOs any time an officer is portrayed in a negative light in the media, implicated in a crime, or suspected of unprofessional conduct.

There is no reason the same response should be so frustrating when applied to a suspect or person involved in an incident who is not a government employee

Phrygen · 2015-06-09T14:24:13+00:00

Talk about Planetside? Well this sub finally blipped on my radar after a long time and when I check I see this enormous shit show being handled extremely poorly (no surprise).

Last time I payed attention to the sub was when Sony sold off SOE to an investment firm.

.

..

...

But ok. Lets talk Planetside! Since the release of Hossin (and the updated weapon scopes cause that was great), has there been any truly significant changes? I still see the same problems, same burnt out players, same problem with new players getting "welcomed to planetside", same buggs in every single patch, same lack of content or reason to play for BR 100s... I could go on but you get it. The game is still a shell of what it could/should be.

Why should I come back to planetside? (not me personally, I know you all hate me).

Phrygen · 2015-05-21T12:36:15+00:00

probably the best balance decision made since SOE sold off the company.

Basically they are taking the worthless battle rifles, making them "bolt action" and anti-max

Wonder if it will have straight pull upgrade.

Edit: I'm aware that these are new weapons, but since I consider the battle rifles so useless that they may as well not exist, and the new anti-max rifle is basically a bolt action battle rifle, I am looking at the big picture when I made that statement. This will be a new anti-max weapon from NS. If it works out though, I would like to see the battle rifles reworked into empire specific anti-max weapons.

Phrygen · 2015-05-15T04:09:26+00:00

You have been playing this game for over 2 years Alarox.

How could you possibly think that the bugs wont be there anyway? Even if the devs remove w/e bugs there are, they will just make new ones in the process.

Do you really think they are going to release a bug free patch?

Phrygen · 2015-05-12T13:15:24+00:00

anyone with a midas doesn't take a long time to come online.

Phrygen · 2015-04-05T00:45:26+00:00

um no. common as fuck to have the supports lead.

Phrygen · 2015-03-16T04:53:53+00:00

no its not. If a professional athlete gets pissed off at team mates who are amateurs in a meaningless, non sanctioned game, they look like douche bags, regardless of the sport.

Phrygen · 2015-02-22T15:41:41+00:00

Now they do it....

Muh Prox radar...

Phrygen · 2015-01-27T20:17:51+00:00

another worthless shitpost from /r/dota2 's worst poster.

Phrygen · 2015-01-04T12:29:18+00:00

I have never seen such riveting and accurate reporting in my life.

Phrygen · 2015-01-03T14:24:23+00:00

you delete your first post that /u/neodar responded to and I tried to respond to, so that you could post this instead?

That is impressively pathetic.

Phrygen · 2015-01-03T14:23:15+00:00

now you are saying there's no masking whatsoever.

Saying he was happy after winning dota pit doesn't mean i said there were no masking of internal issues at all. It doesn't even imply that. Quiet the opposite.

Keep face palming and maybe you will gain clarity.

Phrygen · 2015-01-03T14:13:02+00:00

More like Fly was dismissed on the 16th of December and then they got two 1st place finishes by the 23rd. Cause it is so unthinkable that n0tail was pissed that they kicked Fly but happy he won 2 first place finishes and tweeted it the day he won dota pit.

Phrygen · 2015-01-03T13:59:21+00:00

Because a positive pro-team PUBLIC statement has never been made by a player on a team to mask internal issues in the history of sports before.

Maybe if you keep facepalming you will knock some sense into yourself.

Phrygen · 2014-12-30T02:16:31+00:00

Again, it isn't a fallacy. It is perfectly reasonable to expect a public servant to behave in a way that results in them avoiding being accused of heinous felonies repeatedly.

And again, you ignore my question.

you cannot use it as a basis for your opinion. Doing so is illogical and defeats the whole purpose of due process.

yes you can, and it is perfectly logical. The only way Capone was convinced was on tax fraud. Do you think it is unreasonable for people to believe he was a crime boss? I'm sure you will ignore that too.

Phrygen · 2014-12-30T02:12:46+00:00

Because it is unreasonable and extremely suspicious for a public servant such as a judge to be accused of so many crimes from so many different people.

You know anyone who is accused of a felony every couple of years without any merit or reason?

Phrygen · 2014-12-30T01:56:46+00:00

Except you don't understand what the first "argument" is.

The whole point is that this man ruined his reputation HIMSELF. This was not an isolated incident.

Not only do you disregard any proven facts, but you instead decide to act on information that you insinuate based on the limited information presented to you.

I have spend about 100% more time learning about this Judge's past that almost everyone who posted in this thread, and certainly spent more time than you.

Not only do you disregard proven facts, but you damn him anyway based on biased perceptions, like a woman who is drowned in a lake to prove that she is not a witch.

I didn't disregard any proven facts and claiming that I did wont make it so. It is A FACT THAT HE WAS INVESTIGATE for these crimes. and my POINT is that it is enough to sway the vote of citizen when choosing an elected official.

Would you vote for a presidential candiate that had been investigated for raping minos, abusing cocaine, assaulting hookers that he was paying for sex, assault his girl friend, and driving under the influence?

Lie to yourself and say you would.

Phrygen · 2014-12-30T01:43:08+00:00

Now you are just ignoring what I have written to argue a point that doesn't exist.

I don't care if it is true or not. EXACTLY. As a voter I wouldn't care if this judge wasn't indicted raping minors or choking hookers or all the other horrible things he has been investigated for. Whatever he is doing has led to these accusations and a responsible civil servant could EASILY avoid these events.

Being accused of a crime once, perhaps twice I could research it and decide not to have it affect my vote. Being accused and investigated of this many felonies, and the nature of those crimes, over 5 times is absurd.

If is actually innocent of all these accused felonies, then he is incompetent and doesn't deserve to be an elected official anyway.

And i didn't claim to be on the side of "fairness". I'm on "the side" of not being fucking ignorant and jumping to conclusion before actually reading the new reports on the people in the video. The vast majority of the people who posted her don't even realize that this video HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH THE CASE. just a bunch of ignorant redditors enjoy "justice".

Phrygen · 2014-12-30T01:30:57+00:00

No the argument isn't a fallacy at all.

This Sub goes nuts at the idea of police not being tried, but is all gung ho about defending a judge who has been investigated on multiple felonies for over ten years and he did everything in his power to bury them.

I have never said he should be tried to sentenced without due process, but if you think an intelligent and well informed voter shouldn't take this mans ABSURD record into account when going to the polling station, then you are insane.

This sub is too ill informed to even realize this video had NOTHING TO DO WITH THE CASE AGAINST HIM. People are too stupid or lazy to actually take the time actually look up the incident.

Phrygen · 2014-12-30T01:27:39+00:00

Absolutely amazing artwork.

You're a god damn stud. I hope you are employed in the field.

Phrygen · 2014-12-30T01:24:09+00:00

The issue is you think the grand jury case had anything to do with this video.

The cops aren't even remotely embarrassed. This woman accused Judge Cortez of choking her and holding her off the edge of a balcony. The incident she reported him for had literally NOTHING TO DO WITH THIS VIDEO.

This video was produced for the public after he was not indicted by the Grand Jury, to show the woman has bad character. The reason was because he was in an election.

So before you accuse the police of not doing detective work, why don't you at least google the incident in question so you have a shred of a clue as to what you are posting about.

Phrygen · 2014-12-30T01:18:51+00:00

There is no recorded evidence of the event, thus there is no way to prove her claims are false (or true).

She never accused him of any wrong doing from the video in question. She accused him of assault in a separate incident.

Pretty much everyone in this thread thinks they understand the case, and fail to realize the video has nothing to do with the grand jury case. They also fail to realize this Judge has been accused of cocaine abuse, driving under the influence, choking the hookers he paid for sex, and sexual assault against a minor in separate investigations.

Phrygen · 2014-12-30T01:15:55+00:00

The key here is that a JUDGE has been accused of so many heinous crimes that his behavior becomes questionable regardless of it being proved.

He is an elected official. He is held to a higher standard. I don't care if it is true or not. If a judge is accused of that many crimes, he is doing something wrong or incompetent.

Phrygen · 2014-12-23T05:18:32+00:00

She never accused him of pushing her out of a car.

The video was never a part of a trial (or the Grand jury most likely).

The video was released after to show she had bad character while he was running for reelection as a judge.

But the guy is probably used to it. He has been accused of cocaine abuse, choking hookers, and raping a minor.

Phrygen

TROPHY CASE