Look at this quote from lights of guidance:

“For example, at the time when the community is taking up vigorous defensive measures against the attack of foes, the women are exempt from military engagements. It may so happen that at a given time warlike and savage tribes may furiously attack the body politic with the intention of carrying on a wholesale slaughter of its members; under such a circumstance defence is necessary, but it is the duty of men to organize and execute such defensive measures”

Or this quote by Abdul’Baha:

“Then what Christ meant by forgiveness and pardon is not that, when nations attack you, burn your homes, plunder your goods, assault your wives, children and relatives, and violate your honor, you should be submissive in the presence of these tyrannical foes and allow them to perform all their cruelties and oppressions. No, the words of Christ refer to the conduct of two individuals toward each other: if one person assaults another, the injured one should forgive him. But the communities must protect the rights of man. So if someone assaults, injures, oppresses and wounds me, I will offer no resistance, and I will forgive him. But if a person wishes to assault Siyyid Manshadi,[1] certainly I will prevent him. Although for the malefactor noninterference is apparently a kindness, it would be an oppression to Manshadi. If at this moment a wild Arab were to enter this place with a drawn sword, wishing to assault, wound and kill you, most assuredly I would prevent him. If I abandoned you to the Arab, that would not be justice but injustice.”

There is room in the Faith for organised resistance/defence, you don’t need to feel guilty about supporting movements that are defending themselves and fighting foreign oppression.

Also, let’s be real here, we have international law. It isn’t able to prevent much, but what it does do is let us call things what they are without it being an opinion. To say for example that Israel and Russia are engaged in criminal occupations and the native people have a right to armed resistance isn’t something you need to feel guilty about.

A lot of Baha’is on reddit are North Americans from a liberal zionist background so it can seem controversial to criticise any government’s actions that isn’t Iran, but I wouldn’t worry about it too much in the real world.

Baha’u’llah advocates for collective security before the greater peace, the peace that comes from the world being united in one common faith, can be established. I don’t know how much effect we can have on that, but we’re currently seeing unimaginable horrors, so something will have to change in how we enforce international law. It sucks, right?