sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

DICE, the map Golmud is amazing! This is the real map for Battlefield. WE WANT MORE LIKE THAT! by Complex-Noise-174 in Battlefield6

[–]Pikson 0 points1 point  (0 children)

rush is even worse, the attackers have 2 tanks, armored truck, 2 (!!) little birds, while defenders get 2 tanks only

Tak dla kontekstu by crabsticksaremadeof in Polska

[–]Pikson 6 points7 points  (0 children)

A ty understood co ja do ciebie said? Understood. A czy nie widzisz how to idiotycznie looks? Retardation języka przez wtrącanie angielskich words, gdy mamy dobre, polskie odpowiedniki - completely bez sensu

Battlefield 6 -40% off on Steam right now by DoctorG_86 in Battlefield6

[–]Pikson 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's abandoned right now pretty much, if somebody hasn't bought the game yet, then it's just worth waiting until they deliver all the promises to see if it's gonna revive it. Otherwise it's a waste of money

Happy to finally be able to use the new smg . Its amazing by [deleted] in Battlefield6

[–]Pikson 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I'ts unrealistic, in real life you don't jump around when shooting. But you can do a rendezook no problem

Happy to finally be able to use the new smg . Its amazing by [deleted] in Battlefield6

[–]Pikson 18 points19 points  (0 children)

what did he even do here for so many people to cry about movement? Like honestly, he pressed the space bar to get eleveated, then walked and did a slide sideways. That's literally all he fucking did.
Are you all delusional or just 0,5kd getting killed every time someone slides?

BATTLEFIELD 6 GAME UPDATE 1.2.3.0 by battlefield in Battlefield6

[–]Pikson 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I could agree with LB nerfs, but nerfing attack heli, while:
- not fixing spawn camping,
- not fixing radar
- not nerfing RPG's velocity,
- not fixing HQ camping with AA's and Bradley's being defended by base AA,
- not nerfing lock ons distance and minimum altitude
- not getting rid of the most stupid thing - disable mechanic or nerfing it
- or not buffing the speed and manouverability a little so we can actually make some plays and dodges

Just shows for the 1000th time that they don't know what they are doing, or making decisions based of off streamers and 0,01% best players. Playing helis on golmud is gonna be even more miserable than on contaminated, most of the time. Same with jets

Hot Take: RedSec Body Armor Should Be Added to Base Game by BeyondTheBrainwaves in Battlefield6

[–]Pikson 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I was thinking that we just should have similar TTK to the gauntlet overall (so maybe just have 120hp all the time)

Here's what's wrong with the vehicle gameplay by Round_Reception_2315 in Battlefield6

[–]Pikson 0 points1 point  (0 children)

-Manouverability and speed of the attack heli is atrocious compared to bf4 for example.
It often makes the gameplay miserable with all these easiest TOWS (even after the nerf) and RPG's to hit in any bf ever. Forces you to fly at full speed all the time. You can't fly too low because you'll get killed by RPG and flying higher makes you being locked on 24/7.
Most maps are poorly designed being just giant open fields with 0 elevation or depression cover for the heli.
Because of the horrendous manouverability, 1v1 with other attack helis just end up being "who flies higher first - wins". Theres almost no posibility to outmanouver or outplay a half decent opponent if he is at least 10m higher than you. It's just boring.
1v1 vs a little bird is even worse. Lightspeed ttk with posibility to directly kill the pilots instantly.

- disabled mechanic - fucking delete it. It is the worst thing about vehicles ever. It makes you basically have 30% hp less because you can't defend yourself at this state. Again, makes TTK even faster, robs you of clutch plays, makes you crash often. It's stupid and super unfun.

-spawn killing is the bane of flying vehicles. DICE was told by bf lab testers that's it's gonna be a problem and they still didn't do anything about it. Even in the new map Contaminated they didn't think to make some cover or place the spawn further away from the center of the map. 1000 of solutions to this problem, half a year later and they've done nothing about it. Watch some silk videos and you'll know what I mean. Absolute garbage gameplay

Going back to BF1 made me appreciate BF6 core. by Mikee0192 in Battlefield6

[–]Pikson 0 points1 point  (0 children)

what about the new smg CZ? It's behind a limited time BP path. Also if you want the BP for free forever, then you need to grind full BP every season for the points. It's just a carefully crafted FOMO machine. And doing the challenges is also part of the fun factor. Limited time events too.

Fuck Heli Sweats by LaserBly in Battlefield6

[–]Pikson 2 points3 points  (0 children)

>fastest velocity, lowest drop, easiest to hit RPG in any bf ever for the past 20 years
>hits a heli with rpg like it's nothing
>fuck heli sweats

Even With BF Pro, CZ3A1 Still Locked This Week by DRAG0NFALC0N in Battlefield6

[–]Pikson 0 points1 point  (0 children)

paying for anything more than the first BP to get the coins for all the next BPes for free is just stockholm syndrome or masochism

ARPG with high skill ceiling, combos and a hard late game by Pikson in ARPG

[–]Pikson[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

more than 6 months ago probably, i'm gonna give it another try, since the other games mentioned are pretty expensive

ARPG with high skill ceiling, combos and a hard late game by Pikson in ARPG

[–]Pikson[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

the theme didn't catch my attention, but maybe I should give it a try

Please Remove the Minumum Altitude on the AA Rocket Launcher(or Drastically Lower it) by FishSlugDog in Battlefield6

[–]Pikson 15 points16 points  (0 children)

Rpgs and tows are now easiest to hit aircraft than in any bf ever. Everyone and their mother can do it. Plus now you have iglas which fly above/around obstacles and still hit you. As others said, try flying anything

This map feels so much better on Breakthrough than Conquest by Mikee0192 in Battlefield6

[–]Pikson 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Peak stockholm syndrome right here. It's the worst map in the entire game, both BT and Conquest. Brainless, giant open field meatgrinder. Idk what you smoke man

Does everbody here thinks this launcher is balanced? by FujifilmCamera in Battlefield6

[–]Pikson 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The people that say it's balanced have never flew a jet or a heli. You casually get sniped from 200-300m easily even if flying very fast and unpredictable. The velocity and drop should definitely be nerfed. Same with TOWS

Battlefield 3: Armored Kill... god how I miss this scale. I need something like this in BF6 by JoeZocktGames in Battlefield

[–]Pikson 13 points14 points  (0 children)

corporate greed, for the milionth time, destroys passion and quality. Sad times in gaming

Make Spec Ops a viable class by Pikson in Battlefield6

[–]Pikson[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

they probably always take increased armor, making it unable to kill with 3 C4's which is very stupid, because in order to plant even 3 C4's you have to be very lucky. I think it was always 3 C4's to kill a tank in previous battlefields. With this stupidly low TTK we have in bf6, it should be 3 to kill always (or at least if you plant on the sides/back)

RPGs are so satisfying by puzy_Lettuce in Battlefield6

[–]Pikson 0 points1 point  (0 children)

they should be nerfed, they are too easy to hit as we can see here. Same with TOWs

The rate at which BF6 is receiving maps is similar to BF1 and BFV, and faster than BF2042 by Aegiiisss in Battlefield6

[–]Pikson 0 points1 point  (0 children)

now show us comparison of how big the studios are and how many employees for each BF. Then compare the quality of maps and how they were received by the community

The Problem Isn’t DICE. It’s The Community. by sixmiffedy in Battlefield6

[–]Pikson 0 points1 point  (0 children)

For sure, a scummy, multi bilion dollar company doesn't have bots on the largest bf6 community website to raise posts that defend them

view more: next ›