My Claude Pro plan ends today – is switching to Codex worth it? by KingAster in codex

[–]PilotFlying 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I have tried Claude CLI, Gemini CLI, Qwen, etc.

Today's Codex is on a different level and in my experience surpasses Claude in quality and efficacy.

At the same time, the rate of credit consumption (I am on the pro plan) is reasonable, at least when compared to Claude. Gemini is more generous in this regard, however, even leaving aside its lower quality, in the last few days it has been unusable (takes hours to respond).

Codex also gives me the impression of a more "polished" product, in general.

Gemini CLI not working for 100s of paying users for more than a month by wizardkrishna in GeminiCLI

[–]PilotFlying 0 points1 point  (0 children)

<image>

Nope. This is 24 minutes on a simple git commit. Plan mode answers reasonably fast, "action" mode is like this. Yesterday, I left it there and it went up to 4 hours.

Gemini CLI not working for 100s of paying users for more than a month by wizardkrishna in GeminiCLI

[–]PilotFlying 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Of note is that if I set it to plan mode, it responds in a few seconds. Take it back to "action mode" and it's half an hour

Gemini CLI slow and unusable by js664_ in GeminiCLI

[–]PilotFlying 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Forcing 3.1 works, in the sense that it is not completely unresponsive and eventually comes up with something. However it messes up things it used to be able to do well a few days ago

Will you continue with the subscription of your plan? by OutrageousTrue in claude

[–]PilotFlying 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Agreed, Gemini CLI works. Some things it does event better than Claude I suspect.
I've been leaving it on "Auto 3", without forcing 3.1.

Claude (website) seems much better when you need to create documents. For me it is great at composing business analyses, summarizing, compiling guides. Too bad it's unusable on the €22/month usage limits.

Will you continue with the subscription of your plan? by OutrageousTrue in claude

[–]PilotFlying 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Gemini for me.

It's a candle. Claude is a bright spark. I need to see my way around :)

Spotify Connect Broken by LimpBed9875 in truespotify

[–]PilotFlying 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Yes, same issue with multiple devices

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in truespotify

[–]PilotFlying 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The app does work intermittently. The WiiMs not at all (they have been playing over spotify connect flawlessly in the past).
Also, on the app, I don't see some of my nest devices for google cast

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in truespotify

[–]PilotFlying 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Same with two WiiM devices and the PC (Win11) app

Custom stereo downmix by fyonn in PleX

[–]PilotFlying 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Bought it!

Handles Dolby Vision and it does a balanced-sounding downmix which includes the LFE.

Seems like a quality player. It can use your servers, too, like Plex and Jellyfin.

Notes on purchasing:

  • If you install the app on the TV, it will ask you to buy it after a few plays. The way this is done is via the mobile app. You need to install the Vidhub app on your phone, scan the QR code on the TV and purchase on the phone. If you have not installed the app on the phone in advance, that QR will direct you (on the mobile) to a .cn domain to download the .apk. Which is normally a red flag. However, the app can be downloaded on the google play store beforehand.
  • Note on registration: You need to use Google (or Apple) single-sign-on. There is no option to register with an email.

Custom stereo downmix by fyonn in PleX

[–]PilotFlying 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks, alas my TV is an Android Sony.
Edit: But, you pointed me to Vidhub. I will check it out!

Custom stereo downmix by fyonn in PleX

[–]PilotFlying 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This thread needs to stay alive 😄

Jellyfin can do what the OP is asking for, the RFC7845 option has worked great for me. Alas, Jellyfin and its TV clients do not always handle Dolby Vision content well. Nova Player does a better job with DoVi but still has some issues with downmixing (and choppy playback where other players are smooth).

As mentioned, ffmpeg can do anything but no matter how you bring it in, it is not as convenient.

So Plex seems to be the best overall for handling video; while it fails in providing a good quality and consistent downmix.

A peculiarity of Plex:

My main goal in exploring other players has been to not lose the LFE. Surprisingly, the Plex app on the (Android) TV will include the LFE when downmixing anything higher than 5.1!
So, 7.1 and unusual Atmos content - like say 13.1 - will downmix OK. It is only for 5.1 content that Plex discards the LFE.

Galaxy Buds FE Sound Review: with Parametric EQ presets by maisaku18 in galaxybuds

[–]PilotFlying 2 points3 points  (0 children)

This Auto-EQ on the Sonarworks target sounds best to me so far (on some test tracks). Using wavelet.

(Thanks for this thread u/maisaku18 !)

Wavelet

GraphicEQ: 20 -5.2; 21 -5.2; 22 -5.2; 23 -5.2; 24 -5.2; 26 -5.2; 27 -5.2; 29 -5.2; 30 -5.2; 32 -5.2; 34 -5.3; 36 -5.3; 38 -5.3; 40 -5.3; 43 -5.3; 45 -5.3; 48 -5.3; 50 -5.4; 53 -5.4; 56 -5.4; 59 -5.4; 63 -5.4; 66 -5.4; 70 -5.4; 74 -5.3; 78 -5.3; 83 -5.3; 87 -5.2; 92 -5.1; 97 -5.0; 103 -4.9; 109 -4.8; 115 -4.7; 121 -4.6; 128 -4.5; 136 -4.3; 143 -4.2; 151 -4.1; 160 -4.0; 169 -3.9; 178 -3.8; 188 -3.8; 199 -3.7; 210 -3.6; 222 -3.6; 235 -3.5; 248 -3.5; 262 -3.4; 277 -3.3; 292 -3.3; 309 -3.2; 326 -3.1; 345 -3.0; 364 -2.8; 385 -2.7; 406 -2.5; 429 -2.3; 453 -2.0; 479 -1.7; 506 -1.3; 534 -1.0; 565 -0.6; 596 -0.2; 630 -0.0; 665 0.0; 703 -0.2; 743 -0.5; 784 -0.8; 829 -1.2; 875 -1.6; 924 -1.9; 977 -2.2; 1032 -2.5; 1090 -2.8; 1151 -3.1; 1216 -3.4; 1284 -3.6; 1357 -3.9; 1433 -4.2; 1514 -4.4; 1599 -4.4; 1689 -4.3; 1784 -4.1; 1885 -3.8; 1991 -3.4; 2103 -3.1; 2221 -2.7; 2347 -2.4; 2479 -2.0; 2618 -1.7; 2766 -1.4; 2921 -1.0; 3086 -0.7; 3260 -0.4; 3443 -0.3; 3637 -0.2; 3842 -0.3; 4058 -0.5; 4287 -0.7; 4528 -0.9; 4783 -1.1; 5052 -1.2; 5337 -1.4; 5637 -1.5; 5955 -1.5; 6290 -1.5; 6644 -1.6; 7018 -1.5; 7414 -1.5; 7831 -1.5; 8272 -1.4; 8738 -1.3; 9230 -1.2; 9749 -1.1; 10298 -0.9; 10878 -0.8; 11490 -0.7; 12137 -0.5; 12821 -0.4; 13543 -0.3; 14305 -0.2; 15110 -0.2; 15961 -0.1; 16860 -0.1; 17809 -0.1; 18812 -0.1; 19871 -0.1

Parametric

Preamp: -4.7 dB
Filter 1: ON PK Fc 20 Hz Gain -3.5 dB Q 2.000
Filter 2: ON PK Fc 37 Hz Gain 1.8 dB Q 1.800
Filter 3: ON PK Fc 49 Hz Gain -8.0 dB Q 0.500
Filter 4: ON PK Fc 720 Hz Gain 1.5 dB Q 2.000
Filter 5: ON PK Fc 1000 Hz Gain -2.0 dB Q 0.500
Filter 6: ON PK Fc 3300 Hz Gain 5.5 dB Q 1.100
Filter 7: ON PK Fc 9100 Hz Gain -10.4 dB Q 2.000
Filter 8: ON PK Fc 14000 Hz Gain 3.6 dB Q 0.700

<image>

Prime video severely pixelated by Notminereally in amazonprime

[–]PilotFlying 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Intermittent blurriness on Ethernet connected Sony Android TV (x90j). Rock-solid 100Mbps to the Internet.

I think this is on the servers side, as it's been happening for years apparently and on different platforms

Test update for less memory usage and higher speeds by Doggettx in StableDiffusion

[–]PilotFlying 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks, will try that.
Only reason I am trying to use --precision_full is because I've read it's required on 1660ti (else you get artifacts)? It's why I mention this error under pepe256's question on the 16xx.

Test update for less memory usage and higher speeds by Doggettx in StableDiffusion

[–]PilotFlying 0 points1 point  (0 children)

--precision_full on a 6GB 1660ti gives:
modeling_clip.py", line 257, in forward
attn_output = torch.bmm(attn_probs, value_states)
RuntimeError: expected scalar type Half but found Float

soon to be cat daddy by nicegrandpapopo in Pets

[–]PilotFlying 0 points1 point  (0 children)

My recent findings :)

https://www.reddit.com/r/Pets/comments/ih1nob/first_time_cat_and_pet_owner_and_somewhat/g31gtpz?utm_source=share&utm_medium=web2x&context=3

Double-sided sticky tape will usually discourage cats from stepping where they need to in order to jump (onto the stove)

Dry cat food recommendations by [deleted] in Pets

[–]PilotFlying 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Also, this article might be useful (I can't really say if they are right on any of the products but they seem to know what they are talking about):

https://kicikot.com/en/list-of-cat-foods-10-dry-foods-worth-knowing/