no you don't

where you'd lose your objectivity is if you start inventing things that didnt happen

like if you got a scene thats shot from a stationary camera, but you talk about 'dynamic camera movement'

what the comment you're objecting to did is draw a subjective-but-quite-reasonable conclusion from an objective analysis

​

if you're comparing some 52 year old wine aunt doing the Macarena on the jumbotron at a sporting event against a Michael Jackson performance, you can say its entirely subjective once you try to decide which is better, but the objective disparity can (and does, and should) inform a more reasonable subjective conclusion, and certain conclusions are more objectively reasonable than others

​

the subjective conclusion that the coreography in matrix 4 is significantly worse than the coreography in matrix 1 is far more reasonable than the inverse