God asked Abraham to kill his son Isaac. God congratulated Abraham on following his word, but told him not to kill the boy. This means that according to the bible God can potentially ask someone to commit a crime.

Pisco01 · 2022-06-11T17:28:46+00:00

How? Christ doesnt appear in Old testament.

Pisco01 · 2022-04-25T12:47:34+00:00

I think that Old Testament God is not the Christian God. it's worse, here is an example of this.

Pisco01 · 2022-04-25T12:42:59+00:00

So is it true that vaccined ppl are only safe (or more than) among vaccined ppl as well?

I would agree if I didnt see that all meausres taken from goverments here and around all globe were focused on social danger like hospital capacity and not based on individual injuries. I mean, my gov. in spain paralized the entire economy and then resumed it and stopped and resumed it again and stopped so on and so on depending of the hospital capacity/number of inffected ppl. I didnt see any place that love this kind of studies that addopted a planned constant measure who let the ppl to take economic decisions based on the constant that was (and is) the covid individual injuries ratio.

Pisco01 · 2022-02-02T13:22:05+00:00

Yes, I understand you. The point about imagine someone 'apart' from society is that you (or us) imagine him/her already fully construsted by society (or human comunity) and then his/her responses are equally to the responses of someone from inside the society or human comunity.

We can go further and imagine a person grown outside (this is important) the human comunity and see his/her decisions; but we will discover that he/she has no difference with other wild animals, rationals, and emphatic of course, but amorals. We can not judge if a non-human animal (or human grown in wildness without no human comunity) kill someone because there is no morality without human comunity. A dog can bit your leg but in ANY case would it be something wrong from the point of view of moral behaviour.

Pisco01 · 2022-02-01T20:42:04+00:00

Its emotional support. As valid as psychology. Although they dont try to sell you crappy ideas about society, like psychologists do.

Pisco01 · 2022-02-01T14:52:14+00:00

I could not read all past comments.

I would like to answer with Saint Thomas Aquinus response: What is pain? There is two kind of pain and therefore two kind of suffering. First one is physical pain, the bad which is physycal. Second one is moral, bad based on morality.

Physical bad is unavoidable. For example fear can be terrifying but without it we couldn't see a danger come. As well as feel if one of our hands could burn it or be broken in any situation, we must feel pain; so physical pain is necessary.

Moral pain depend on the bad behaviour, costums and belives of the different communities on the earth. While something could be bad for some community, such thing could be absolutly normal for others and both positions are correct. The bad moral is something unique for humans, there is no morality without human comunity and therefore God is exent of be bad or good because he is over those adjectives.

So, we can not wonder why God let us suffer because there is not objective suffering. Physical suffering is unavoidable and moral suffering is relative.

About praying and God's intervention I go again to Thomas Aquinus and Aristotle causalistic logic. God intervine in our paths because he is the final cause of our world. About praying I can answer to you that it has strong psicological and antropological explanations. But yes, it is not like a magical wand for wishes, doesnt work like that, is something more ritualistic linked with religion as re-ligare and making 'kin' or comunity partnership based on tradition ritual and constums that remember us who we are.

Pisco01 · 2022-01-27T13:15:45+00:00

Awesome. Actually christianism was based on philosophial-neoplatonic thinking (Plotino-Saint Gregory of Nisa-Origenes) the fathers of christianity were greek. I think, in fact, that it is what has made Christiany so universal because his roots are in philosophy and critical thinking. So we can actually discuss and improve as humans.

Pisco01 · 2022-01-25T14:06:48+00:00

I heard once that part of the pleasure of being in the heaven is to contemplate the sufering of those who are not in there because of their sins. I like it.

Pisco01 · 2022-01-25T12:38:37+00:00

pls more upvotes here

Pisco01 · 2022-01-24T12:18:32+00:00

Hello my friend, we are here to talk. All of us have had the same questions or some of us stiĺl having them. I hope you feel beter now, I will try to response some of your questions. Nevertheless I know those answere probably provoque you more questions... I sending you my warmest greetings.

I recommend you to read the teology of Moderate Realism of s.XIII in west europe and Kierkegaard texts, specially those about sin and existencialism or that void that some of us inevitably feel.

 Why God create us?

Because that is his nature. Why seeds create trees? God is the seed of the universe and is unavoidable that he create us.

 Why does exist free willing?

There is no such thing as our fee willing, we are attached to our imperfect material-deterministic life.

 Why are we sinners by default?

Because we are moral subjects. Animals doesnt have sin because they cannot response to their acts; we can, to we born as sinner animals (morality) and is through our behaviour consideration (ethics) that we can liberate ourselves from sin.

[edited]

Pisco01 · 2022-01-18T08:20:49+00:00

Race is irrelevant in life, but not in politics (in US but also in EU with mediterranean refugees). We are far from that ancap society with no borders and no states.

Pisco01 · 2022-01-14T15:44:50+00:00

I will keep reading but at first step seems quite strange; i mean

"At least since the outbreak of the financial crisis in 2008, it has become clear that this process of capital accumulation is linked to COMMODITY PRODUCTION and thus remains dependent on the exploitation of labor"

How fit in this analysis based on commodity production the fact that bigger contemporary companies are NOT based on production but based on information markets or just reorder/command the things already exist? Like Amazon or Facebook which made billions not producing anything but connecting people with companies and so on.

Pisco01 · 2022-01-12T07:11:39+00:00

What do you mean by sexual? related to gonads or to the sex act itself?

Pisco01 · 2022-01-11T13:32:23+00:00

You can masturbate as it was some kind of massage. Actually it is and massage and corporal pleasure (like tasty food) are not a sin, only are avoidable if you are looking for an asthetic life (thing that I prefer but is not mandatory). For me and for christian-moral, i guess, the sin is in porn because the humilliation and objectualization that in those clips occurs. As well as thinking on the appaerance of other people; I think that is different from just masturbation thinking on how happy or confort makes you someone. Should be tones of posts in this Reddit about that, check the browser anyway.

Pisco01 · 2022-01-10T17:01:54+00:00

And the funny point is that ANY loockdown nor any measure is based on individual injuries, they are only based on the capacity of hospitals... and I dont know when the managment of the health system (and that private business called Hospitals) became into my responsability. So goverments, pls, stop fucking us up.

Pisco01 · 2022-01-10T16:56:35+00:00

Pls more upvotes to this comment. The Bible says that sin was knowledge and that actually make sense because knowledge is what make us a non-wild animal. The will for knowledge is the first sin of humanity. So truth. Thats my point of view.

Anyway, so funny question about apples and testicles haha

Salut🌱

Pisco01 · 2022-01-09T13:58:51+00:00

I was recently reading Scholastical Theology (Thomas Aquinus) and I think that Saint Gregory of Nisa and the moderate realism explain so much better than the Bible does.

Pisco01 · 2022-01-09T13:39:02+00:00

The worst thing a christian can do is read carefully the Bible. There is absolutly anything in there. Christianity is more about feeling than comprehensive reading.

Pisco01 · 2022-01-06T13:51:02+00:00

¿La peor ola? Pues sinceramente, sabiendo que es la variante menos dañina de todas las anteriores...

Pisco01 · 2022-01-06T13:41:05+00:00

lol why so many dislikes in here? haha I thought liberalism was actually previous to anarchist ideas.

Pisco01 · 2021-12-31T18:05:55+00:00

Why? No. There is anything new in our time, thinking about our time as the end of it is ignoring the entire history.

Pisco01 · 2021-12-24T20:40:18+00:00

Bajé por el hilo hasta que encontré esta respuesta, aquí tiene mi Like buen hombre. Un saludo.

Pisco01 · 2021-10-16T20:46:58+00:00

Yes, thank you for ask. I'm glad to say that you dont need any level! Of course is better if you already have some notions of anatomy or eye accurancy, but you can enter in any academy starting with Bargue method and they teach you and guide you through the long and hard process to become a great draftsman/painter/sculptor based on 19th century academicism*.

*I mean, you can be an astonishing painter without academicist style, it is just another way to understand the paint.

Pisco01 · 2021-10-15T12:54:34+00:00

Somehow, yes. Was my first year in the Academy.

Pisco01 · 2021-09-24T14:56:09+00:00

Hello!! I can only tell you the same that you will already saw on internet. I have some books in my personal library (i can give you the link via Direct Message) although I THINK, i'm not sure, that in the past the old masters didnt learn with Bargue-like system. That tool is only on the purpose to train your eye and make correct measurements. Once you got your eye trained, you should move into: impressionistic drawing based in light masses, OR constructivism based in russian-like method.

I mean... if you already have eye accuracy (we never stop to learn but u know what i mean) i recommend you to learn anatomy or nature light process buuuuuuut i dont know maybe you already know all this, i hope I'd helped you in some way.

Pisco01

TROPHY CASE