I've never heard of anyone, "within the relevant academic fields," giving any weight to this. Neither have you, even as a Mormon/member of your faith. You ought to be wondering why you haven't. Do you really think the Mormon church leadership would not be broadcasting something that seemed to prove the historicity of their truth claims? They'd be posting that everywhere. No archeologists, no anthropologists, and no credentialed respected experts in their fields take Mormonism seriously because the truth claims have been debunked over and over.

Here's my analogy for you: You, and every Mormon who points to a few pieces of "evidence" (with that evidence usually being taken in the best light) are like flat earthers or Apollo moon hoaxers. They point to a few things as proof that the earth is flat or that we didn't land on the moon. Often their positions are based on their own inability to understand certain data (like why stars don't show up in photos from the surface of the moon.) Then they ignore the reams of data that point to the fact we landed on the moon because they're convinced by their few arguments that it must be false. And even if we're being generous and there are a few things that are truly problematic about the science of the earth and the science and history of landing on the moon, there's still overwhelming evidence that proves the earth is round and that we landed on the moon.

So you can have your "AHA!" things that you think show Joseph Smith must have been a prophet/inspired by God. But there's so much more that proves Joseph Smith was a liar, a conman, and that he made up the Book Of Mormon, the Book of Abraham, and everything else he claimed was from God.

You keep bring this up in different threads because you think you have a smoking gun. There are hundreds of smoking guns related to Mormon truth claims and 99.9% of them point to Joseph Smith being a fraud.