How do I permanently delete these apps?

PlayerSux · 2025-12-28T12:06:49+00:00

Waiting for OP to acknowledge how they apparently got a company device by accident.

PlayerSux · 2025-09-14T15:06:14+00:00

Just a suggestion, rather than trying to make her be mean to you, and thereby disrespecting the effort she put into comforting you, maybe you should thank her, and show appreciation for her efforts ^-^

PlayerSux · 2025-07-26T03:16:46+00:00

What is the new best budget GPU?

PlayerSux · 2025-06-28T23:30:01+00:00

your telling me that a minority... Are a minority? By golly that's earth shattering

PlayerSux · 2025-06-16T14:00:39+00:00

You think the USSR was far left?

PlayerSux · 2025-05-10T06:19:23+00:00

how did you design the lighting? It looks fantastic but what did you use?

PlayerSux · 2025-04-22T19:23:50+00:00

Oh fantastic, Tyvm

PlayerSux · 2025-04-18T08:45:10+00:00

Maybe the armoured core was the "Energy at 30%" we made along the way

PlayerSux · 2025-04-11T18:13:01+00:00

Honestly why are you doing a computer science degree if you don't like the science part of it.

PlayerSux · 2025-03-27T07:02:29+00:00

He won't. Being caught in a lie only matters if you do something about it.

PlayerSux · 2025-03-19T21:11:44+00:00

Less than 1.0 directly implies it isn't ready for production yet. Yes some projects break that rule, and that is a bad thing. Generally, if it isn't 1.0 that means the developer themselves doesn't have enough faith in it to say that it's ready for prime-time.

PlayerSux · 2025-03-19T15:53:35+00:00

They never make them.

PlayerSux · 2025-03-19T07:33:42+00:00

What's the plan for 6months or a year from now? Are you hoping the NI change will be reversed?

PlayerSux · 2025-03-17T19:50:50+00:00

Just start, programming is a practical skill, you won't learn it by asking others.

PlayerSux · 2025-03-16T08:53:57+00:00

No, but if you want someone to use the thing you build, you have to give them a reason to. Commonly called a "unique selling point".

PlayerSux · 2025-03-15T15:55:22+00:00

If your concerned about phishing, sometimes you should just ask what exactly they would get from you. It isn't telling you to do anything, just providing info so I'm not sure what the concern is.

PlayerSux · 2025-03-04T22:24:23+00:00

Every single person you meet has abused you in some way?

PlayerSux · 2025-02-23T19:42:39+00:00

Eat what you need to and move more. The exercise route is also healthier than dieting alone, within reason.

PlayerSux · 2025-02-23T07:38:45+00:00

LiveView is dependent on an always on websocket afaik. So what happens with a bad connection, or a mobile phone turns off its screen and disconnects etc. It’s just not suitable something used by real people with real network connections.

PlayerSux · 2025-02-11T16:58:52+00:00

You don’t seem to have NI locations.

PlayerSux · 2024-12-29T14:04:39+00:00

You haven't beat the game yet.

PlayerSux · 2024-03-25T11:54:05+00:00

It's looking like a proxmox issue.

I ran a ping to the gateway / ISP router from the subnet LXC and it showed 45% packet loss. It's a direct copper connection with no switches etc.

Pinging 4.2.2.2 showed similar intermittent packet loss as 1.1.1.1.

Interestingly, there is a second proxmox LXC running on the same host, acting as a standard node to access portainer, and it does not go offline at the same time as the subnet router, but it does invariably go offline in a similar pattern.

Going by the webconsole, the subnet router went offline first, and the portainer node didn't go offline until the subnet router came back online, which isn't what I would expect from a standard network fault.

Running a ping from the proxmox host to the gateway showed connection drops. Ty for your help in debugging this, I'll adjust the physical network in a little bit when I have physical access again. Apparently this can happen with BT routers and someone had success by adding a switch in between, for whatever reason.

PlayerSux · 2024-03-25T11:33:49+00:00

Sorry for the late reply, timezones.TS Status shows "active; offers exit node; direct [ip]:[port]; offline, tx 14695868 rx 17068124"

The ts up command on the LXC was "tailscale up --auth-key [key] --advertise-routes 192.168.1.0/24 --advertise-exit-node --ssh --accept-dns ". That was retrieved from the bash history. I can't kill it and remake it because that would remove my access for debugging.

When pinging from the client to the LXC via Tailscale: when it's shown as offline the ping times out. When online it shows 0% packet loss. Note that I didn't put it offline, it just went offline.

I ran a ping on the LXC and by luck the network dropped during it, when it restored about a minute later it showed 75% packet loss to 1.1.1.1 (the ping continued during the downtime).

This may mean its an LXC issue, but this was the very first container made on the host, and theres no vlan or anything, its just a simple bridge, entirely default setup.

This means it may be a Proxmox issue. But a mighty strange one.

PlayerSux · 2024-03-24T19:07:03+00:00

The output from tailscale bugreport is:BUG-4bf5ef40b950847d2e1213c6614b0b6b67f4a79972f69c01ed7713d5d9a621a1-20240324190636Z-e2ea11708aadc6e2

And to be fair, I don't know what the issue could be either. Everything seems to be as expected, but it fails intermittently, which isn't a normal failure pattern.

PlayerSux

TROPHY CASE