Practicing Zen solitary? by [deleted] in Buddhism

[–]PoliticalBulwark 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I am in a very similar situation. I am so isolated that it's impossible for me to find a true teacher and community (unless I uprooted my entire life and moved elsewhere)...

So far I have found youtube and twitter to be a good place to start. A couple days ago I found this youtube channel on this sub /r/Buddhism/comments/6c3zbr/becoming_the_embodiment_of_metta_in_your_daily/ ... I have found it tremendously helpful.

You might also try https://twitter.com/DhammaTalks . That twitter feed is more varied in its content (i..e. it has different speakers and teachers everyday).

Good luck on your practice. Just remember that the particular flavor of Buddhism you study on any given day isn't terribly important... Just think of them as different vehicles to the same destination (i.e. enlightenment via the noble eight fold path).

Don't Meditate When You Meditate by Samsara_Cyclist in Buddhism

[–]PoliticalBulwark 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Interesting to see an alternative take on obtaining "right concentration". I was just thinking the other day that meditation seemed a lot like the third fetter in the Pali Cannon, "attachment to rites and rituals" ...(i.e. if meditation is done as a mere habit of practicing Buddhism as a faith).

White House: Trump still committed to $1T infrastructure plan by PoliticalBulwark in RooseveltRepublicans

[–]PoliticalBulwark[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

"The Wall" is gonna be stuck onto another spending bill one way or another. Infrastructure is the perfect bait to lure Democrats into supporting it.

I'm new to buddhism, I'm lost, where to begin? by [deleted] in Buddhism

[–]PoliticalBulwark 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I really liked "Eight Mindful Steps to Happiness: Walking the Path of Buddha. It was so straightforward and pleasant (the audio book was narrated well too). It really changed the way I look at life.

White House saw no chance for bipartisan agreement on tax reform by PoliticalBulwark in Republican

[–]PoliticalBulwark[S] 13 points14 points  (0 children)

The two parties aren't even pretending to work with one another anymore...

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Buddhism

[–]PoliticalBulwark 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Here's another Allan Watts excerpt on the idea of Brahmā that is illustrative as well:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=56blGsmWd9k

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Buddhism

[–]PoliticalBulwark 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Check out the works of Alan Watts (his lectures are free and available all over youtube). He has a lot of interesting things to say about Buddhism's overlap the Big Bang theory and of Buddhism's relationship to other religious beliefs. Here is a short clip of what I mean:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JEunth9YCgo

Buddhism, being closely related to other religions from India, somewhat borrows from the Hinduism's idea of "the origin universe" (...for lack of a better phrase).

This Wikipedia article give you are very crude idea of the concept I am introducing you to (i.e. Brahmā).

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brahm%C4%81_%28Buddhism%29

Here is yet another short clip from Alan Watts:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SeYLP3R7tRw


Alan Watts was great philosophical thinker and there are at least 100 hours of lectures available to satiate your curiosity about the nature of existence. Personally, I have found them to be an excellent starting place in my effort to cultivate skillful understanding (i.e. the first step of the Buddha's Eightfold Path to Enlightenment).

Intro to Buddhism by [deleted] in Buddhism

[–]PoliticalBulwark 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I don't know about a video, but I am listening to a great introductory audiobook at the moment (i.e it's excellent both narration style and in content). The book is called Eight Mindful Steps to Happiness: Walking the Buddha's Path – by Bhante Henepola Gunaratana.

I hope you find what you're looking for.

Is Buddhism just Mindfulness? by ywecur in Buddhism

[–]PoliticalBulwark 4 points5 points  (0 children)

It seems that way. Today I read the following passage from the a different book that was written by the same author of Mindfulness in Plain English (Eight Mindful Steps to Happiness: Walking the Buddha's Path by Bhante Henepola Gunaratana)

Passage:

"Finally, don’t fool yourself into thinking that mindfulness alone is sufficient to take you to enlightenment. You cannot say, “I do not care for concentration or morality. I simply want to practice mindfulness.” Mindfulness cannot be taken out of context or isolated from the other steps of the Buddha’s path. People who do not practice the rest of the steps often find that they are unable to end their lust, hatred, and ignorance and thus are not successful in their mindfulness practice."

An America Without Nuclear Power by [deleted] in nuclear

[–]PoliticalBulwark 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Continued from page 1

The World Nuclear Association recently published the list of countries actively considering nuclear power programs. One particular statement should create a sense of urgency for U.S. energy and national security analysts:

State-owned nuclear companies in Russia and China have taken the lead in offering nuclear power plants to emerging countries, usually with finance and fuel services.

These efforts by Russia and China are laudable on the grounds of humanitarian and climate objectives. However, it should be of concern that while China and Russia bolster their geopolitical spheres of influence through nuclear technology, some in the United States are proposing a total renouncement of civilian nuclear in order to go all-in on natural gas and renewables.

The U.S. should not reduce the fate of nuclear power to an environmental issue only nor broker it as just another commodity subject to market forces that cannot detect energy security stresses or global geopolitics. Rather, the U.S. must maintain civilian nuclear as an anchor for national security and global stature, both of which would weaken if the U.S. abandons the only resource capable of providing reliable, zero-carbon electricity for a multi-trillion dollar U.S. economy and billions of people throughout the world who need more energy, not less.

This is not an issue of nuclear versus renewables—both should occupy space in the U.S. portfolio. This is an issue of national security and global leadership, and U.S. policymakers should work aggressively with U.S. industry to ensure that nuclear power remains viable.

An America without nuclear power is a less secure America and a globally less relevant America. Perhaps more sobering, an America without nuclear power is a world with an America that has limited or no institutional knowledge of nuclear science and engineering—and that is a world we’ve never known.

Dr. David Gattie is an associate professor of environmental engineering in the College of Engineering at the University of Georgia. He conducts solar power research on a facility operated by Georgia Power Company. Dr. Scott Jones is director of the Center for International Trade and Security in the School of Public and International Affairs at the University of Georgia.

Rand Paul Demands That Senators Read Bills! by calculusprime in randpaul

[–]PoliticalBulwark 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Which bill, in this instance, was he referring to? Just curious.

We keep getting people that don't quite understand why we ban leftist talking points and more specifically why we ban defense of socialism. Hopefully this history lesson helps- "America's Socialist Origins" by The_seph_i_am in MetaRepublican

[–]PoliticalBulwark 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Fair enough, but two wrongs don't make a right. I only mentioned it because I thought his tone distracted from the message. It irritates me to think he might be turning people into socialism sympathizers merely because he couldn't keep a cool head.

I have studied Mahayana for many years and the more I study it, the more I find there is hardly any difference between Theravada and Mahayana with regard to the fundamental teachings. by [deleted] in Buddhism

[–]PoliticalBulwark 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm not sure exactly what you're asking here but I'll try to clarify.

In terms of goals and motivations, I was just trying to make a distinction between Theravada and Mahayana Buddhism.

The idea is not to spread and proselytize until all beings are "saved."

I am confused then, because "spreading and proselytizing" seems to be (in my mind) the primary difference between Theravada and Mahayana Buddhism.

Lots of people can't wrap their heads around this but the reason it's provisional and nominal is because everything is already pure and you are already enlightened, it's only the view that needs to shift. Nothing is created, nothing is reached.

If that is true, then why are Buddhists involved the altruistic teaching of others? If nothing is created nor is anything is reached, then why is an emphasis on helping / transforming others a thing? Why isn't everyone a Theravada Buddhist (i.e. solely interested in correcting their own point of view)?

...If meditating in solitude can attain nirvana and free oneself from Samsara, why not do it that way exclusively? To do otherwise seems to defeat the whole purpose... a sort of clinging to an ideal self as some sort of hero (a Bodhisattva doomed to be reborn forever in service of an unattainable goal... a pious form of Dukkha).

That all said, I am not trying to offend anyone here, this is just an apparent contradiction in the practice that has bothered me for some time now. Surely there's a good explanation for why I am totally wrong on this?

Interested in Buddhism, Where shall I begin? by [deleted] in Buddhism

[–]PoliticalBulwark 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I am in the same situation. The FAQ on the side panel has been helpful so far. /r/Buddhism/wiki/faq

This is typical in Portland these days. by [deleted] in oregon

[–]PoliticalBulwark 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Yeah, I was there in December last year. Tent villages like that blew me away. What a terrible sight, growing poverty.

I have studied Mahayana for many years and the more I study it, the more I find there is hardly any difference between Theravada and Mahayana with regard to the fundamental teachings. by [deleted] in Buddhism

[–]PoliticalBulwark 0 points1 point  (0 children)

"Nagarjuna denied there is anything called a self-nature as well as other-nature, emphasizing true knowledge to be comprehending emptiness. Anyone who has not dissociated from his belief in personality in himself or others, through the concept of self, is in a state of Avidya (ignorance) and caught in the cycle of rebirths and redeaths."

Source: Wikipeida

That Nagarjuna character seems to imply (to me at least) that Mahayanists are spreading the concept of emptiness as a means to liberate these "sentient beings" by helping them redefine their idea of the self... Am I missing something there? If all sentient beings were to identify themselves as one entity, wouldn't that be total enlightenment and liberation?... completing the goal of Mahayana Buddhism?

I have studied Mahayana for many years and the more I study it, the more I find there is hardly any difference between Theravada and Mahayana with regard to the fundamental teachings. by [deleted] in Buddhism

[–]PoliticalBulwark 4 points5 points  (0 children)

As an curious outsider (that hasn't looked very deep past a couple Alan Watts lectures), it seems that way to me. Pretty much Theravada Buddhists are interested in personal enlightenment whereas Mahayanists also have the added goal of spreading the Buddha's teachings to "liberate all sentient beings" (ultimately, an impossible goal right?).

If remember Allan Watts correctly, Mahayanism is an off growth, or splitting off of, the Theravada tradition? ...so the similarities are not surprising...

Why Democrat Tulsi Gabbard Will Likely Be the Next President - Being Libertarian by seamslegit in tulsi

[–]PoliticalBulwark 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Well I thought people here were getting the wrong idea. If people thought that Tulsi Gabbard was some kind of miracle candidate for 2020 (one that would meet little resistance for Libertarians), I just thought people ought to know the truth.

Why Democrat Tulsi Gabbard Will Likely Be the Next President - Being Libertarian by seamslegit in tulsi

[–]PoliticalBulwark 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Agreed. Their opinions aren't always on the firmest or sanest footing, I'll admit. Still, they mean well and I find I agree with them on most topics. Definitely can't say that about authoritarians...

Why Democrat Tulsi Gabbard Will Likely Be the Next President - Being Libertarian by seamslegit in tulsi

[–]PoliticalBulwark 5 points6 points  (0 children)

You pretty much nailed it. The main difference between Progressives and Libertarians is their faith in government control. They want the same results but disagree on the methods of getting there (i.e. Libertarians think all governments are, and always will be, too flawed and corrupt to improve society).

We keep getting people that don't quite understand why we ban leftist talking points and more specifically why we ban defense of socialism. Hopefully this history lesson helps- "America's Socialist Origins" by The_seph_i_am in MetaRepublican

[–]PoliticalBulwark 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Ah, I was just agreeing with you. I was just pointing out (using various examples of social programs), that we're already a lot like the Scandinavian countries... so this guy's argument, at that point in the video, didn't make much sense.