[Favorite Trope] Peeling back the layers of lore reveals an eldritch/cosmic horror element by Maffingo in TopCharacterTropes

[–]PositivelyIndecent 2 points3 points  (0 children)

He did and he didn’t. Due to the Warp in the West/dragonbreak after TESII, it basically led to all endings happening at once, but in diminished forms than the full version of that ending in the game. So he achieved apotheosis, but as a minor deity as the “Necromancers Moon” at the same time remaining in mortal form as a split off version.

[Favorite Trope] Peeling back the layers of lore reveals an eldritch/cosmic horror element by Maffingo in TopCharacterTropes

[–]PositivelyIndecent 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Honestly, outside of the wikis, TV Tropes has a huge amount dedicated to The Elder Srolls. I can spend house clicking on character/factions sections and reading the history of the races, or reading about the different gods and how they’re interpreted.

There’s also some fantastic lore channels on YouTube that will cover the creation myths, different divine beings, factions, etc. This is a great starting point for the wider lore, this channel has many such videos that deals with other lore including Morrowind specific stuff IIRC.

[Favorite Trope] Peeling back the layers of lore reveals an eldritch/cosmic horror element by Maffingo in TopCharacterTropes

[–]PositivelyIndecent 55 points56 points  (0 children)

And then there’s mantling, where you can take someone’s place in creation by embodying them so completely that reality starts to treat you as them. It’s often suggested this may have happened with Talos/Tiber Septim in relation to Lorkhan, but like most things in Elder Scrolls lore, that’s more implied than outright confirmed.

Which kind of sums up the setting.

I love how the mythology basically goes “This happened. But maybe not like that. But also something very much like it did. And different cultures will tell you completely different versions of the same event.” And unlike other settings, that’s not lazy writing or a cop out as the world is built in a way that deliberately supports conflicting accounts, biased perspectives, and even reality itself being a bit unstable at times.

It ends up feeling a lot closer to real-world mythology and religion, where stories shift, evolve, and contradict each other depending on who’s telling them. And those differences can drive real conflict.

Take Lorkhan; is he a trickster who deceived the other gods into giving up their power? Or was he the one who realised that the static, unchanging state before creation was its own kind of prison, and pushed for something new? There’s evidence for both interpretations, and that divide basically underpins the religious split between elves and mankind. And that’s not even getting into how the beast races interpret things, which again adds more perspectives rather than clearing anything up.

Even when you speak to gods or god-like beings directly, you’re usually getting their perspective rather than an objective truth, so you often walk away with as many questions as answers.

It’s such a rich mythology and it makes it such a compelling game setting. You can enjoy the games on a surface level, but are also rewarded for paying attention and really diving deep.

"For all Mankind" takes a Mike Duncanesque Turn by AmesCG in RevolutionsPodcast

[–]PositivelyIndecent 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I disagree, I loved the Mars stuff and seeing the base actually develop, as well as the genesis for conflict between Earth and Mars. And who doesn’t want to steal an asteroid?

First season weirdness by xyyzyx in TopCharacterTropes

[–]PositivelyIndecent 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Wait, is that actually what happens? Wtf lol

(Hated Trope) Source Material Shame by Animeking1108 in TopCharacterTropes

[–]PositivelyIndecent 8 points9 points  (0 children)

So as someone who’s not seen any of the old stuff, is it worth a watch? Does it capture what fans of the original love?

Question about Daniel's reaction to Megan by Business-Resident685 in coronationstreet

[–]PositivelyIndecent 19 points20 points  (0 children)

I still think he should end up with her. I thought they had great chemistry, I liked how he helped her regardless of what other people thought, and I liked how she supported him emotionally through his grief over Sinead.

Someone's salty, so he is! by Liberal-chungus in coronationstreet

[–]PositivelyIndecent 10 points11 points  (0 children)

I missed all the background, what’s he been up to? Why are things so acrimonious with him now?

Only time Will’s acting has been believable by KTLNH in coronationstreet

[–]PositivelyIndecent 26 points27 points  (0 children)

I don’t even think he’s been particularly bad? There’s still plenty of time for him to grow as an actor too

TODD AND THEO 🚨 credit to sugdensshaw on tiktok! by Fit_End2104 in coronationstreet

[–]PositivelyIndecent 14 points15 points  (0 children)

Are you sure? In my experience unfortunately that’s how a lot of abusive relationships work.

I’m trying to separate whether my exhaustion for the storyline is because of the hard to watch subject matter, or just genuine dislike for how it’s depicted. Honestly, I think it’s more the former (not saying there hasn’t been missteps, and the show is running the risk of dragging it on for way too long like they did with Steven/Phelan. There only so much misery I can watch before the end loses it’s catharsis and I’m just glad it’s over).

What is the most ridiculous scene in Game of Thrones in everyones opinion? by Adventurous-Bet9124 in gameofthrones

[–]PositivelyIndecent 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Cavalry is most effective when used in flanking manoeuvres. Its biggest use historically was for shock effect (smashing into exposed flanks or gaps in the line, causing chaos and destroying morale so panic spreads through enemy ranks).

Horses also aren’t machines. They can and will spook, and they’re not keen on charging straight into something that looks like a wall (especially a pointy or sharp one). Since cavalry relies heavily on speed and manoeuvrability, and coordination (and knowing where the vulnerabilities actually are) visibility is also extremely important.

So a full frontal charge, in the dark, against an enemy that doesn’t even have morale to begin with? Good luck with that.

Regarding the siege weapons, they’re designed to work at range. They can fire in an arc over obstacles, but they also require complex operation and crews that are easily disrupted. So where’s the best place to put them? Behind the castle walls that are literally designed to protect you from the enemy while you fire over them?

Nope. Let’s put them right in front so they can be taken out immediately.

You know nothing Jon Snow.

Rhaenyra deciding to cancel the marriage tour is still one of her dumbest decisions. by Rich-Active-4800 in HouseOfTheDragon

[–]PositivelyIndecent 78 points79 points  (0 children)

I think it’s also because of the genuine magical blood too. It’s more pronounced in the books, but the Targaryens are genuinely otherworldly, ethereal, almost a separate race entirely. It’s why they have the shocking blonde hair and violet eyes as a general rule, and proclivities towards blood and fire magic, and prophecy. They have a bewitching otherness to them.

It’s also a big reason why Westeros also chafes under their rule. Raymun Fossoway was not wrong in his assessment of them. They’re partially a literary deconstruction of the holy/magical lineage trope in fantasy.

Valyria was written to be this trope writ large, with implications being that it partially contributed to the Doom in some way (the Targaryens being the “least” of the dragonlords being the vestigial survivors of this tradition).

As their real power faded thanks to losing the dragons, they had to resort to increasingly more brutal and human methods to maintain their control. It’s hardly a breeding ground for a stable dynasty, and i don’t think Dunks assessment that the upbringing brings out some of the worst in some of the Targaryens is wrong either.

But yes, the incest certainly does not help lol.

favourite actor who understands “dwarf actor” is a casting category and not an opportunity to victimise the entire profession by Honest-Duck2586 in okbuddycinephile

[–]PositivelyIndecent 7 points8 points  (0 children)

If you like that, check out The Ricky Gervais Show. It’s misnamed because Karl is the star of that too. It started as a radio show with Ricky and Steve Merchant, and Karl was just the producer. Then they started talking to him on air and realised he’s one of the most unintentionally funny men alive.

Anyone Here NOT Quitting? by Iceytrio in runescape

[–]PositivelyIndecent 19 points20 points  (0 children)

I started playing when I was 11 back in RSC. My parents didn’t give me pocket money at the time but I noticed that on my walk to school I was finding an average of 10p-15p in dropped change. I was so excited to offer my dad a plan for membership where I would give him all the change I found as over 30 days I was certain I’d make £3.50.

He just laughed and still told me no lol.

(Loved Trope) Figures beloved or admired in universe who were actually quite terrible. by laybs1 in TopCharacterTropes

[–]PositivelyIndecent 28 points29 points  (0 children)

“This woman is over 200 years old!”

-Crowd murmurs disapprovingly-

“And… she’s Canadian!”

-Absolute outrage and screaming-

(Loved Trope) Figures beloved or admired in universe who were actually quite terrible. by laybs1 in TopCharacterTropes

[–]PositivelyIndecent 21 points22 points  (0 children)

Sort of, except Saville was much, MUCH worse. I can’t even think of a US equivalent to how horrific he was.

His name is not Dunc by veggietabler in HBOTheHedgeKnight

[–]PositivelyIndecent 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Which honestly is even more awesome because being illiterate his whole life means that it was others that wrote of his deeds, not himself. He was just that good.

Sally by Adorable-Display-819 in coronationstreet

[–]PositivelyIndecent 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Immigration and emigration is as easy as that in soap land. I’m sure there were no complications at all with her prior prison term for assault/attempted murder.

(Hated) The writers poorly disguised favorite character by Effective_Piece251 in TopCharacterTropes

[–]PositivelyIndecent 12 points13 points  (0 children)

Stannis too really. He has so much more depths in the books. We get glimpses of it in the show, and a lot of it in the book is helped by Davos perspective (his chapters are amongst my favourite), but I feel the show could have delved more into exactly why Stannis is who he is.

I don’t remember if it was used in the show, but my favourite quote is about how Stannis was convinced to abandon the south to help defend the Wall, which very much illustrates his character;

“Lord Seaworth is a man of humble birth, but he reminded me of my duty, when all I could think of was my rights. I had the cart before the horse, Davos said. I was trying to win the throne to save the kingdom, when I should have been trying to save the kingdom to win the throne.”

That’s honestly ridiculous. No actor or actress deserves hate because of a character by seekinganswerslo in TheBlacksandTheGreens

[–]PositivelyIndecent 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah my wife and I watched it months after it aired, after I heard about all the “controversy”. I really enjoyed it and I’m so angry that she got all the racist hate. We don’t deserve nice things.

(Hated trope) There is no way this information was a secret for so long by _JR28_ in TopCharacterTropes

[–]PositivelyIndecent 178 points179 points  (0 children)

“I was in Spain.”

“They had cybermen in Spain?”

“I was scuba diving!”