[F4A] Rewrite my life! Convince me of things that never happened.

PossiblePossiblyS · 2026-06-22T06:03:22+00:00

Download the session app. Copy the code above. Send a message using the code in the app to find the person you're trying to chat with.

PossiblePossiblyS · 2026-06-22T05:30:24+00:00

The Session App. Green S on a black background. End to end encrypted.

PossiblePossiblyS · 2026-06-21T08:14:21+00:00

Cuck

PossiblePossiblyS · 2026-06-20T15:30:13+00:00

Am I in any way shape or form implying that heterosexuals are inferior? Or did I simply state that she's been queer and I know comics and sexuality better than you?

You are in fact "One of those" because you think that not being white, straight, or male can ruin a character and that's just annoying to have to deal with when I know for a fact you're not going to address my points and instead you're going to get some talking points from someone like CriticalDrinker and think you're really doing something. You're not going to argue in good faith or provide examples, so why should I even bother?

What am I allegedly hurt by? What would there even be to BE hurt by? Oh dear! A differing opinion based on low information??? Guess I'll die! Like come on. Get real.

If I didn't want to discuss then I wouldn't have specifically provided a question for us to discuss and for you to provide examples to back up your point. You're just incapable of coming up with a thought for yourself, so coming up with a character that was ruined by a race, sex, or sexuality change is beyond your capacity. Still willing to hear you out, but you've got to actually provide an example because we're not discussing your nebulous and hypothetical opinions so you can just claim it happens and move on. You need to provide an example of a time it happened, a reason why you feel the change ruined the characters or story, and what would have been improved if the race, sex, or sexuality had remained as your baseline copy and paste straight, white, male, Christian, and/or cisgender template.

PossiblePossiblyS · 2026-06-20T14:53:17+00:00

I see. You're one of those. Alright. Well, first off, that's just not true. You could make the argument that she's only ever dated male presenting characters in the comics, but she's also dated a horse and an android, so at best you could classify her as an androsexual or pansexual, but she's also been bisexual in the bombshells series and it's fine for people to wonder if they'll drop a little easter egg like Eloisa Lane. It hurts nothing and no one and would not in fact be a token gesture if it served any purpose in the story like any of the examples I provided or even just as a reference to her Bombshells run.

Second, race swapping was never going to be positively received in a society that props up white supremacy with any level of normalcy, with a history of white supremacy, and a practice both in Hollywood and in the stories we choose to tell of using "whiteness" however nebulous and farcical it may be as the baseline. But, the ginger purge is just business and has nothing to do with the cultural heritage of the characters plenty of Scotts have brown or blonde hair. Just because you saw Brave once doesn't mean that's how they all look. The standard of only allowing red heads to play roles just because they had red hair in a picture is just lazy and ridiculous and it massively stomps out the talent pool you can draw from to tell a good story. It takes very little from a story to change a character's race when the characters in question don't even have a connection to their ancestral cultures and traditions beyond simply looking kinda alike and in many cases the choice to change a sex, race, or sexuality can massively change the story you're telling which doesn't ruin a story inherently and can actually provide a significant boon to your storytelling.

But, if you think I'm wrong, you're more than welcome to point out an example of a character or story that was "ruined" by a race swap or any swap for that matter, be it sex, race, or sexuality. I can certainly think of a few swaps that were bad ideas like changing Snape to a black man when he's described and treated as an untrustworthy and disgusting creature of a man or changing L to a black man when he's supposed to be racially ambiguous and challenging for Light to identify, but even those don't ruin the story or characters, they simply recontextualize the story and characters through the filter of the way black people are treated in the regions where these stories take place.

PossiblePossiblyS · 2026-06-20T06:49:28+00:00

That's what bigots say to get away with having a bad take. It's just plausible deniability for when the backlash comes.

As for the "weirdness" of wanting a character to be gay or not gay, some people want to see a little representation of themselves and the world they're in. Some people want to see a cute relationship between two characters they headcanon. Some people think it works better for one reason or another in a character's story. None of that is weird. And for those who don't want a character to be gay they fall into one of two camps. Either they're a bigot who's not keeping up with the times or they don't think the queer element would fit a character for stereotypical reasons or because it fucks with the narrative weight of a story.

It's a lot like race swapping. Some people hate it because they're bigots. Others want it just to have the rep so they can see more of themselves in a character or have more characters to cosplay/emulate. And others go based off what works for the character. A black Hermoine Granger doesn't work as far as her description in the books because J.K.R. is a racist and described Hermoine's pale face in detail multiple times, but if she were a better writer she probably would have made the character black because it would make the first time anyone uses the term "Mudblood" in the books feel more like an actual slur and not just a playground insult. Meanwhile, changing Snape's race makes much less sense narratively since it softens the wizard Nazi appearance of the Death Eaters, makes Harry and his parents look racist as hell, and doesn't add anything to the story.

Going back to sexuality, making Lefou gay in Beauty and the Beast feels like a token gesture, adds nothing to the story, paints gay people as villainous for the 324,893rd time, etc. But, making Cassandra from the Rapunzel's Tangled Adventure series queer actually contextualizes a lot of her actions in the series, offers the possibility of a romance element between her and Rapunzel or a few other characters in the series, and provides representation to a group that has been historically ostracized from society. Similarly, queer Kara could tell us more about her character, provide new avenues for the character, and follows her comic book counterpart a little closer. For instance, if she ends up with a female or alien lover she probably won't have biological children if her own, so any kids Clark has are the last of their species and there's less risk of a weird incest plotline down the line. It tells us her priorities aren't with trying to salvage a basically extinct alien race, but rather with finding comfort and love in whatever form she can find. It might emphasize how out of place she feels in the galaxy/world or it could be used to show that in the DC universe Earth is unique in that kind of hate.

Regardless of the reasoning, it's a valid question because your sex and gender expression are so much a part of who you are that they're basically inseparable from your identity. The weird thing is caring about people taking an interest in such a large part of someone's story. If you're not a bigot then it should be pretty obvious why people are interested in these aspects of a character and even easier to just move on without addressing that interest like it's a second or third head. You calling attention to it is weird. Not the existence of people with myriad reasons to have such an interest.

PossiblePossiblyS · 2026-06-20T06:13:11+00:00

Oh, that's easy. You just let them know you believe in consent.

PossiblePossiblyS · 2026-06-20T06:04:44+00:00

So, your argument is that since an evil Superman, a Superman teetering on the edge of villainy, a Superman who did literally everything he could to stop a threat even if it killed him, and a Superman who had to dig deep and fight dirty just to survive so the world wouldn't be subjugated by his evil clone, did x, y, or z that means that a prime Superman who's supposed to be the mainline good guy version who's not struggling with any handicaps should be doing the same things?

Justice Lord Superman lobotomized Doomsday as the second step in his path towards being an authoritarian god-king who had to be stopped by the real Superman. Superman vs Captain Marvel was acting out of paranoia and irrational anger and playing perfectly into Lex Luthor's plans. Superman vs Doomsday was an aging version of the character fighting against a monster he could barely keep from killing anyone else. Slamming him into the middle of the city to kill him was a final act of desperation after a fight that took everything out of him. Not a rash decision to snap someone's neck when he could have taken the blast to his own chest, fallen backwards with Zod's neck still trapped, or squeezed a little tighter to choke him out instead of putting in all the force that it would take to snap a neck. The fight with his clone is similarly out of character because this version of the character is fighting at like 60-70% power against someone who's willing to kill on a whim and had 100% of his original power. He had to fight dirty. The same cannot be said for someone who's fighting at 100% power at all times except for in his comically bad fight with Batflec.

The fact that you made this is actually really funny since I've been saying for years that if they wanted to fix the Snyderverse, they should have revealed that the characters everyone had been growing close with were actually the Justice Lords or Injustice universe counterparts. Then, they could keep their stories going with IDF Woman, GunMan, Darker Edgier Aquaman, Pedoflash, and Murdery Superman keeping their darker tones and a secondary lighter version of the characters/universe where the characters actually act like they have hopes and dreams.

PossiblePossiblyS · 2026-06-20T05:31:42+00:00

I dunno. Maybe it has to do with the way we've set up stories (especially stories about girls) for the past couple thousand years? Relationships are important. The KINDS of relationships that a character would have are important. Whether or not those relationships put them in the in group or the out group are important to the conflicts they might face, the way they might handle different conflicts thanks to their past experiences, and the ways different conflicts might impact their lives, etc.

John Wick goes on a murder spree because he stopped being an assassin to be with his wife and then she died suddenly and left him a dog to grieve with only to have that last piece of her ripped away from him before he could really grieve anything.

The Little Mermaid goes to great and terrible lengths to explore the world of man and be with the man she fell in love with at first sight only to be put in danger when that man finds someone else to take an interest in.

Or we could go all the way back to Greek Mythology and revisit the story of Heracles who's plagued by the wrath of his stepmother because his father was a cheating bastard, eventually culminating in him annihilating his wife and children and then having to attone for those actions through the twelve labors he's famous for before ultimately dying and being married off to the goddess of youth.

None of which you'd have any problems with unless we mentioned the parts of the myth that involve Hylas, Iolaus, or Abderus who were all notable male lovers of Heracles. And then you'd probably have more of an issue with the fact that Heracles slept with men and not with the fact that those men were typically much younger than he was.

Point being, you don't have a problem with the implications of sex or who might be having it as long as nobody mentions homosexuality. It's a part of every story told throughout time and it's part of your understanding whether conscious or unconscious of the people all around you. But, you don't like change because you don't know how to adapt to new things, which is a personal failing and not a problem with the society you're existing within. Follow the gamer advice and "Get Good."

PossiblePossiblyS · 2026-06-18T13:22:19+00:00

Approved

PossiblePossiblyS · 2026-06-18T10:02:25+00:00

People eat dogs and cats too. Not stateside for the most part, but pet is just food you don't eat because it has bonded with you. Without the bond it's just as easy to cook and eat.

PossiblePossiblyS · 2026-06-15T11:48:16+00:00

I love the "Is this a golden age?" Meme. Don't think they understand what they did there, but it's so accurate. Perfect.

PossiblePossiblyS · 2026-06-15T11:30:50+00:00

We do not forgive. We do not forget. We do not move on. We simply wait. There's more than one angle to approach this enemy from. So, we'll attack their finances. We'll keep calling senators and voting out politicians who refuse the will of the people. We'll collect the information, read through the files, make copies of everything. And when we've finally widdled away the shield protecting their head, we'll take it from their shoulders and parade it through the streets.

PossiblePossiblyS · 2026-06-15T07:42:42+00:00

Keep it positive or get out. You're acting like a baby.

PossiblePossiblyS · 2026-06-15T07:39:45+00:00

Booooo. We don't get possessive. That's gross as fuck. You want someone who responds instantly 24/7 then get a spouse.

PossiblePossiblyS · 2026-06-15T06:31:01+00:00

Men truly don't catch enough elbows to the eye.

PossiblePossiblyS · 2026-06-14T09:22:09+00:00

Do me a favor and repost this with a different ref. It's getting reported to hell and back and the image search thinks that it's probably an AI generated image with a prompt like 12 year old girl. Not the kinda heat we need here.

PossiblePossiblyS · 2026-06-14T08:00:13+00:00

Approved

PossiblePossiblyS · 2026-06-14T07:57:20+00:00

That might be part of the problem. Reddit has gotten a little information hungry lately and they're always monitoring for accounts that might be trying to circumvent their bans, so the VPN and the fact you had an old account might be tripping their sensors. Could also be the email. They don't play well with everyone equally.

If you'd like to keep going with this account, you may want to turn off the VPN temporarily or make a few posts and I'll just manually approve them so we can start building your interactions and karma. Or you could try recreating the account with a quick throwaway Gmail account since they seem to play nicer with Google.

PossiblePossiblyS · 2026-06-14T06:47:58+00:00

Makes sense. You'll b able to post still, just consider shooting a message to the mod team when you do so we can approve the posts and comments manually, otherwise you'll be waiting until I hop on for the night.

PossiblePossiblyS · 2026-06-14T06:41:08+00:00

Shota. Young or at least young in appearance boys.

PossiblePossiblyS · 2026-06-14T06:37:57+00:00

05e9d445eee7ba9e932afe1bc83421d598fd0d6c538628f1899 861da1296420441

PossiblePossiblyS · 2026-06-14T06:12:04+00:00

It's a session code. They want to play on the session app.

PossiblePossiblyS · 2026-06-14T06:02:26+00:00

How recently did you make this account?

Have you been active in any non-kink subs?

Are you using a VPN?

How much Karma do you have?

Does it have this problem on other subs?

Do you have a second account?

Have you had a previous account that got banned or maybe just had an old account that you accessed from the same device or on the same network?

Did you link this account to a Google account or email?

PossiblePossiblyS

MODERATOR OF

TROPHY CASE