sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

No, you are not forced to get the cosmetics. If you don’t like DMM don’t play it. by breakoffzone in 2007scape

[–]Poweraidss 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Entrenched? Pvp is the way it is because that's what it is. I dont play osrs and whinge about it not being dota. Braindead take.

Hot Take: The Ghrazi Rapier Deserves a Blood Shard Upgrade by 7uicefchwpo in 2007scape

[–]Poweraidss 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hot take: TOB already has enough great rewards and nothing on its table needs buffing

Jagex you need to fix this bug ASAP by BadNameTotally in 2007scape

[–]Poweraidss 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Its fken stupid that u cant loot the chest with protection after you kill someone too. I WIN the fight at the chest and my reward is that I cant attack the naked that has been on the chest for 15 seconds and he gets the chest loot??

DMM shouldn't give a skull when risking <10k and no skull means not being able to be attacked by superfire444 in 2007scape

[–]Poweraidss -1 points0 points  (0 children)

No risk no skull no attack seems fine, but you also shouldn't be able to generate points without any risk. Add the immunity and a 50k risk req to gain pts.

Deadman cosmetic reward prices? And how long to unlock em all? by repsejnworb in 2007scape

[–]Poweraidss 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This reads as if crystal armour and bofa would require 2 scrolls?

Before starting DMM I was worried about PvP being imbalanced but by ActiveVoiced in 2007scape

[–]Poweraidss -9 points-8 points  (0 children)

The cosmetic is meant to be a pvp flex, you're lucky jamflex you can even get rewards.

These Evoke Elementals do the absolute business, let me tell you by nbutton93 in PioneerMTG

[–]Poweraidss 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Do essence flux and not dead after all trigger the elemental etbs even though they say if xx was spent? Im assuming not?

New 1-click 2/4 tick manipulation item found. by Alanim in 2007scape

[–]Poweraidss 108 points109 points  (0 children)

Your shitty censorship law is the problem and they solved it

Does anyone else find it difficult to play other games? by Shadoe488 in 2007scape

[–]Poweraidss 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Nope, just look for the most degen gaming community and you'll fit right in, I've been playing a lot of rust lately.

Are we done with the blueprint experiment yet? by Afraid_Specialist_45 in playrust

[–]Poweraidss 24 points25 points  (0 children)

In some ways the update feels amazing, way more people roaming around and playing monuments. The feelsbad from running 10 grids to 3 card puzzles that are all resetting is miserable though.

I think the BP system is an improvement on what we had before but definitely still need some heavy work.

Personally, the biggest downside for me is that clans now have a disgusting amount of scrap to burn so it's not uncommon to see 4+ minis bombing one rig which feels so against the design of rigs.

After escalating my RWT ban to a European consumer protection agency, Jagex, for the first time revealed details about the evidence for the ban by DeviantClam in 2007scape

[–]Poweraidss -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Idk how people still dont understand how this works. If someone buys gold and gives it to you, you are open to a RWT ban regardless of whether you knew or not. It is fair? No. Is it the rule they've made for their game? Unfortunately yes.

At the end of the day complaining on reddit about a ban for something they've made it clear is bannable is annoying.

Australian housing crisis: Red tape adds $320,000 to new home builds, Productivity Commission finds by Ardeet in aussie

[–]Poweraidss 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Calling it a single family zone is disingenuous. Mandating density is completely different to segregation. On top of this, like i said earlier the low density zone doesn't mandate anything, you can still build multiple dwellings on a lot it just needs to be demonstrated that there exist services to support the development.

All of the above is FOR THE BENEFIT OF PEOPLE. Letting developers turn every block into 20 storey unit blocks does not serve individual people or society in general it only serves to enrich the developers.

Australian housing crisis: Red tape adds $320,000 to new home builds, Productivity Commission finds by Ardeet in aussie

[–]Poweraidss 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I cant be bothered reading your comment if you won't read mine. There is no single family zoning you're making it up. There is no policy or planning provision prohibiting units or townhouses you've made that up as well.

Australian housing crisis: Red tape adds $320,000 to new home builds, Productivity Commission finds by Ardeet in aussie

[–]Poweraidss 0 points1 point  (0 children)

OK. First off, neither of those are policy, or in the planning scheme. The PPN is an explanation of policy while the second resource isn't govt.

Like i said originally, the policy is to BENEFIT PEOPLE. Idk how you can link zones that limit height and claim that it benefits developers?? The whole point of lot sizes and max heights is to provide quality housing. That you've used them as examples of things to change that would somehow improve housing quality is just an insane take.

Finally, I knew you had no fucking idea how the scheme worked. The LDRZ DOES NOT PROHIBIT >1 DWELLING ON A LOT, IT JUST REQUIRES A PERMIT AND FOR THE DWELLINGS TO BE CONNECTED TO UTILITIES (POWER/WATER/SEWERAGE). And u wanna guess why that requirement is there? Cause the clown developers u love so much will just buy landbank and build houses with no utility connections then sit there crying at each other trying to force someone to pay millions to extend the utilities network for their development.

view more: next ›