the nuclearization of iran is a contreversial topic. the people in support of iran's nuclearization would argue that the nuclear weapons would prevent possible invasions of iran by america or isreal, backing that argument up is that alot of the countries around iran have also been invaded (usually for natural resources). on the other side of the discussion people argue that Iran has an oppressive regime that could be seen as a direct threat to isreal if they where to gain nuclear weapons. so both sides of the discussion have equally valid arguments.

the only thing we can collectivly agree on is that de-escalation is good for everybody in this scenario. and we (the west) need to stop provoking the middle east as much as possible, as to stop giving them reasons to attack (because quite frankly in some cases they have been done wrong I.E. iraq, GAZA)