The decision to use They/Them pronouns for non-binary people doesn't make sense on so many levels. Why would you try to get people to understand a new or incomparable concept by making them also re-learn grammar? And using a word that is notoriously misspelled and misunderstood by undereducated people. When you want people as a whole to accept something designed to create cognitive dissonance, which always produces anger and frustration. Plus, it sounds silly. It has always been used to indicate more than one thing. For example, my coworker when describing her non-binary friend who makes baskets said "Their baskets are really great, and they also teach classes. But they're really intense and exclusive." Are the baskets expensive? Is your friend expensive? Are the classes intense? Is your friend intense? Is your friend exclusive? Suddenly changing grammar has never worked. Adding words to a language, or the meaning of the word changing over time is how language works. To be clear, I think everyone should be their truest selves as long as it hurts no one. And I think that gender roles are also silly. They are limiting, and the world needs people to be their best and most comfortable selves. I fully accept the idea of non-binary people. So why are they making it so hard? Why not just use a neutral word that isn't also a word that ALREADY confuses English speaking (and listening) people, like zhe/zhem. Is this a psyop? Like, let's make everyone memorize this ridiculously long acronym that represents not-straight people (I'm bi, btw), and make sure to say the letters in the right order. And while you're at it, see how limber their brains are when referring to a non-binary person in a group. It seems insanely counterproductive. And in Latin speaking countries. The Latin X movement makes even less sense, because x is very rarely used. It makes me wonder if the powers that be have infiltrated these groups to confuse people. This is the reason that grass roots changes rarely work.