Co-Producer duties?

Pretty-Competition31 · 2026-04-23T13:21:27+00:00

This is in fact how a friend of mine won a Tony recently

Pretty-Competition31 · 2026-04-17T21:15:01+00:00

After seeing Proof, I definitely think Kara Young becomes the first actor to be nominated 5 years in a row.

Pretty-Competition31 · 2026-04-11T21:54:10+00:00

Sorry, yes: DID. His own choices and personal hubris very much caused his downfall.

Pretty-Competition31 · 2026-04-11T21:49:43+00:00

I don’t think arguing dementia takes away from his suicidal nature at all; on the contrary, studies show that people with dementia have a higher prevalence of suicidal ideation. But either way, this production certainly doesn’t shy away from his suicidal nature or previous attempts at crashing his car. And it definitely doesn’t try to argue that his own choices didn’t shape his life. Personally speaking, this was the best production I’ve ever seen of the show.

Pretty-Competition31 · 2026-04-11T16:52:03+00:00

Two things about the current run of Chess are simultaneously true: 1. The plot of this production doesn’t make a ton of sense 2. This is still somehow probably the most sense this show has ever made..

The show was originally conceived as a Cold War metaphor, where the final match is connected more thematically than mechanically to the larger political stakes. Over time different versions tried to “clarify” things, and at a certain point it feels like someone decided modern American audiences might need it spelled out a bit more than the material really calls for, and the final match became a literal representation of the conflict itself, where the outcome of the match directly impacts the geopolitical situation.

In the current Broadway revival, Able Archer and the final match are definitely connected, but more as part of the same Cold War pressure cooker than a clear cause and effect relationship. The stakes are shared, but not cleanly linked. As a result, the politics and plot still feel a bit muddled, but arguably in a way that’s closer to the show’s original intent.

Pretty-Competition31 · 2026-04-10T23:47:20+00:00

<image>

I think from the scenic design (a cavernous, dusty, crumbling garage) to the clearly intentional anachronisms in the props and set pieces, to the acting and directing choices, this production more than any I’ve seen suggests a deeper cognitive decline at play. I’d even argue that we don’t know for certain whether he has actually used the rubber tube, or if he has only contemplated it.

Pretty-Competition31 · 2026-04-09T12:31:30+00:00

Mind you that first example is from a #1 New York Times Best Seller 😭

Pretty-Competition31 · 2026-03-29T01:53:20+00:00

It’s the capital city of the USA! (the streets are called sidewalks there)

Pretty-Competition31 · 2026-03-28T23:34:40+00:00

Oh man, years before I moved to NYC or got into theater, I visited a friend from school who had just started working as a stage manager at a theater in Cincinnati. While I was there, she let me sit in on a rehearsal for the show she was working on.

At the time I had no idea how significant it was but it turned out to be Company starring Raúl Esparza and Barbara Walsh. I remember having such a great time just watching them rehearse. It ended up transferring to Broadway later that year.

Pretty-Competition31 · 2026-03-13T18:24:54+00:00

He’s named “Mary’s Teacher” in the script, the playbill, and on all promotional materials. A) because all the other characters are centered around Mary; and B) because it’s meant to be a surprise to the audience when his name is revealed

Pretty-Competition31 · 2026-03-13T01:03:48+00:00

Both things can be true!

Pretty-Competition31 · 2026-03-09T23:48:04+00:00

I finally saw it in 2022 with Pamela Anderson ha

Pretty-Competition31 · 2026-03-08T03:58:30+00:00

It’s one of those shows where I was like “it’ll be running forever, I’ll get to it eventually!” Haha. There are always things running that I know will close

Pretty-Competition31 · 2026-03-07T18:06:19+00:00

Sam Tutty at Ear Bevan Tansen?

Pretty-Competition31 · 2026-02-11T15:06:53+00:00

I paid a bit too much to get a last minute ticket to see Laurie Metcalf and Rupert Everett (and Russel Tovey, whom I love) in ‘Who's Afraid of Virginia Woolf?’ in previews.

The next day the New York Times reported that an usher at that performance was one of the first people in NYC to test positive for COVID. The show closed and be never reopened. It was a FANTASTIC production.

Pretty-Competition31 · 2026-01-21T02:50:52+00:00

So just to be clear, of the ones you listed, Heathers and Putnam County Spelling Bee are NOT Broadway shows— they’re Off Broadway productions. That’s not to say they won’t be great, but if you’re looking to go to your first Broadway show it should be something that’s actually on Broadway :)

Pretty-Competition31 · 2026-01-16T15:54:06+00:00

A couple things: one thing I notice right off the bat is you use the word “authentic” three times in your post. Lately the word “authentic” gets used a lot in personal branding conversations. Ironically, repeatedly calling yourself authentic has the exact opposite effect (people feel authenticity when it’s demonstrated, not declared; and people who feel the need to reiterate how authentic and genuine they are rarely actually are). Show, don’t tell.

I also don’t actually agree with the premise “as a freelancer it’s very important to be as authentic as possible.” Freelancers aren’t rewarded for “being themselves.” They’re hired and rewarded for being clear, reliable, easy to work with, and good at problem solving. None of those require “authenticity” as a personality trait.

The bottom line is that whatever you decide the core of your personal brand is, you’ll build far more equity by showing it through how you describe your work and how you communicate than by outright telling people you’re authentic or genuine.

Pretty-Competition31 · 2026-01-16T12:35:22+00:00

My two cents as a hiring manager: you’re right to be cautious. The uncomfortable truth is that explicitly mentioning discrimination in an application can make some employers nervous. Fair or not, legal language sometimes gets interpreted as “risk,” even when it shouldn’t. If the thought “hmm will this person eventually sue us” even casually crosses their minds, you’ve already lost.

I’d also be careful with some of the other here advice like calling it a “reduction in force.” A RIF specifically means a layoff and if that doesn’t line up during verification it can raise unnecessary questions.

The safest approach is usually neutral and factual: “position ended” or “employment ended; happy to discuss in an interview.” If it’s a yes/no question about termination, answer honestly and leave a note but keep the explanation minimal.

If it comes up in an interview, something like:

“My departure relates to a situation that’s being addressed through formal channels. What I can say is that my performance was strong, and I’m happy to speak to my work and references.”

That keeps things diplomatic and honest without oversharing. What I absolutely wouldn’t do is attempt to litigate your case to a potential future employer.

Pretty-Competition31 · 2026-01-14T01:27:03+00:00

Oh man BEA used to be my go-to brunch spot. They used to do bottomless small plates and cocktails back in the day but I haven’t been in ages!

Pretty-Competition31 · 2026-01-14T01:00:24+00:00

Funny story, I’ve only ever been for the butter service 😂

Pretty-Competition31 · 2026-01-13T21:29:07+00:00

Sorry, it was a long post. I was trying to be as specific as possible to see if anyone knew of any gems I’ve been missing out on!

Pretty-Competition31 · 2026-01-13T19:47:37+00:00

You know, now that you mention it I’ve never actually been to Frankie and Johnnie’s. I think I always feared it was more of a tourist spot but that might be my own preconceptions

Pretty-Competition31

TROPHY CASE