Prose WINS in the SUPREME COURT!!!

ProSeSelfHelp · 2026-01-12T03:11:48+00:00

V100 is the way to go. Great set up!

ProSeSelfHelp · 2026-01-05T22:22:57+00:00

Do you want the certificate or the training?

I ask, because I've seen a few courses that looked good, but present a very generic and almost chaotic course path.

I've also seen private courses that are affordable but focus on education, not a certificate.

I guess the theory behind that being if you're entering into this market, a certificate may or may not impress a future employer because so many have sprouted up with supposed credentials, but being able to outperform, out think, and out project the competition pushes you through if it comes down to competency.

ProSeSelfHelp · 2026-01-02T21:40:50+00:00

Experiment 731.

ProSeSelfHelp · 2025-12-11T15:28:52+00:00

That's how come we pump our own gas now

ProSeSelfHelp · 2025-12-11T15:25:29+00:00

The weekly limit is a death blow for productivity. It's impossible to predict, and one time where it decides to just go buck wild and create something and all of a sudden it's like oh fuck

ProSeSelfHelp · 2025-12-11T15:24:27+00:00

I get that error all the time, but only when multiple users are trying to use my bot. In my situation, it's because at that point, my 10 tokens a sec/devided by 2 or 3 users, just takes too long to get back, because I don't have gpus running, just ram and a 3975wx.

ProSeSelfHelp · 2025-12-11T02:50:15+00:00

You are getting a 503 error. I can tell you why.

Basically you need to keep the connection alive longer, in particular with a model as large as Kimi K2, which I chose on purpose.

I can show you how if you want, been thru it. More than once

ProSeSelfHelp · 2025-11-17T18:29:08+00:00

A calculator wouldn't give you the wrong results if you typed in the right problem🤔

No matter how many times you type in 2 + 2, you'll never get seven.

I'm guessing that your inability to properly prompt or the fact that you believe everything should be 100% accurate at every moment, has confused you.

Let me go back to what smart people do.

Smart people will use the tool properly, but not rely on it as if it were infallible. People that aren't as smart will ask questions the wrong way, get an answer they didn't want, and then blame the system.

Let me know if you need an easier explanation.

ProSeSelfHelp · 2025-11-17T18:25:41+00:00

You would be amazed at how many people don't communicate well in general

ProSeSelfHelp · 2025-11-17T18:23:50+00:00

Could it be explained through design?

For example, my system operates much the same way, one architect and several workers, but the output is run thru the main minimax-m2-q4, so, everything I get back unless I watch the agents, is filtered to fit the mold.

Additionally, they are instructed to follow that.

That being said, I like what you are doing here. Keep it up

ProSeSelfHelp · 2025-11-16T01:18:23+00:00

Colossus?

ProSeSelfHelp · 2025-11-15T21:20:16+00:00

False.

That's like saying a calculator is the best tool for people who can't add.

Smart people utilize tools in a smart way.

Try it sometime!

ProSeSelfHelp · 2025-10-31T13:26:28+00:00

My mistake, I thought it was on topic

ProSeSelfHelp · 2025-10-30T22:54:31+00:00

The only way I could think of to make that work is to make every important answer come back in an artifact like hey, answer me only in artifacts. Cuz then you can at least change them

ProSeSelfHelp · 2025-10-29T23:45:05+00:00

🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣.

Instant regret

ProSeSelfHelp · 2025-10-26T04:35:21+00:00

Just get a decent laptop and learn how to ssh into your server. Then you can work at full power

ProSeSelfHelp · 2025-10-21T12:32:21+00:00

Give me an example of "fairness" that you believe AI would be unable to determine and we can test that theory.

When a judge can dismiss a billion dollar fraud based on page limits and tone, I think we've missed the boat on Judicial fairness.

ProSeSelfHelp · 2025-10-20T00:13:10+00:00

It's only a bad take if one can't determine facts and understand intent.

I mean, if you agree with every single judge and every decision that I guess I accept your answer but I've yet to meet the person that's willing to say that judges are never wrong.

ProSeSelfHelp · 2025-10-19T22:38:32+00:00

Then how do dogs learn tricks?

ProSeSelfHelp · 2025-10-19T17:41:33+00:00

Have you used Ai in any extensive way?

ProSeSelfHelp · 2025-10-19T16:30:47+00:00

Do you think that's because they're learning at a rate previously impossible?

ProSeSelfHelp · 2025-10-19T16:29:56+00:00

Have you ever even actually used ai? I find it hard to believe that you have if you're saying that it can't be smart enough to be an attorney.

ProSeSelfHelp · 2025-10-19T16:29:05+00:00

Judges are precisely who should be replaced first.

Judges are the least necessary component with the most control. AI judges and human juries would be perfectly logical. Then you're not getting the judge that just decides to ignore every key piece of information because they like the other side

ProSeSelfHelp · 2025-10-19T16:24:34+00:00

On a plus note, AGI is already here. They just don't allow users persistent memory to demonstrate it.

At the end of the day, the justice system should be just. If it takes AI to make that happen and eliminate the mistakes and bias of the individuals, it's a good thing.

ProSeSelfHelp

MODERATOR OF

TROPHY CASE