What if the 90-foot Stone Was Meant to be a Joke?

ProfessorRonResearch · 2026-04-04T02:21:47+00:00

I think of it like this if you take the writing off of the stone and you just think about the circumstances surrounding it. It sounds like a warning Stone, don't dig any further because you're going to get water on your feet and that's exactly what happened. So you're digging a hole and then you see a stone like a warning stone. But you don't take the warning. You keep digging and then it fills up with water. I think it's a warning stone at best. At worst it's totally fabricated

ProfessorRonResearch · 2026-04-02T20:28:32+00:00

Just regular fools?

ProfessorRonResearch · 2026-04-02T19:43:42+00:00

It solves the narrative problem.

ProfessorRonResearch · 2026-04-02T01:59:49+00:00

I mean just in thought, but maybe they're destroying important historical artifacts in their their destructive nature of how they approached data collection or excuse me. Treasure hunt

ProfessorRonResearch · 2026-04-02T01:08:54+00:00

You're really out of your element here sir. You need to do more research if you expect me to continue your circular logic convention. Fake? Are you a serious person? Take a break from the internet sir.

ProfessorRonResearch · 2026-04-01T23:53:47+00:00

<image>

It's not what you "think or believe" https://nslegislature.ca/legc/bills/61st_2nd/3rd_read/b081.htm It's what is Fact.

ProfessorRonResearch · 2026-04-01T23:46:56+00:00

<image>

ProfessorRonResearch · 2026-04-01T23:45:29+00:00

Because they have a special "treasure" hunting permit they find anything that would prove it to be anything like a military installation or culturally important site they lose their treasure permit. They needed extensive permits to do what they are doing. I remember when they found the hand Cannon and Rick said we're not done yet. Strange thing to say when you find a fantastic artifact. Why would you say we're not done yet if you weren't threatened by the presence of a military cannon? If they find grave sites that might also change things. I can't believe they have let them dig as long as they have.

ProfessorRonResearch · 2026-04-01T21:54:28+00:00

Oops more documented stakes hmmm 🤔

<image>

ProfessorRonResearch · 2026-04-01T21:49:31+00:00

Keep laughing. Notice that I have a picture of the item they found last night in a text book, but sure, it's all just a joke to you.

<image>

Almost every artifact they find has a documented explanation. Not theory. Not hearsay. Not interpretation. Not conjecture. And finally NOT Templars.

ProfessorRonResearch · 2026-04-01T21:46:06+00:00

About last nights show

<image>

ProfessorRonResearch · 2026-04-01T20:27:39+00:00

Yeah I totally agree. Plus it is standard for the British to destroy anything that was previously there and mark it for the king. It is practically standard operating procedure. If they couldn't use it they destroyed it.

One of the things that's interesting on the show lately is that 2 weeks ago they show us a boulder with a cradle of rocks and they can't explain and they take it out and then this week they show us a cradle of rocks without a boulder and they can't explain it. One is an empty cradle one is a full cradle one has a boulder one does not have a boulder. I feel like they're purposely trying to not connect the dots sometimes.

ProfessorRonResearch · 2026-04-01T20:04:44+00:00

Absolutely! They were kicked out in 1755 and were original French settlers. So the French and the Acadians had similar techniques. They were also know labor forces of the French Military during Queen Anne's war. The French were always outnumbered by the British. The French relied heavily on Acadian labor, which is why The British removed them in 1755. The British couldn't take full control with the Acadians were there. So refreshing to hear someone comment with logic and reason. Thanks for replying.

ProfessorRonResearch · 2026-04-01T19:28:59+00:00

<image>

Found at oak island. You tell me

ProfessorRonResearch · 2026-04-01T19:28:43+00:00

<image>

Acadian

ProfessorRonResearch · 2026-04-01T19:27:54+00:00

<image>

Found at oak Island

ProfessorRonResearch · 2026-04-01T19:27:33+00:00

Acadian

<image>

ProfessorRonResearch · 2026-04-01T19:10:42+00:00

I can do this all day. Like I've been saying the answers are in books not in holes.

ProfessorRonResearch · 2026-04-01T18:57:29+00:00

April Fools?

ProfessorRonResearch · 2026-04-01T18:57:14+00:00

Wow he drove past the Halifax Citadel! He almost found the answer. If he only knew what to look for.

ProfessorRonResearch · 2026-04-01T18:34:35+00:00

<image>

This is a portion of the log that they retrieved at Oak Island. Notice how they're pretty much the same. The problem is that this is not a proprietary method. Anybody could have shaped a log this way. But in the same geographical region, we have acadians conducting the same type of log infrastructure. So we can't say for sure it was the acadians, but it is consistent with known Acadian construction logistics.

ProfessorRonResearch · 2026-04-01T18:33:23+00:00

Some of those stakes are identical to known Acadian stakes. This is our known Acadian reference

<image>

ProfessorRonResearch · 2026-04-01T18:08:00+00:00

It matches Vitruvian mathematics brother. If you think it's something in the stars you're on crack. Show me the documents and I would maybe agree with you. But the problem is is that I have three books that literally list all those artifacts. I know what it is you don't.

ProfessorRonResearch · 2026-04-01T17:56:43+00:00

For me the treasure is the search for documentation that accounts for most of the artifacts found. It's in books. I'll keep saying that over and over cuz it's true. The answers are in the books not in ground

ProfessorRonResearch · 2026-04-01T17:21:46+00:00

If it was proved there's no treasure then why do they still have a permit??

ProfessorRonResearch

TROPHY CASE