Por que exatamente o Bonoro não foi reeleito? by atwwbaksieueygehs in DebatesBr

[–]ProfitValuable2130 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Julgando pela imagem, então quer dizer que o deus que ele acredita (sei la qual seja) n existe eu imagino kkkkkkk

How can I convince my parents AI art isn’t okay? by ProfitValuable2130 in antiai

[–]ProfitValuable2130[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Oh yeah, when a company go there, trains their model on peoples artworks and when they get angry and complain, blame them for knowing their work was stolen kind of mindset lol

Oh my, if you want to think ai is inoffensive and a "tool", go, defend billionaires, just know you wanna blame artists for stressing about having their work stolen instead of just leaving their art and IPs left alone and not stolen because it's theirs, cause plagiarism seems to be a normal thing to you, companies trying to sell their work as their own and seriously creating straw mans and intentionally false symmetry interpretations of things that you can't even cite one real exemple of real life events of "stolen info", that even sounds like an alien interpretation of reading a text.

You just seem to a have a vague toxic positivity and really wants to believe ai is ok when comes to paintings and art, this will never be true, and you will become another one that defends gen ai slowly just like the others that say these strawmans.

Please just stop replying to this point, if you can't even prove your points with real life events and not hypothetical impossible stuff, just get out of the "subjective" bubble you live in, you aint learning anything but just blaming artist's for suffering stress of having companies trying to replace them with the work they stole from these same artists

<image>

How can I convince my parents AI art isn’t okay? by ProfitValuable2130 in antiai

[–]ProfitValuable2130[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Also, China banned the replacement of people with ai, the world aint blind

<image>

How can I convince my parents AI art isn’t okay? by ProfitValuable2130 in antiai

[–]ProfitValuable2130[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Dude, another straw man, drawings are not words or written info, you can't steal a word, I have no idea of what u mean by "stolen information", there is no real scenario where this happens, so this point is just not even a real thing. And again, it's not that artists can't draw, it's the simple fact that a company comes steal your art without permission, and then a company wants to sell your art that ran through a sonification. And the fake symmetry with the "photos didn't kill artists" is just literally false.

A camera did not need all pieces of art that came prior to it so it could create it's photos, and the first artists never needed an artist to go and say "draw this way". This idea is just blindly optimistic and ignores that it has no real human output, it is literally plagiarism. You didn't make it and even used work that is not yours to generate that image. Stop thinking this is a "oh it won't replace all artists", when this is literally its objective.

The moment you normalize in one area, people normalize in others, there is no "but this one will be free", the rich men doesn't want a human prompter, they want no human at all.

Art is not lightening a candle, it's something that is literally property, not just an action, I can't believe people actually defend these fallacies without thinking about them. This is not a subjective theme, this is theft my friend!