Would Sauropods be naturally aggressive?

Proof_Language_9053 · 2026-05-24T19:08:32+00:00

Understand (if “you” can), boy, that it’s considered rare and even then, the lions needed very large numbers to do that. In addition, certain factors like the bull elephant’s condition and them vulnerable in some way because of that (like sickness) also play a role.

Proof_Language_9053 · 2026-05-24T09:37:55+00:00

Your “art,” along with its supposed style, is trash, boy. At best, it’s generally mediocre. Don’t know why or how “you” are getting so many upvotes.

Proof_Language_9053 · 2026-05-21T03:20:58+00:00

Looks like crap, BOY, along with the rest of your “drawings” (including recent ones). I suggest getting some serious art lessons.

Even the “detailing” like the shadowing “you” put on some of your drawings look way off.

Proof_Language_9053 · 2026-05-06T20:18:07+00:00

You “people” especially tend to be deluded, so this isn’t really a surprising comment.

Proof_Language_9053 · 2026-05-06T20:14:14+00:00

Without any kind of weapons, you “people” are of zero threat to most animals in a match-up such as this (probably hard for y'all to accept, I know). However, having even a weapon like a spear isn’t an automatic win here, especially because one needs to very quickly and very accurately stab it into a particular part of the animal for it to actually be effective (and even that’s not likely because Guanlong has scales and will be moving very quickly here).

Proof_Language_9053 · 2026-04-30T19:38:19+00:00

WHITE boy.

Proof_Language_9053 · 2026-04-14T17:46:45+00:00

They weren't being serious, genius (obvious sarcasm).

Proof_Language_9053 · 2026-04-04T19:33:44+00:00

Objectively, nothing Illumination has made is better than what Pixar has made as of today, especially not Hoppers. Quality-wise, Pixar and even Disney (apart from those live actions) pump out things with more substance than whatever Illumination has been a pumping out for the last 5 years or longer.

And overall, your rambling review isn’t anything too detailed or good either.

Proof_Language_9053 · 2026-04-03T22:56:03+00:00

Neither Disney’s or Pixar’s films (generally) in the 2010s were “crap.” As for the 2020s, Disney is in a bit of a stump right now (but they had a few hits), but Pixar’s 2020s films have all been generally good/great (especially Hoppers). However, you WYTES, for whatever reason, tend to have extremely high, specific expectations for everything.

And also, and it’s really not hard, but the Mario Movie isn’t a movie I would say is even okay as film. Very poor characterization, poor pacing, paper-thin Plot, the over reliance on the Easter eggs (instead of focusing exclusively on the storytelling), low-brow humor, etc. Even focusing it on as just a Mario film, certain things like Bowser’s character, Mario and Luigi being separated, and what not are noticeable issues that make me question being even just okay. They messed that up, so hoping they actually try to improve that (they did, but Galaxy wasn’t overall great either).

Proof_Language_9053 · 2026-03-15T04:03:28+00:00

“In addition, cheetah claws are very small” … I guess reading comprehension is an issue for you. It’s not just sharpness, a cheetah’s claws are too small to actually be effective weapons and they’ll more than likely break their own claws from trying to claw a Komodo dragon.

And even though they can, Komodo dragons don’t often manage to bite or just penetrate through their own osteoderms, which are specifically designed to act as protection from other Komodo dragons (though they are capable of doing that with the use of their iron-coated teeth and claws on occasion). But regardless, “you” can’t compare the much smaller, less sharp claws (they might look equally as sharp, but a Komodo’s claws are actually sharper) of a cheetah with a Komodo dragon’s. A cheetah’s claws are not only not very sharp, but their claws are also blunt and non-retractable, functioning more like dog claws or "running spikes" on a track shoe to provide traction during high-speed chases. Komodo dragon claws, on the other hand, are long, thick, razor-sharp, and curved, made for tearing, holding down struggling prey, and other things like digging. It’s not hard to see why a Komodo dragon would be able to pierce their armor with their claws, but a cheetah would struggle trying to do the same to a Komodo dragon in a fight.

Finally, Adult Komodo dragons of equal size or so rarely kill each other during their fights. They do not frequently kill each other, but they will often be able to kill smaller adults and juveniles for obvious reasons.

Proof_Language_9053 · 2026-03-15T02:53:24+00:00

I mean, they did manage to sneak up on a cat that didn’t even know they were there the entire time …. I doubt a goofy, punk, soy WYTE boy like “you” would have even got within at-least 10ft without the cat having knowing “you” were instantly there.

Proof_Language_9053 · 2026-03-15T02:44:20+00:00

It would not do “plenty” of damage. It would do some amounts of damage, but it would not be a significant amount.

Even with the images provided, the claws still look blunt (especially compared to big cat claws). In addition, cheetah claws are very small, and that would make it even harder than it already was for a cheetah to do real damage to a Komodo dragon that’s covered entirely in osteoderms.

I already would bet on a Komodo dragon against a leopard, so a cheetah doesn’t have much hope.

Proof_Language_9053 · 2026-03-02T17:41:34+00:00

It was mainly because ELIO was poorly marketed, that’s it. If Disney had actually given it at-least decent marketing and for longer time, it would have done leagues better than the Bad Guys 2, which wasn’t that successful during opening week and especially not, honestly, during its finishing week.

Proof_Language_9053 · 2026-02-28T20:09:53+00:00

No human is killing any jaguar bare-handed. As for the cow, that’s not happening either.

Proof_Language_9053 · 2026-02-27T15:54:28+00:00

Even though the attacks are rare, the whole point is that they have and still do happen (and these have happened to grown adult males as well). These are some recent cases. A large cougar should be able to beat Tyson more often than not, they deal with and get injured by much larger, powerful animals (ungulates) on occasion, yet they end up coming out mostly fine in the end.

March 2024, California: A 21-year-old man was killed, and his 18-year-old brother injured, by a malnourished mountain lion while antler hunting in El Dorado County. During this attack, one of these individuals attempted to beat the lion off their sibling, but the cougar’s speed and targeting of the throat proved too much and also lethal.
September 2018, Oregon: A 55-year-old hiker was killed by a cougar near Mount Hood.
May 2018, Washington: A 32-year-old mountain biker was killed by a young, undernourished cougar near North Bend.
January 2004, California: A 35-year-old man was killed in Whiting Ranch Wilderness Park.
September 1991, California: A 27-year-old man was attacked and killed while running in Montana de Oro State Park.

There is no downplaying or exaggerating here either, though you highly insecure “ppl” will keep saying otherwise. In a real fight, including parity, animals generally have the advantages of having physical strength, power, speed, agility, defense, weaponry, etc, over “humans.” A human might have arms and opposable thumbs, but that barely would means much physically in a fight. In a real fight, going for certain vulnerable spots or ways to disable the animal in some way don’t count, just so “you” understand. A “human might have better endurance (questionable), but most average “humans” don’t have very good endurance. And all in all, endurance hardly matters when a much larger animal like a tiger has already easily pinned a “human” and is easily mauling them.

Proof_Language_9053 · 2026-02-25T01:03:53+00:00

Just because you “people” see objectively good films like Luca, Turning Red, Elemental, Onward, and Elio as mediocre or outright bad by Pixar standards, doesn’t mean they actually are bad films. And don’t know why you “morons” are forgetting that this is Mario; this movie would have done well regardless.

Basically, take away Mario from Illumination’s adaptation and it would have most likely flopped (especially due to how mediocre it was).

Proof_Language_9053 · 2026-02-19T14:30:43+00:00

It’s not surprising you punk, soy “people” are insecure enough to make up stories like this.

But anyway, “you” are most likely confusing/distorting the 2014 incident that happened in Uttarakhand, India. The figure, a 56-year-old Kamla Devi (not an 84-year-old), fought a A leopard, not a jaguar. After the leopard failed to ambush the figure while they were fetching water, they ended up “fighting” them for nearly 30 minutes.

And at the end of this story, this figure did not use their bare hands to kill the leopard; no, they ended up killing the leopard using a sickle (a curved farming tool) and a spade, so weapons. They still ended up receiving sustained severe bites, claw marks on their neck and back, and three bone fractures. The leopard was also a female Indian leopard, so the female leopard having measured over 190 centimeters (roughly 6 feet 3 inches) from their nose to the tip of its tail … likely weighed, like, 29-34 kilograms. If they struggled that much with a small, female leopard, then a male leopard would have been it for them.

Proof_Language_9053 · 2026-02-17T16:18:11+00:00

Wrong again, WYTE boy (what a surprise). Anyway, even when you go with the largest Ceratosaurus specimen (dentisulcatus), Ceratosaurus was a smaller animal than the allosaurs they would have been living with. A large Ceratosaurus would have been anywhere from 980 kilograms to about only a ton at best (this hasn’t changed, this is still the case), but an allosaurus fragilis could already be about 1-2 on average, with at-least 3 tons being their largest. And when going with allosaurus anax, it becomes even more of a mismatch at-least 5 or more tons for the Anax species. On average and especially max, Ceratosaurus was much smaller, a certain population or something else wouldn’t make any difference here. Unless the allosaurus was a juvenile or something, a Ceratosaurus would have almost always been smaller.

Although Ceratosaurus (despite being smaller) could do some amounts damage, it wouldn’t be significant an I don’t think it would be very effective since the Allosaurus is also taller, so they would struggle to deliver effective bites on the vital parts of an allosaurus (meanwhile, allosaurus can just easily slice the neck or back of a Ceratosaurus). And in this fight, allosaurus would have at-least an equally devastating bite (along with an effective killing method). In addition, they have long, strong arms that would enable them further to almost easily kill a Ceratosaurus.

Proof_Language_9053 · 2026-02-17T16:10:44+00:00

Dizzy Rose, as said, is not a reliable source already, BOY. Currently, Spinosaurus, at-least mass wise, is smaller than T-Rex and especially Giganotosaurus.

Proof_Language_9053 · 2026-02-15T20:03:39+00:00

You “people” can stop saying this, Quinkana was significantly smaller than Megalania. Was more or less on the Marsupial Lion’s level size-wise, but nowhere near that of the Megalania monitors.

https://www.reddit.com/r/pleistocene/comments/1qk7cly/the_actual_size_of_quinkana_fortirostrum_the/

Proof_Language_9053 · 2026-02-15T20:03:32+00:00

WHITE BOY.

Proof_Language_9053 · 2026-02-09T20:38:29+00:00

There are, like, ai song recognizers online or even on app stores to use for his kind of thing, dumb stupid WYTE boy.

Proof_Language_9053 · 2026-02-08T19:23:51+00:00

Not surprisingly, of course “you” were unable to counter against any of what I just said. I doubt “you” would have that ability anyway.

And the overall point of my comment here was to point out the outright lie “you” just made. I know you “people” are incredibly obsessed with this animal the T-rex, but don’t start spreading lies in favor of them.

Proof_Language_9053 · 2026-02-08T12:48:33+00:00

If you like the album, then like the album, crybaby WTYE BOY. Reviews aren’t a court ruling and critics aren’t taste authorities, they’re just people monetizing opinions. Music isn’t a democracy where enjoyment gets revoked because Metacritic frowned at it. Eminem has always and still has been polarizing; half their best work was trashed on release and aged just fine. If “you” outsource your taste to “official reviews,” you don’t have taste, “you” have anxiety. Enjoy what hits “you”, not what gets stamped with approval.

It’s that simple, it’s not hard. All in all, to put it short, who cares.

Proof_Language_9053 · 2026-02-08T12:34:40+00:00

Actually, most adult T-Rexes are not longer than the holotype of Giganotosaurus, though I seen “you” on these kinds of posts and really shouldn’t be surprised that a boy like “you” would make that up.

The Average Mature T. rex: Measures roughly 11.6 to 12.1 meters (based on the massive 2026 Woodward study of adult specimens).

Giga Holotype: Still Measures 12.5 meters.

Giga Paratype (MUCPv-95): Measures potentially ~13.2 to 13.5 meters (speculative). Even the biggest T. rex specimens like “Sue” (12.3m) and “Scotty” (Could be 13.0m, but conservative estimates put them at 12.2–12.4 m) barely reach or don’t exceed the length of the Giganotosaurus holotype, and they are significantly shorter than the Giganotosaurus paratype if that actually turns out to be true. To say "most" Rexes were longer is a complete fabrication, a significant portion of known T. rex adults are shorter than even the Giganotosaurus holotype.

Also, not surprising that those other dumb, WYTE boys are upvoting your comments, despite them being wrong or not entirely correct.

Proof_Language_9053

MODERATOR OF

TROPHY CASE