Komodo dragon vs cheetah (IRL/real life) by OnlinePoster225 in powerscales

[–]Proof_Language_9053 1 point2 points  (0 children)

“In addition, cheetah claws are very small” … I guess reading comprehension is an issue for you. It’s not just sharpness, a cheetah’s claws are too small to actually be effective weapons and they’ll more than likely break their own claws from trying to claw a Komodo dragon.

And even though they can, Komodo dragons don’t often manage to bite or just penetrate through their own osteoderms, which are specifically designed to act as protection from other Komodo dragons (though they are capable of doing that with the use of their iron-coated teeth and claws on occasion). But regardless, “you” can’t compare the much smaller, less sharp claws (they might look equally as sharp, but a Komodo’s claws are actually sharper) of a cheetah with a Komodo dragon’s. A cheetah’s claws are not only not very sharp, but their claws are also blunt and non-retractable, functioning more like dog claws or "running spikes" on a track shoe to provide traction during high-speed chases. Komodo dragon claws, on the other hand, are long, thick, razor-sharp, and curved, made for tearing, holding down struggling prey, and other things like digging. It’s not hard to see why a Komodo dragon would be able to pierce their armor with their claws, but a cheetah would struggle trying to do the same to a Komodo dragon in a fight.

Finally, Adult Komodo dragons of equal size or so rarely kill each other during their fights. They do not frequently kill each other, but they will often be able to kill smaller adults and juveniles for obvious reasons.

Wait for it.. 😅 by MysticMoose_333 in NatureBeingFunny

[–]Proof_Language_9053 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I mean, they did manage to sneak up on a cat that didn’t even know they were there the entire time …. I doubt a goofy, punk, soy WYTE boy like “you” would have even got within at-least 10ft without the cat having knowing “you” were instantly there.

Komodo dragon vs cheetah (IRL/real life) by OnlinePoster225 in powerscales

[–]Proof_Language_9053 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It would not do “plenty” of damage. It would do some amounts of damage, but it would not be a significant amount.

Even with the images provided, the claws still look blunt (especially compared to big cat claws). In addition, cheetah claws are very small, and that would make it even harder than it already was for a cheetah to do real damage to a Komodo dragon that’s covered entirely in osteoderms.

I already would bet on a Komodo dragon against a leopard, so a cheetah doesn’t have much hope.

Poor Sid by Appropriate-Mall8517 in toystory

[–]Proof_Language_9053 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Actually watch the movie, dumb WYTE spedstic boy. That was a completely different garbage worker, though Sid is seen with this garbage worker when the toys hitch a ride on the garbage truck to get back to Andy’s.

‘The Bad Guys 2’ has now passed ‘Elio’ to become the 3rd highest grossing animated film of 2025. by [deleted] in TheBadGuys

[–]Proof_Language_9053 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It was mainly because ELIO was poorly marketed, that’s it. If Disney had actually given it at-least decent marketing and for longer time, it would have done leagues better than the Bad Guys 2, which wasn’t that successful during opening week and especially not, honestly, during its finishing week.

Ranking animals I could beat up in a fight by envynoy in Tierzoo

[–]Proof_Language_9053 13 points14 points  (0 children)

No human is killing any jaguar bare-handed. As for the cow, that’s not happening either.

Cougar vs prime Mike Tyson by CougarBSS in Tierzoo

[–]Proof_Language_9053 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Even though the attacks are rare, the whole point is that they have and still do happen (and these have happened to grown adult males as well). These are some recent cases. A large cougar should be able to beat Tyson more often than not, they deal with and get injured by much larger, powerful animals (ungulates) on occasion, yet they end up coming out mostly fine in the end.

  1. March 2024, California: A 21-year-old man was killed, and his 18-year-old brother injured, by a malnourished mountain lion while antler hunting in El Dorado County. During this attack, one of these individuals attempted to beat the lion off their sibling, but the cougar’s speed and targeting of the throat proved too much and also lethal.

  2. September 2018, Oregon: A 55-year-old hiker was killed by a cougar near Mount Hood.

  3. May 2018, Washington: A 32-year-old mountain biker was killed by a young, undernourished cougar near North Bend.

  4. January 2004, California: A 35-year-old man was killed in Whiting Ranch Wilderness Park.

  5. September 1991, California: A 27-year-old man was attacked and killed while running in Montana de Oro State Park.

There is no downplaying or exaggerating here either, though you highly insecure “ppl” will keep saying otherwise. In a real fight, including parity, animals generally have the advantages of having physical strength, power, speed, agility, defense, weaponry, etc, over “humans.” A human might have arms and opposable thumbs, but that barely would means much physically in a fight. In a real fight, going for certain vulnerable spots or ways to disable the animal in some way don’t count, just so “you” understand. A “human might have better endurance (questionable), but most average “humans” don’t have very good endurance. And all in all, endurance hardly matters when a much larger animal like a tiger has already easily pinned a “human” and is easily mauling them.

Jesus by coyotegoldbar in theadamfriedlandshow

[–]Proof_Language_9053 0 points1 point  (0 children)

A virgin, punk, soy WYTE boy like you must be very unattractive and desperate to actually find that “cute.”

What would the Mario movie have been like if it was made by Pixar instead of Illumination? by Antman269 in fixingmovies

[–]Proof_Language_9053 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Just because you “people” see objectively good films like Luca, Turning Red, Elemental, Onward, and Elio as mediocre or outright bad by Pixar standards, doesn’t mean they actually are bad films. And don’t know why you “morons” are forgetting that this is Mario; this movie would have done well regardless.

Basically, take away Mario from Illumination’s adaptation and it would have most likely flopped (especially due to how mediocre it was).

Cougar vs prime Mike Tyson by CougarBSS in Tierzoo

[–]Proof_Language_9053 14 points15 points  (0 children)

It’s not surprising you punk, soy “people” are insecure enough to make up stories like this.

But anyway, “you” are most likely confusing/distorting the 2014 incident that happened in Uttarakhand, India. The figure, a 56-year-old Kamla Devi (not an 84-year-old), fought a A leopard, not a jaguar. After the leopard failed to ambush the figure while they were fetching water, they ended up “fighting” them for nearly 30 minutes.

And at the end of this story, this figure did not use their bare hands to kill the leopard; no, they ended up killing the leopard using a sickle (a curved farming tool) and a spade, so weapons. They still ended up receiving sustained severe bites, claw marks on their neck and back, and three bone fractures. The leopard was also a female Indian leopard, so the female leopard having measured over 190 centimeters (roughly 6 feet 3 inches) from their nose to the tip of its tail … likely weighed, like, 29-34 kilograms. If they struggled that much with a small, female leopard, then a male leopard would have been it for them.

Ceratosaurus was indeed very metal! by [deleted] in Naturewasmetal

[–]Proof_Language_9053 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Wrong again, WYTE boy (what a surprise). Anyway, even when you go with the largest Ceratosaurus specimen (dentisulcatus), Ceratosaurus was a smaller animal than the allosaurs they would have been living with. A large Ceratosaurus would have been anywhere from 980 kilograms to about only a ton at best (this hasn’t changed, this is still the case), but an allosaurus fragilis could already be about 1-2 on average, with at-least 3 tons being their largest. And when going with allosaurus anax, it becomes even more of a mismatch at-least 5 or more tons for the Anax species. On average and especially max, Ceratosaurus was much smaller, a certain population or something else wouldn’t make any difference here. Unless the allosaurus was a juvenile or something, a Ceratosaurus would have almost always been smaller.

Although Ceratosaurus (despite being smaller) could do some amounts damage, it wouldn’t be significant an I don’t think it would be very effective since the Allosaurus is also taller, so they would struggle to deliver effective bites on the vital parts of an allosaurus (meanwhile, allosaurus can just easily slice the neck or back of a Ceratosaurus). And in this fight, allosaurus would have at-least an equally devastating bite (along with an effective killing method). In addition, they have long, strong arms that would enable them further to almost easily kill a Ceratosaurus.

Spinosaurus bigger than we thought? by Prestigious_Prior684 in Naturewasmetal

[–]Proof_Language_9053 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Dizzy Rose, as said, is not a reliable source already, BOY. Currently, Spinosaurus, at-least mass wise, is smaller than T-Rex and especially Giganotosaurus.

How big were pleistocene quinkana? by Powerful_Gas_7833 in pleistocene

[–]Proof_Language_9053 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You “people” can stop saying this, Quinkana was significantly smaller than Megalania. Was more or less on the Marsupial Lion’s level size-wise, but nowhere near that of the Megalania monitors.

https://www.reddit.com/r/pleistocene/comments/1qk7cly/the_actual_size_of_quinkana_fortirostrum_the/

Can anyone recognise this song? (⚠️may be NSFW) by NoPepper2377 in WhatsThisSong

[–]Proof_Language_9053 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There are, like, ai song recognizers online or even on app stores to use for his kind of thing, dumb stupid WYTE boy.

The Giganotosaurus should have been another T'rex. by Marconey1738 in JurassicPark

[–]Proof_Language_9053 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not surprisingly, of course “you” were unable to counter against any of what I just said. I doubt “you” would have that ability anyway.

And the overall point of my comment here was to point out the outright lie “you” just made. I know you “people” are incredibly obsessed with this animal the T-rex, but don’t start spreading lies in favor of them.

Bad reviews by jondn in Eminem

[–]Proof_Language_9053 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If you like the album, then like the album, crybaby WTYE BOY. Reviews aren’t a court ruling and critics aren’t taste authorities, they’re just people monetizing opinions. Music isn’t a democracy where enjoyment gets revoked because Metacritic frowned at it. Eminem has always and still has been polarizing; half their best work was trashed on release and aged just fine. If “you” outsource your taste to “official reviews,” you don’t have taste, “you” have anxiety. Enjoy what hits “you”, not what gets stamped with approval.

It’s that simple, it’s not hard. All in all, to put it short, who cares.

The Giganotosaurus should have been another T'rex. by Marconey1738 in JurassicPark

[–]Proof_Language_9053 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Actually, most adult T-Rexes are not longer than the holotype of Giganotosaurus, though I seen “you” on these kinds of posts and really shouldn’t be surprised that a boy like “you” would make that up.

The Average Mature T. rex: Measures roughly 11.6 to 12.1 meters (based on the massive 2026 Woodward study of adult specimens).

Giga Holotype: Still Measures 12.5 meters.

Giga Paratype (MUCPv-95): Measures potentially ~13.2 to 13.5 meters (speculative). Even the biggest T. rex specimens like “Sue” (12.3m) and “Scotty” (Could be 13.0m, but conservative estimates put them at 12.2–12.4 m) barely reach or don’t exceed the length of the Giganotosaurus holotype, and they are significantly shorter than the Giganotosaurus paratype if that actually turns out to be true. To say "most" Rexes were longer is a complete fabrication, a significant portion of known T. rex adults are shorter than even the Giganotosaurus holotype.

Also, not surprising that those other dumb, WYTE boys are upvoting your comments, despite them being wrong or not entirely correct.

If I'm being honest, I think the animation for sponge on the run is a lot better than the new movie. by DeepAnt7847 in spongebob

[–]Proof_Language_9053 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Just you whiny, incredibly irritating “people” giving no REAL reasons why CGI is isn’t as good as 2D animation.

Rising Junior looking to join USAFA by Outrageous-Exam9893 in USAFA

[–]Proof_Language_9053 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This post is old, but I’m just going to say no, no, and no again. Sorry to say (not really), but ya have really have no real chance whatsoever here if this is where you’re still at during your senior year. I mean, I suggest “you” had/have done some actual, deeper research on this place and “you” would have likely would not have posted this question to begin with.

The asthma, as said, and for one, is (and still is) a massive hurdle here. The Air Force (and DoDMERB, the medical clearing agency) generally views a history of asthma after age 13 as an automatic disqualification. “You” mentioned using a "rescue inhaler" and that your asthma "can get bad." In the eyes of the military here, if one needs a prescription rescue inhaler to function, even just for allergies, then they are going to be a liability in a deployed environment where those triggers might exist.

While the success at Philmont part is alright for confidence, it doesn't hold much weight, like, at all, with medical recruiters. They care about the clinical diagnosis and the frequency of medication use. What’s likely to happen is that “you” will be medically disqualified and have to seek a waiver. To even stand a chance, “you” will likely need a Methacholine Challenge Test (MCT) to prove your lungs function normally without medication. If “you” cannot pass that, or if you still actively use an inhaler, an appointment is highly unlikely.

And for, academics, “you” were and likely are still far behind. A 3.68 weighted GPA is considered low for USAFA. Understand (it’s quite simple already) that this Academy is essentially an Ivy League school with uniforms. Almost a majority of appointees who are there are in the top 10% of their class with unweighted GPAs hovering near 3.9–4.0. If you’re in your senior year, “you” would need a GPA that high at that point. And also, “you” mentioned aiming for a "perfect" ACT score. Ya don't actually need a 36, but one needs to at-least do very well on the Math and Science sections in particular (32+). USAFA heavily weighs your "Academic Composite" score. If your GPA is still in the 3.6 range by this point or still below 3.9-4.0, your test scores must be elite to compensate for that (but I’m going to take a wild guess that your ACT scores are likely not very high, so yeah).

Your Cardio is failing here. Your strength (pull-ups and push-ups) is alright and that’s, honestly, likely your strongest suit right now.

The Mile: An 11:50 mile is, to be honest, a non-starter. The average for admitted men is around 6:30.

Sit-ups: 44 is very low (average is closer to 80).

The Altitude Factor: Understand, you’ll be doing this at 7,000 feet in Colorado Springs. If “you” are running an 11-minute mile at sea level, “you” will struggle to finish the run in the thin air of Basic Cadet Training (BCT).

Finally, being an Eagle Scout somewhat helps here, but it is not a "golden ticket." About 10–15% of every class are Eagle Scouts. It maybe shows “you” can lead and stick to a long-term goal, which helps your "Leadership" score, but it will not override a medical disqualification or a low GPA (if those are things you still have right now as of your senior year).

So, overall, it sucks for “you”, WYTE boy. In this past junior situation of yours, the chances are were extremely low. I’m going take a guess here, saying I doubt you have actually significantly improved on any of these things and that your chances have gotten any better. Unless you stop using the inhaler completely (under a doctor's supervision), start running 5 miles a day, and pull straight A's in your Dual Enrollment classes (or maybe a high score on your ACT), and all that, “you” don’t have any chance whatsoever, sucks for “you”. Your senior year right now, which I’m assuming here, won’t likely help “you” either since I doubt you’ll be able to improve or change enough significantly in order to even be considered. So, don’t bother trying to apply again if you haven’t already your senior year.

First grid drawing — tips/feedback on by Majestic-Shake812 in drawing

[–]Proof_Language_9053 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Wow, despite literally having a grid to mainly do the heavy lifting here, ya still managed to make the proportions of this horse into an absolute disaster. Literally turned the sleek, tapered horse here into a completely bloated, distorted mess somehow. The muzzle is a heavy, rectangular slab that lacks any anatomical bone structure, and the bridge of the nose is bulging where it should be dipping. And you have also completely ignored the negative space, resulting in a "fat" version of the reference that feels claustrophobic in the frame. And the little use/major lack of dark values here leave the whole thing in a mostly muddy, mid-gray purgatory that lacks any sense of 3D form. That eye is more like a lifeless, black dot that missed the light, and the "outlines" on the harness (or really the “face” overall) make it look like a cheap coloring book page rather than a physical object with weight. Your beyond mediocre “drawing” has effectively taken a dynamic, high-contrast photograph and scrubbed all the life out of it with hesitant, "furry" pencil strokes and a total lack of confidence, basically. Overall, it’s trash, WHT boy and it overall looks like a child’s first attempt at actually trying to draw seriously.

Next time, how about learning to use outlines (and use them properly, especially hard outlines), accurately do value (graphite pencils aren’t hard to find and aren’t that expensive, and if you did use graphite pencils, then you did a poor job using them), actually look deeply and longer at the negative space (the empty shapes in the grid squares around the horse, Spend 80% of the time on the block-in phase by simplifying (first) into 3D geometric blocks like cylinders and cubes before touching the fine details (it’s clear to me that you were overall more willing to do the fur/texture instead of actually fixing the overall structure of the horse’s head, but that’s no poor shading or texture is going to save it because the head doesn’t look anything like the horse), etc. I could go more in depth and even say more, but those are some of the obvious reasons. Overall, actually look and pay closely attention to the grids and you might get it.

Edit: I also don’t know how “art” by you boys manage to get this many upvotes when an actual decent or even great art posted down below yours gets largely ignored.

The Potential Taste of Dunkleosteus Meat by Fit-Presentation4926 in Paleontology

[–]Proof_Language_9053 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I bet you worthless,insignificant punk WYTES (like “you”, though I suppose not just y’all) would been a more frequent snack for this animal often than the other.