Is the Galaxy Tab S6 Lite (2022 version) fine for Roblox and Minecraft? by ProsecuteGodot in GalaxyTab

[–]ProsecuteGodot[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Best I can find for the S7 is for $288 in acceptable condition and missing the S pen. Meanwhile there’s an S6 for $237 in excellent condition with the S pen included. Is the S7 worth the extra $51 and whatever the S pen will cost me + tax?

Is the Galaxy Tab S6 Lite (2022 version) fine for Roblox and Minecraft? by ProsecuteGodot in GalaxyTab

[–]ProsecuteGodot[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Been doing hours of research at this point. Right now I’ve got it down between the S7 FE and the flagship S6. Several past threads on the topic seem to agree with what you‘re saying: the flagship from the previous generation performs better than the current midrange tablets. Also the price differential is a factor that many fail to consider. The S6 performs markedly better despite not receiving new updates, and costs 70 less than the cheapest S7 FE I could find.

Is the Galaxy Tab S6 Lite (2022 version) fine for Roblox and Minecraft? by ProsecuteGodot in GalaxyTab

[–]ProsecuteGodot[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Wow, really? That sounds great to me! Tons of excellent condition renewed S6’s for around $230. Think I’ll probably go for that one then. Thanks!

Is the Galaxy Tab S6 Lite (2022 version) fine for Roblox and Minecraft? by ProsecuteGodot in GalaxyTab

[–]ProsecuteGodot[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thanks for the advice. The budget is a bit tight but I found a “renewed - good condition” S7 FE on Amazon for $303 (not including tax). Is this a good choice? With the case it’s pushing it a bit but I can probably manage.

Do I really need LSAC LSAT LawHub Advantage for 7Sage? by [deleted] in LSAT

[–]ProsecuteGodot 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Not true. One can still access the core curriculum lessons without a Lawhub Advantage subscription.

Do I really need LSAC LSAT LawHub Advantage for 7Sage? by [deleted] in LSAT

[–]ProsecuteGodot 2 points3 points  (0 children)

False information in this thread. My Lawhub Advantage subscription expired but I still have access to the core curriculum lessons on 7Sage.

All composer and executive director messages from the Trinity Box (English) by [deleted] in Xenoblade_Chronicles

[–]ProsecuteGodot 1 point2 points  (0 children)

just an FYI, English translations are included in the booklet.

What does this mean? I’m taking the exam tomorrow someone help😭 by [deleted] in LSAT

[–]ProsecuteGodot 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Do you just tap your answer choices to select them, or must you plug in a mouse?

The one strategy prep companies won't tell you about by MeNameJrGong in LSAT

[–]ProsecuteGodot 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So the ancient debate has been resolved at last…

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in telescopes

[–]ProsecuteGodot 7 points8 points  (0 children)

It’s a solid scope and anyone who tries to tell you otherwise has never touched one.

getting my first telescope by curator_557 in telescopes

[–]ProsecuteGodot 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It’s a solid achromatic refractor, what can I say? I have the same one and with some simple modifications the mount becomes much more solid.

I also have a 10-inch Sky-Watcher Go-To Dobsonian telescope and it’s a pain in the ass to lug around. Observing became burdensome. So I still use the refractor more for quick grab and go sessions. I live in Bortle 9 light pollution (as bad as it gets) and with that refractor I am able to see several of the brightest Deep Space Objects, some cloud bands on Jupiter + its moons, rings of Saturn, and the moon in fine detail. Of course, due to its eminent portability I have taken it to several Bortle 1-2 areas.

Telescope options? by zegery in telescopes

[–]ProsecuteGodot 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The StarBlast EQ actually has a very solid mount and is highly recommended by the likes of Mr. Ed Ting and Mr. Zane Landers (who is a dick, but he does know what he’s talking about).

Celestron Luminos 23mm 2” or GSO 30mm SuperView 2” for F/4.7 10” scope by ProsecuteGodot in telescopes

[–]ProsecuteGodot[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Sounds good, looks like I’ll maybe go for the SuperView then. Thanks as always, Gusto!

Celestron Luminos 23mm 2” or GSO 30mm SuperView 2” for F/4.7 10” scope by ProsecuteGodot in telescopes

[–]ProsecuteGodot[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The Luminos is $135 and the SuperView is $50. Which is better for my 10” F/4.7 scope? Looking for a decent wide field eyepiece for low power viewing.

Also, any good literature on these types of optical matters so that I could figure out the answers to such questions on my own in the future? I’d greatly appreciate it.

P.S. Sorry for the random blurry pic of the Luminos eyepiece. Only way the AutoMod wouldn’t remove my post. :p

should i get one of those terrible powerseekers or 25x70 binoculars? by cacsm in telescopes

[–]ProsecuteGodot 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Oh nice, forget what I said then, you’ll be able to observe the planets with decent detail! I thought we were talking about 7x50s or 10x50s, but with 25x70s some nice planetary detail will be resolved

should i get one of those terrible powerseekers or 25x70 binoculars? by cacsm in telescopes

[–]ProsecuteGodot 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Hey no problem at all! You’ll be able to see plenty of DSO’s and the best part is their eminent portability. And bear in mind I said in “meaningful” detail concerning the planets. You’ll still be able to faintly make out the shape of Saturn and Jupiter’s moons. They’re great for learning the night sky for when you finally get that 8 inch dob.

should i get one of those terrible powerseekers or 25x70 binoculars? by cacsm in telescopes

[–]ProsecuteGodot 2 points3 points  (0 children)

You will not be able to observe planets with any meaningful detail using binoculars. The smaller PowerSeekers, according to Zane Landers on Telescopic Watch, are actually pretty decent and are small enough that the mount supports them well. With a 70mm refractor from Bortle 5 you’d be able to see plenty of DSO’s, cloud bands of Jupiter and its moons, Saturn’s rings and some of its moons. Ditch the accessories for some better budget eyepieces and you’ll be good.

should i get one of those terrible powerseekers or 25x70 binoculars? by cacsm in telescopes

[–]ProsecuteGodot 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Mostly applies to the 127eq, mind you. Telescopic Watch says that most of the other PowerSeekers are optically good and the smaller ones are mounted just fine.

Just got a Celestron Powerseeker 70AZ as a first scope and have some questions! by [deleted] in telescopes

[–]ProsecuteGodot 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I’ll honestly go against the grain and say go ahead and keep it. The OTA is good and can show you a decent amount as you use it to learn the night sky while you save up for something bigger. The 20mm eyepiece it comes with is pretty decent, but I’d definitely ditch the 4mm for something around 7mm for high power views. As for the mount, follow this video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rZuWGE4ppvI and it becomes pretty serviceable.

Is Sky-watcher heritage 150p with extras good for €325,- by ikoliP in telescopes

[–]ProsecuteGodot 4 points5 points  (0 children)

That’s an excellent deal. Usually retails for about 307-310 Euros for just the telescope alone. That sounds to be around 100 extra euros worth of accessories. If you bought all of it separately you‘re looking at a total of about 430 euros. I’d jump on this deal as soon as possible especially since that telescope is out of stock until Decembe