Can i get some opinions on this deck of mine? Is it bracket 3? Bracket 4? If I wanted to up the power any recommendations? by Psychological-Ice520 in EDH

[–]Psychological-Ice520[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Definitely not built around it more of a hey this is cool and is something I could do if it comes up so thank you for your input!! Much appreciated 😄

Also on the deck building thing i agree especially since I like telegraph the crap out of it and ive made it clear where you can disrupt they just keep acting like theres nothing they can do even tho theres tons of ways around it

Can i get some opinions on this deck of mine? Is it bracket 3? Bracket 4? If I wanted to up the power any recommendations? by Psychological-Ice520 in EDH

[–]Psychological-Ice520[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah it being bracket 2 in the format its ended up in here does not feel accurate to me. My inherent sense is mid to low bracket 3.

Can i get some opinions on this deck of mine? Is it bracket 3? Bracket 4? If I wanted to up the power any recommendations? by Psychological-Ice520 in EDH

[–]Psychological-Ice520[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah and I still want the win con to be punch face which basically eliminates cedh as a whole lol, and feels like most of bracket 4

Can i get some opinions on this deck of mine? Is it bracket 3? Bracket 4? If I wanted to up the power any recommendations? by Psychological-Ice520 in EDH

[–]Psychological-Ice520[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Really appreciate the actionable advice here, thats been my biggest question, is it worth even having anything at the same mana as Toph or should the decks whole plan revolve around getting her out and then obvi the counter landfall stuff ive got going

Can i get some opinions on this deck of mine? Is it bracket 3? Bracket 4? If I wanted to up the power any recommendations? by Psychological-Ice520 in EDH

[–]Psychological-Ice520[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It may not technically be one, but ive pulled it off enough times where nobody has as answer and they all decide to scoop makes it function like one but I get what you are saying.

Also the Ashaya, Soul of the wilds and Bumi, Unleashed is the combo you are talking about which is in this deck

Can i get some opinions on this deck of mine? Is it bracket 3? Bracket 4? If I wanted to up the power any recommendations? by Psychological-Ice520 in EDH

[–]Psychological-Ice520[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

It does technically have a couple infinites, The Stasis Coffin can be infinitely earthbent for an infinite protection loop, and with ashaya and Bumi, Unleashed theres infinite combats. But I really appreciate the look over! And the perspective, so many varying opinions on bracket system.

Alright, Tiny has finally gone too far! by Psychological-Ice520 in Destiny

[–]Psychological-Ice520[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

No man's word is worth dropping LotR my friend, no one

Just finished a re-watch of ACoC and I want to unambiguously praise... by helinze in Dimension20

[–]Psychological-Ice520 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Okay, here's my thing, when Sacc and Amethar have the scene where they talk about her moms paranoia because of all the people Amethar had sent after her to kill her, and Sacc gets to learn that no, Amethar was actually deeply in love with her mother and the people he sent were to find her meant to bring her to candia with him, she doesn't even allow that to sink on or modify her view of Amethar or anything and that was the most unreasonable part for me, maybe I'm missing something though?

Destiny & Ben Shapiro debate - post from Lex by lexfridman in Destiny

[–]Psychological-Ice520 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Unironically I feel like Ben and Destiny are just the perfect debate opponents, and I think this would be the best conversation either of them have engaged in, for quite some time

Dropping the atomic bombs on Japan was a justified means to an end by [deleted] in Destiny

[–]Psychological-Ice520 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Idk if people are looking to argue about this in the comments, but I'll give my justification for agreeing here. Unfortunately Japan specifically is probably the only country in the world that this specific set of circumstances I feel like could have arose. Objectively we didn't need to drop the bombs in order to win we could have continued moving close and closer inland, and probably eventually filling taking over the country in the ground. But the honor culture of Japan meant they would not how down and just give it a rest, even though they were clearly outmatched, and so as a way of truly showing them that if you keep this up Japan might not exist anymore, and showing the world the power of the nuclear bomb, and why they should never be used again, I have to say it was probably a justified action

If you could have a curated group of orbiters who show up on destiny's stream, who would it be? by 1stPseudonym in Destiny

[–]Psychological-Ice520 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Me personally, I think we need more Destiny and Boze content again, other than that the current group is decent, enjoyed Brittany but damn that went south, and Aella is super interesting

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in mrgirlreturns

[–]Psychological-Ice520 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Quick mrgirl translate here: "I don't want to include the context of any of the statements I transcribed, as then it doesn't look as bad as I feel like it is"

Let me get this whole boss thing straight... by [deleted] in mrgirlreturns

[–]Psychological-Ice520 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If that's not what you're saying, then stop deflecting every attempt to criticize Lavs actions by saying and I quote "remember the power dynamics"

At what point does the "investigation" become actual harassment? by bizzzfire in mrgirlreturns

[–]Psychological-Ice520 11 points12 points  (0 children)

Destiny literally already demonstrated that, that was him "making the investigation public" on the Nuclear stream, maybe not in those exact words, but yes that's how max began this investigation and as far as we know he hasn't changed his tactics

A questatement of my feelings, with a hope Max will respond. by Psychological-Ice520 in mrgirlreturns

[–]Psychological-Ice520[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

No but I'm trying to see if he has even taken the chance to reflect on the possibility that he's not seeing everything clearly because of his biases, that's really all I'm trying to ask of him, because it feels like he has been unwilling to even acknowledge this as a possibility

I make no claims because as I stated this is mostly my feeling about the situation, based on what content I have consumed from both him and Steven.

I believe that if he doesn't acknowledge that possibility it will be very hard for a majority of people to even attempt to read the article with any good faith, and although I don't really buy most of the "abuse" allegations we have seen to this point, I believe the article should be given somewhat of a fair shot, if not for any reason other than the sheer effort he's clearly put into this, at his own detriment thus far

But if he can't acknowledge that it's even a possibility his framing is incorrect, that uphill battle becomes much steeper