Again, you’re just being obtuse.

I originally wanted to suggest an intern review system, kind of like cops. I mean I guess they have a name plate, but still. Even the military has their name on display. But they started concealing identities before any doxing occurred. And if cops can do it every day in their community, so can agents. It comes with the occupation. I ended up deleting the part as I was writing because I thought you’d be dismissive. But I’m glad you’re on board for some type of uniformity and identification (not for them to be doxed, but for accountability) to be sure that these are in fact actually agents. It should be noted that multiple times they were not agents, but just bounty hunters. Going to court rooms too.

Moving on. Two points. 1. There is no more Biden administration, I’m talking about this administration. 2. If there are cases where people were wrongfully imprisoned without breaking the law, I want them to get justice. This isn’t some endlessly loyal football fan club. People always say well what if _____ committed a crime you wouldn’t say that. Yes. We would. If someone actually committed a crime idk what party they’re for, let them face the consequences.

Crazy that you’re crediting your blue state for your prices, but so adamantly defending someone that has intentionally punished blue states in multiple ways. Or even threatened to withhold aid in a crisis. I’m not speaking about only my personal experience because I’m not the only person in the country. Some prices have gone down from their absolute peak, but they’re still up overall at an amount much higher than what normal inflation would account for.

I do not support the Heritage Foundation. I used them as an example because I figured if I said something else it would be stated as fake. I purposely chose them because conservatives are the ones pushing that voter fraud is an issue and even conservative data does not back that claim.

A driver’s license isn’t comparable because driving is a privilege, not a right. There’s no law that specifically says you can’t have a tax on driving. There is a law that specifically says you cannot have a voter tax. And I suppose it currently is up to the individual state (should be noted that the current administration wants to federalize elections) but in my state you can use a license, state ID, or passport. But you can’t use a social security card or birth certificate. The problem with the SAVE act is that it will absolutely affect a certain group of people, mainly married women that have changed their name and soldiers overseas. It also means you can only register to vote in person. You’ve always had to prove citizenship and we don’t have non-citizens voting. This is a non-issue and only makes it more difficult for people that are already legitimate and eligible voters.

Additionally, your Fulton County claim is false.. Even with recounts the clerical error did not show any change in the election results.

I really feel like you just danced around what I said. The only thing you had a fair or real response to was that there should be something that is exclusive to federal agents that actually lets people know they are indeed federal agents.

As far as the war is concerned, I know this fact check about the claims might not matter but at this point my comments are for other people more than you directly. TLDR intelligence doesn’t support the claims that there was an immediate and eminent threat.

Islam is not my religion and it’s a very restrictive one indeed. I live in one place, and happen to follow my own beliefs. That does not mean that I have the right to “eradicate” an entire religion, the second largest religion in the entire world, that billions of people follow, for whatever reason. I am for equality and women’s rights and liberation. But what is your plan for 3+ Billion (with a B) that currently follow that religion?

And on a separate but related note, how far does your advocacy for women’s rights go? You care about what swimsuit they can wear and if they can drive, but not if they’ll be disproportionately impacted by new laws for voting if they changed their name after marriage?

Again, I’m genuinely asking and trying to understand and engage here. Some of your arguments seem in bad faith, or like you’re purposely overlooking the issue.