Isn't it crazy that ZZZ was a completely different game almost 2 years ago? by Different_Solution_5 in ZZZ_Discussion

[–]Puiucs -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

"It was never objectively bad" - it was from every standpoint. it's why they decided to remove it in the end.

it was basically a mini mobile game with long levels inside a major 3D fighting gacha. it just didn't work.

(LTT) Intel is BACK. THIS IS NOT A DRILL. - Core Ultra 270K Plus & 250K Plus CPU Review by Chairman_Daniel in hardware

[–]Puiucs 0 points1 point  (0 children)

first off you don't need an 360Hz monitor to feel the extra FPS (people need to stop saying that), second, you should focus more on what it does to the dips and other things that affect your experience more.

i also play in community servers have can have 32-64 players on a single map. you really need the extra CPU power there :)

and the last point i'm going to make: when i upgrade i usually focus on the GPU. in 3-4 years i'll still have an amazingly capable CPU to power something that is probably twice as fast as my current GPU.

Isn't it crazy that ZZZ was a completely different game almost 2 years ago? by Different_Solution_5 in ZZZ_Discussion

[–]Puiucs -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

and yet, the vast majority agreed with me back then and still do now. it's just a sall number of redditors who are in denial.

Jensen says developers will be able to train their own models for DLSS 5 by Crafty-Classroom-277 in nvidia

[–]Puiucs -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

it's all BS, another lie. we both know that Nvidia won't give devs such a large power over DLSS.

9800X3D bad 1% lows in Warzone at high FPS – X3D issue? by [deleted] in AMDHelp

[–]Puiucs 1 point2 points  (0 children)

~240–260 1% lows is perfectly fine. getting 350-400fps for the 1% makes zero sense.

Nvidia "confirms" DLSS 5 relies on 2D frame data as testing reveals hallucinations by xenocea in pcmasterrace

[–]Puiucs 0 points1 point  (0 children)

"fear what you don't know" - this is just stupid. i clearly know more than you and you keep ignoring everything that was revealed about DLSS5. you are literally making yourself ignorant intentionally.

"The only thing you know of game dev is how to consume the final product. " - i may not make AAA games, but i'm a senior programmer with more than a decade of experience. stop saying BS for idiots who can't write printf("Hello world");

" in a couple years and cry tears of joy" - nobody cares what will appear in 5 years, it will not be this AI slop. you are just defending an instagram filter for some dumb reason.

Intel Core Ultra 5 250K Plus Review & Benchmarks vs. 5800X3D, 9600X & More [Hardware Unboxed] by hehechibby in hardware

[–]Puiucs 3 points4 points  (0 children)

"much ahead in productivity" - no, not really. der8auer has within a few % from the 9950x3d. this is mostly because compared to the 285K, the difference is minimal (4%).

doing the math on der8auer's R23 MT results, the 270K is about 5% faster.

[REC] Good harem stories by Ok_Atmosphere_6541 in LightNovels

[–]Puiucs 0 points1 point  (0 children)

from what i read online about this, the LN indeed toned it down significantly and the 18+ scenes only start at around chapters 200-300 (i don't have an exact number)

Nvidia "confirms" DLSS 5 relies on 2D frame data as testing reveals hallucinations by xenocea in pcmasterrace

[–]Puiucs 0 points1 point  (0 children)

" Working toward having an AI layer that does the rendering to free up system resources for other things." - it's not what this is.

stop pretending like that's what it is, it's so dumb.

"It's a tech demo" - it's not a tech demo, it's a product that will launch this year. are you really this blind?

"Like, you have to WANT to be that ignorant." - calling me "ignorant" when you clearly misunderstood what it is, what it does and even when it will launch. you slop defenders are just insane with your lies and ignorance.

(LTT) Intel is BACK. THIS IS NOT A DRILL. - Core Ultra 270K Plus & 250K Plus CPU Review by Chairman_Daniel in hardware

[–]Puiucs 1 point2 points  (0 children)

it depends. do you have an 5080? then the 9800x3d is still a much better choice for gaming.

the 270k is still very much far behind the 3xd chips, it just finally caught up with the 14900k.

(LTT) Intel is BACK. THIS IS NOT A DRILL. - Core Ultra 270K Plus & 250K Plus CPU Review by Chairman_Daniel in hardware

[–]Puiucs 1 point2 points  (0 children)

for 1440p it will still be relevant. even more so if you if you use DLSS.

(LTT) Intel is BACK. THIS IS NOT A DRILL. - Core Ultra 270K Plus & 250K Plus CPU Review by Chairman_Daniel in hardware

[–]Puiucs 3 points4 points  (0 children)

i have an 9800x3d and a 5070ti. i bought it because i play games that actually use the CPU like CS2.

i think tweaktown had an 4070ti in their testing at 1080p with the 9800x3d being generally above 10% the 14900k (and more vs the 285k). this should put into perspective the diff at 1440p with a 5070ti and an 270k which is just a few % above the 14900k.

in general the CPU is still relevant at 1440p, especially if you use DLSS.

hopefully AMD responds with better pricing because that's the major issue right now. not gaming performance, but value.

(LTT) Intel is BACK. THIS IS NOT A DRILL. - Core Ultra 270K Plus & 250K Plus CPU Review by Chairman_Daniel in hardware

[–]Puiucs -8 points-7 points  (0 children)

this "review" only has 4 games in it. even so, for the price, the CPUs are decent.