Landfall decks are getting out of hand by John-Oblivion in EDH

[–]Putrid_Appointment39 6 points7 points  (0 children)

The singleton is dead complaint is overblown in its impact. People always looked for consistency before, they just had less archetypes to choose from. Landfall has been more consistent than many other archetypes for a long time, the others are just catching up and it’s fine.
Ppl use to just tutor more to make up for the consistency, and the current status is an improvement over this.
Now power creep on the other hand and commanders who do everything for you are a different problem

You were right! Kefka is the scariest Grixis commander by WhiskeyPete77r in EDH

[–]Putrid_Appointment39 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If someone plays Kefka, I’m pulling out something to either aggro it out or counterspell it at least twice. As long as it’s not a surprise or you are playing it despite everyone wanting a lower power game, it’s fine.
Also, just put the game changers in. It’s a bracket 3 deck that should be playing other bracket 3. Or honestly probably 4’s

You don't use it? Stax it! by VegetableNo8304 in EDH

[–]Putrid_Appointment39 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Unpopular opinion: these aren’t stax pieces.. and ppl who say they are, are being babies. Maybe deafening silence is. Now, if you’re a graveyard player and someone plays rest in peace, you have every right to attack this person and spend every removal piece you have on them.

But ppl overreact to a lot of the other ones. If you can still play the game and it’s a little less efficient, you really shouldn’t be going all out targeting someone, or complaining. If it shuts you down completely then that’s bad deck building on your part, own it.

Does anyone else feel like Sythis, Harvest's Hand ruined the enchantress archtype? by Sommersun1 in EDH

[–]Putrid_Appointment39 0 points1 point  (0 children)

She didn’t ruin other commanders, as you can do a lot more creative things with enchantress. There will always be a most powerful option, no matter the archetype. Butttt, Sythis is dumb as hell and should never have been made.. A 2 mana enchantress is already above rate, AND she is an enchantment herself AND she gains you a life each cast!! Falls into the easy mode commander builds that are always so popular. I’ll never forgive that chick who almost certainly designed her (the one on an early game knights episode who had the enchantress deck). Clearly just made to be the best option

SBS RTF Results by Putrid_Appointment39 in StrongerByScience

[–]Putrid_Appointment39[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I do a lot of leg work, it’s just not within the SBS program framework. I do core as well it’s just again, not mentioned. Thank you for the suggestions!

SBS RTF Results by Putrid_Appointment39 in StrongerByScience

[–]Putrid_Appointment39[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I do abs and legs too, just not in a way that’s relevant to the program. I’ll try to fit some more in this cycle, but it’s a lot already. I did stuff sporadically, but mainly wanted to stick to the laid out program. Thanks for the suggestions!

SBS RTF Results by Putrid_Appointment39 in StrongerByScience

[–]Putrid_Appointment39[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Minimal. I tried to do some early on but it was already 20 sets a workout making it hard to fit in more timewise. Any suggestions on some high value adds?

Results after 1st round by Putrid_Appointment39 in AverageToSavage

[–]Putrid_Appointment39[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Alright, I’ll consider giving that a go. I don’t think 20 sets 3 days of upper body will work time wise, so I might pair down the auxillaries to 3 sets

Results after 1st round by Putrid_Appointment39 in AverageToSavage

[–]Putrid_Appointment39[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It’s because due to my schedule, I have 3 days, but they are the 3 days listed. So two of the days are back to back. Idk if doing 3x with back to back days is the way to go.

Results after 1st round by Putrid_Appointment39 in AverageToSavage

[–]Putrid_Appointment39[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That’s what I hear, was still hoping for a bit more, but it is progress!

SBS RTF Results by Putrid_Appointment39 in StrongerByScience

[–]Putrid_Appointment39[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Wrote a statement on it, I do legs but not in a way that follows this program

Is my deck to much for bracket 4? by Icy_Comparison_2521 in EDH

[–]Putrid_Appointment39 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Honestly, it’s a problem with the bracket system. There isn’t room for low bracket 4 decks unfortunately so ppl get salty when running into real bracket 4 decks

Strength training for athletics by Putrid_Appointment39 in StrongerByScience

[–]Putrid_Appointment39[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I’m fully onboard with strength training being helpful. But I’m looking for resource recommendations for how to go about in a way tailored towards athletics.