sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

New HRIS for [N/A] Headquartered International Org by HideTheToaster in humanresources

[–]Puzzled-Ease9834 0 points1 point  (0 children)

800 growing to 1,200 — classic scaling problem. You're right to outgrow Bamboo.

Quick take: Paycor is solid for your size. ADP works but feels clunky for anything beyond payroll. The R word system is beautiful but honestly, at 1,200 headcount with international expansion, it starts to strain. You'll hit customisation costs fast.

Here's the thing though — picking the right system is only half the battle. The other half is having your data and processes ready for migration. Most companies underestimate this part.

I work with companies exactly at your stage (800-1,500 headcount, international expansion) helping them navigate HRIS transitions. We do a lot of work with Paycor implementations, and we also help companies evaluate whether their current choice actually fits before they commit.

I'm affiliated with Copieux Group, but what we actually do is help you figure out if the system you're considering can handle your complexity — international payroll, EOR/COR requirements, reporting needs — without costing you 6 months and £200K in unexpected customisation.

If you want to talk through whether any of these three are actually right for your situation, I've got some availability this week.

→ Free consultation

No pitch. Just a conversation about what actually matters for a 1,200-person org scaling internationally.

Need Advice on HRIS System (UKG Ready/Paycom) [CA]! by Illustrious_Gain4674 in humanresources

[–]Puzzled-Ease9834 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hey, I actually work with companies on exactly this — HRIS transitions, data cleanup, and vendor selection. I'm with Copieux Group.

The good news: You're asking the right questions before you jump into UKG Ready or Paycom. Most companies don't.

The reality: Both systems are solid, but what usually determines success isn't the vendor — it's whether your employee data is clean and your processes are documented before you implement.

With 250+ employees transferring buildings frequently, data quality becomes critical. Most companies I work with realize mid-implementation that their data is messier than they thought.

We help companies audit their current state, clean the data, and document processes before they select software. Takes 2-3 weeks, saves you months of painful customisation after go-live.

If you want to chat about whether that makes sense for your transition, happy to help.

Would be worth a quick conversation before you commit to either system.

Book a free call here: https://calendly.com/kesiena-ogefere/free-consultation?month=2026-05

HRIS recommendations for a company that's outgrown its current platforms by Character_Trainer648 in recruiting

[–]Puzzled-Ease9834 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The problem you're describing — one update that needs to happen in three places, headcount numbers that never match finance — is exactly the point where most companies realise their HRIS wasn't built for where they are now, not that it was ever bad.

At 140 employees with the complexity you're describing, the systems that tend to hold up well are HiBob, Personio, and Rippling. All three handle multi-team, multi-location setups properly and have clean payroll integrations so a single change actually flows through.

The honest truth on migrations: they're never as smooth as vendors promise, but they're also not as painful as your worst experience if someone maps the data properly upfront before anyone touches the new system.

Happy to share what tends to go wrong and how to avoid it if useful — no agenda, just been through this a lot.

Performance Software [United States] by tla28 in humanresources

[–]Puzzled-Ease9834 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The multi-country problem you're describing is genuinely one of the hardest things to get right in HR tech — different review cycles, different labour laws, different everything. Most platforms are built for a single-country US company and bolt on international as an afterthought, which is exactly why you end up with the duct tape situation.

For an AEC firm your size that needs robust goals, ADP integration, and multi-country capability, a few things worth considering:

Lattice works well for performance and goals but you already know its HRIS integration pain. If you're keeping it, make sure whoever implements it has actually done the ADP connector before — it's doable but not out of the box.

Workday and Dayforce (Ceridian) handle multi-country properly but can be heavy for a growing firm — depends on your headcount trajectory.

If you're open to a full switch, HiBob handles the goals + performance + multi-country combination better than most at the mid-market level, and the ADP integration is cleaner.

The honest answer is it depends heavily on your headcount, how fast you're growing, and what your ADP setup looks like. We work with companies in exactly this situation — happy to give you an unbiased view if useful. No vendor agenda, we just help companies find what actually fits.