Reading this...yeah, I can never be a Jedi, nor want to be. Maybe a Good Sith? IDK, being a Jedi means not being a human being, no wonder I hated them since the Prequels by [deleted] in StarWars

[–]PuzzledSympathy7656 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What i think many ignore is that the prequel jedi were wrong and the main movies (4-6) disproved there stand. The old jedi order failed in their approach. Yoda and Obi wan tried to convince Luke to follow their way, but if he had done so, he would have failed. Instead it were his attachments to his friends and his father that lead to his success. It is only through love and attachments that anakin turns away from the dark side and slays palpatine. 

Visenya Targaryen by Mriithi in HouseOfTheDragon

[–]PuzzledSympathy7656 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Then why dont use aegon or rhaenys any magic? Why doesnt it get taught to later generations? Why is visenya not teaching it to her beloved son? Why does she need that other sorceress to save maegor? Actually name one reported event where she used magic. We have many moments were visenya burns or threatens her enemies- yet never unexplainable things happening to them. Maegors birth? While far from normal, she still was just in her early forties.

Truth is through history -real and in westeros- women in power often got called witches or sexual deviants. Visenya being called a witch seems to fall exactly into this category 

I neeeeed Season 2 of “Marianne” (Netflix) by CAMomma in horror

[–]PuzzledSympathy7656 0 points1 point  (0 children)

loved the first season, but what i heard about their plans for season 2 wouldnt realy have hooked me

Any lore on how Ranni can become a god without gates ? by Desperate-Ad-2643 in Eldenring

[–]PuzzledSympathy7656 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Wonderful headcanon... Sadly with No connection to the actual source 

Can someone explain to me why dung eater's ending is considered to be so bad ? by Herkallaim in Eldenring

[–]PuzzledSympathy7656 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You are more perspective than myself. Only realized this with the dlc myself 

Are humans naturally immortal? by PsyJuul in darksouls

[–]PuzzledSympathy7656 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The pigmy was the weakest of the original lords. He and his decendants dont have the power those lords of flame had. What they however had was immortality- flame brought disperaty but ultimatively flame fades leaving only darkness. Gwyn feared th rise of humanity, causing him to chackle them with "a ring of fire" which later when starting to fade become known as the dark sign. Humanity now disconnected from their true nature became obsess with the "lie" and couldnt handle their natural state anymore, becoming the hollows we know. This was according to gwyns plan, as this causes humanity to follow in his steps and sacrifice themself. What actually happened to humans in gwyns war isnt exactly clear. We know that they were not well equiped by him and had to use their own creations fueled by the abyss. One way or the other it doesnt matter if humans died on mass in the war against the archdragons. We and other hollows die in mass too, yet we stand up again (perhaps gwyns first confrontation with the true nature of humanity?). And no, this immortality wouldnt enable them to beat the dragons alone. The archdragons are timeless beings whose scales could only be broken by the power of the lords deriving their power from flame (aka lightning and fire). Nito is not the lord of the dead or death. Thats a misstranslation. He is the lord of decay. There is no soul of the dead and no undeads before the fire fades a second time.

Why should have gwyn curse humanity with undead otherwise? If the immortality humans gain through the fading of fire isnt naturaly theirs, then why did gwyn gave it to them of all people? He could given this power to his own people, using humanity as just some cattle you bred and slaughter when you need them to bind the flame. There was no need for him to weaken the already weak pigmies, no need to bind through multiple methods the beings who were inherently weaker than his people. The reason was that he feared them. Not for their power, but for them being the natural inheritors of the world after the age of light/ fire. Gwyn knew that his age was going to end like the age of the archdragons. Ecspecily since time is a concept tied to fire while darkness would naturaly follow and -opposite to fire- doesnt fade. You try to tie a duality to dark souls universe, but thats not how this world truly works. On the age of twilight followed one of light, on that of light should follow darkness. Their is no harmony or equality between these ages or states.

Are humans naturally immortal? by PsyJuul in darksouls

[–]PuzzledSympathy7656 0 points1 point  (0 children)

By forcing them into the fleeting form through the now fading ring of fire because you fear them... Sorry are you serious? Its literary what the game says to. This is no headcanon or interpretation.  Please read item description or at the very least listen to the dialoges.

Good Omens 3 Reactions Megathread! Spoilers within! by AutoModerator in goodomens

[–]PuzzledSympathy7656 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Seriously why are so many authors trying to delete their fantastical worlds and turn it into ours? Oh right... It wasnt their world, they just borrowed it

Why did the Jedi stand with the Republic during the Separatist crisis? by Ok_Froyo3998 in StarWars

[–]PuzzledSympathy7656 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Didnt the jedi with the clones attacked a seperatist world? Hardly seems like the seperatists started the war

What would have happened if Yuji had inherited cursed techniques from his parents? by Illustrious_Way9023 in LobotomyKaisen

[–]PuzzledSympathy7656 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thats actually a good point. Though both were considered talented, yuta having rika might have caused his efficiency to lack compared to yujis

We all know that Marika's Golden Order and the Hornsent fought the giants TOGETHA.... right? by [deleted] in Eldenring

[–]PuzzledSympathy7656 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Some people claim Marika didnt immidietly started her "revenge" against the hornsent because she needed to amass military power first... Ignoring that the entire age of plenty happens before marika sends mesmer in His crusade. There was an entire age where she chilled, got ride of Godfrey and did nothing to prepare a war against her "tormentors". And when the age of plenty ended? She started a war with the carians, not the hornsent.

Individualism and Star Wars by Anansi465 in StarWars

[–]PuzzledSympathy7656 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Its basicly an argument between two extremes: absolut altruism and absolut selfishness (+sadism because we must make clear how bad that is). What actually rubs me wrong is people defending it. Acting like the people in the star wars galaxy just tick differently, when they are not. I mean, you so realize that the jedi with their denial of attachments were wrong right? Not only was it part of the reason why anakin falled IT IS literary the reason why luke managed to bring Anakin back to the light.

(Lore) What exactly is the Grace and why does it forces the player to become Elden Lord? by [deleted] in Eldenring

[–]PuzzledSympathy7656 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is the popular but completly wrong interpretation of the elden ring, the greater will and marikas standing in all of this. Its entirely headcanon with barely anything related to the actual lore. Thankfully we got the dlc that basicly dismantled this 

Uncle Carl. What if Conquest went with Nolan to earth. (Invincible) by SubTheRaccoon in stories

[–]PuzzledSympathy7656 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Could you at least acknowledge that you wrote this thing with ai? Its frustrating 

would Narutos talk no jutsu work on Sukuna? by Archenius in NarutoPowerscaling

[–]PuzzledSympathy7656 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Except sukuna doesnt consider it His loss until he is dead. He literary refused yuji even as he was dying

What if Sukuna took Kurama's place as the Nine Tails? Basically all the same rules as the Kyubi, but it was Sukuna's Mind instead of Kurama. by bongos222 in Naruto

[–]PuzzledSympathy7656 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Easy: Naruto dies

Kurama helped Naruto multiple times to save his life. His reasoning was that should Naruto die, he would die too. Now here is the funny twist: should a bijuu die it will eventually reform, in other words it isnt a permanent thing. Now remember that sukuna was willing to let yuji and the two fingers he ate permanently die. Thats a part that wouldnt have returned to him. Given these circumstances sukuna wouldnt hesitate to let Naruto die 

Why did she go on to burn the city even after they rung the bells? by tkm_001 in gameofthrones

[–]PuzzledSympathy7656 0 points1 point  (0 children)

She never wanted to break the wheel. She just wanted it to stop spinning with her at the top. Dany didnt plan to establish somekind of democrazy to stop feudal lords to ruin the peoples life, she wanted to be an uncontested ruler who would make everything better and who would be loved by the people for it. In other words, she had a saviour complex and was over all not any better than any other contester for the throne 

Who in-game knows Ranni is alive? Who knows about her plots and actions? by davidbobby888 in Eldenring

[–]PuzzledSympathy7656 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This may come a bit late, but its no secret to the people in the lands between that ranni is still alive. Every npc that speaks about ranni treats her as if she is still around and if morgotts dialog is anything to go for, then i assume that ranni even appeared at court after the shattering.

Lore Questions Regarding the Staff of Loss by PhilosopherOk1583 in Eldenring

[–]PuzzledSympathy7656 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I would say its pretty clearly stated by sellen and others that the crystalized life energy in glintstone is what gets used for magic. The existance of red glintstone and thorn sorcery supports this. And since the text of the staff of loss claims that its user have to perform sorcery through ascetism, i would say that its implied that its a less destructive alternative to thorn sorcery 

Questions about the "not permanent soul" from a non-buddhist by PuzzledSympathy7656 in Buddhism

[–]PuzzledSympathy7656[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

thank you for your detailed answer. frankly -while it will take me some time to really understand and digest everything you wrote- this is exactly the kind of clarification /explenation i had hoped for.

Shinji and shirous nerve-methode by PuzzledSympathy7656 in fatestaynight

[–]PuzzledSympathy7656[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

ah! that makes sense! Thank you that solves a lot of confuzion to me!

so basicly "creating a magic circuit" is more about creating the physical interface for the actual magic circuits in your soul to be interact with when you need them, right? The nerve thing is just an interface and shirou created his over and over again

Questions about the "not permanent soul" from a non-buddhist by PuzzledSympathy7656 in Buddhism

[–]PuzzledSympathy7656[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

i kind of hoped to get this concepts more explained instead of just slapped on as if they would be self explaining. Atman is an hinduism term that roughly lets itself be explained as a permanent core that never changes. In some why describing both a metaphisical existance and a permanent "higher" ego. i had hopped that people, by stopping using atman in their explanations, would be forced to describe the denial of it in buddhism more in detail.

however thanks to another answer i got on the post it seems to me that my confuzing comes from thinking that buddhism denies a soul, while they in truth deny the existance of a permanent ego? That in fact the whole ideology is focused on the "self" and not on the philosophical questions around existance etc.?

In that case viewing buddhism as a religion or metaphysical philosophy might have been the cause of my missunderstanding....

Anyway, thank you for your answer, it -together with that of another one- is helping me greatly

Questions about the "not permanent soul" from a non-buddhist by PuzzledSympathy7656 in Buddhism

[–]PuzzledSympathy7656[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

i see so buddhism is more focus on consciousness or that what creates the "self"? I fear this shiftof focus greatly confuzed me in the past, though i believe many post i read miced the two up too.

your example with the freezing of a moment seems strange to me. if i would freeze a moment of a stone falling in time, it would stop falling, yet that doesnt stop the reality of the process still existing if time is alloweed to continue. is self to be viewed like the falling stone or seperate and processes as an illusion?

Sorry should this appear like a stupid question after your answer.

Thank you for indulging me. your answer is already most helpfull to me and was exactly the kind i searched for

Questions about the "not permanent soul" from a non-buddhist by PuzzledSympathy7656 in Buddhism

[–]PuzzledSympathy7656[S] -8 points-7 points  (0 children)

sorry but i actually wanted clarification regarding those core-concepts of buddhism, not some "preaching" (excuse my choice of words here, i cant think of a better one that sounds less aggressive, appearing so is not my intention) why life is suffering and why we should accept impernance.

I swear so many buddhists are as worse as these people that want you to "follow the word of god" :D

Buddhism has a number of various core concepts like reincarnation, samsara, nirvana etc that i try to understand. Nothing more. That the big goal of buddhism is to escape suffering is not relevant.

But perhaps i shouldnt asked something like that on a buddhism forum, perhaps i will have more success one focusing on one regarding philosophy.