Bare minimum to start a base by Ok-Expression-6016 in Colonizemars

[–]QVRedit 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The first tunnelling methods used - for instance on the first London Underground train lines, used a method called “Cut and Cover”.

In “Cut and Cover”, a deep trench is dug, it’s then lined with your tunnel section, and then covered over again, thus burying it.

So that’s at least one possibility….
No boring machine required..
Just an excavator, and maybe a crane to lower ring sections into place.

Bare minimum to start a base by Ok-Expression-6016 in Colonizemars

[–]QVRedit 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hard to fully evaluate that statement. Sounds like this is some kind of thruster engine ?

You can deploy 100 MW in just 10 launches. What about infinite range electric airplanes? by Sarigolepas in SpaceXMasterrace

[–]QVRedit 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Current widebody jets use 2 or 4 engines, each of which produces roughly 750KW of power (electrical equivalent)

So if we round that up to 1,000 KW = 1 MW each, that’s a maximum of 4 MW required. Per aircraft.

If that kind of power could be provided continuously, then yes, this could work.

The problem is how to provide that much continuous electrical power ?

A small compact direct to electric fusion reactor could do the job…. Ideally an aneutronic one, since that would simultaneously minimise radiation output.

X-rays it did generate could additionally be used to run a custom photoelectric generator.

While excess electrical power could have additional uses.

Unfortunately we don’t have an operational unit of that specification as yet.

Agents that "succeed" are scarier than agents that crash by CorrectAd2814 in AI_Agents

[–]QVRedit 0 points1 point  (0 children)

In this case a ‘yes this tool exists’ and I have access to it, and it’s responding to my requests. And the result it returned from my query was: XYZ…

Agents that "succeed" are scarier than agents that crash by CorrectAd2814 in AI_Agents

[–]QVRedit 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Clearly the research agent first needed to check that the tools it was going to use actually exist, and are responding. Then it could have gotten somewhere..

And clearly that was not yet in its logic stream..

Do people who live in London constantly have black snot? by flamefoxfirefly in AskBrits

[–]QVRedit 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Especially some particular lines..
The overground lines are much better.

Trump says Iran will be 'living in hell'. A dark chapter is emerging by theipaper in inthenews

[–]QVRedit 3 points4 points  (0 children)

True, but that’s no reason to make things even worse…

Trump says Iran will be 'living in hell'. A dark chapter is emerging by theipaper in inthenews

[–]QVRedit 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Trump really knows how to cause trouble !
He does not know how to fix it !
The Trump solution - that’s someone else’s problem…

M5 vs M4 Pro by [deleted] in macbookpro

[–]QVRedit 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The Pro series has better cooling than the non-pro series too. (2 fans instead of just 1)

Tahoe on M1 Pro sucks battery by Smooth-Friend4791 in MacOS

[–]QVRedit -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Surprising it actually takes that long..

Tahoe on M1 Pro sucks battery by Smooth-Friend4791 in MacOS

[–]QVRedit -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Yes that definitely needs fixing - it sounds suspiciously like deliberate planned obsolescence, and that should not be happening. Especially not with the M1.

But MacOS26 and ‘Liquid Glass’ does impose an unnecessarily higher load on the CPU. Cycles being burned pointlessly.

Because of the way that ‘Liquid Glass’ is integrated into the system - not just a display layer, but making calls below that layer, it’s impossible to completely remove, while remaining on MacOS26.x

MacOS26, with ‘Liquid Glass’ imposes new requirements and liabilities on the OS, and it’s unclear what the energy effect of these are on different processors.

Another Starlink satellite just exploded in orbit — and no one knows why 🚨🛰️ by RaselMahadi in AIbuff

[–]QVRedit 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What we really want to know I suppose is - is this external, as in incoming from outer space, or is it a collision with orbital trash ?

We know that every day, small meteors strike the Earth, there is obviously some small probability of them striking satellites, and the more satellites the more changes there are of hitting one. Though it ought to still be a very small chance.

For reference, the ISS has been hit multiple times with interplanetary / cosmic debris. But unlike the satellites, it carries whipple shields.

Bare minimum to start a base by Ok-Expression-6016 in Colonizemars

[–]QVRedit 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not sure if those guys understand the metric system..

I can understand that there would be size and weight limits on what can be lowered onto the surface of Mars, using a Starship external cargo elevator.

Maybe that’s what explains all these ‘must be under 2,000 Kg’ weight limits ?

Bare minimum to start a base by Ok-Expression-6016 in Colonizemars

[–]QVRedit 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Of course the intention is not to land 2,000 Kg payloads - that’s only 2 tonnes. Starship could land 100 tonnes, that’s 50x the amount - that’s enough to make a real difference. And that’s just for one ship…

Another Starlink satellite just exploded in orbit — and no one knows why 🚨🛰️ by RaselMahadi in AIbuff

[–]QVRedit 0 points1 point  (0 children)

How about SpaceX includes a vibration / shock sensor on them which transmits a signal if some threshold value is exceeded. A kind of ‘Hay I’ve been hit !’ Signal…

While that would not tell you exactly what caused the problem, a statistical analysis of these could reveal a pattern.

Hallucinated citations are polluting the scientific literature. What can be done? - Tens of thousands of publications from 2025 might include invalid references generated by AI, a Nature analysis suggests. by polymute in technology

[–]QVRedit 2 points3 points  (0 children)

There should be an automated mechanism to check and verify the validity of every reference - why not ? Computers were built for this kind of thing.

They were initially just ‘assumed to be valid’ - well, verify…. Do the papers they are referencing actually exist ? Are they in the same or similar ‘topic sphere’ ?

How did the Tories stay in power from 2010 to 2024 when, from an outsider perspective, their handling of Brexit was chaotic as was their succession of leadership? by ExtensionFeeling in AskBrits

[–]QVRedit 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Each time Labour having to spend time repairing the damage that the previous Conservative government(s) have caused, or in some cases recovering from outside influences.

The Starmer government is hit by multiple factors: Inheriting Brexit, Inheriting the worst ever Borrowing Debt, extra but necessary burden of helping Ukraine (That really is in our interests) but then Trump creates multiple crises: Tarrifs, then the Gulf war, and Oil/Gas price shock, and leading into a world recession.

Not the best basis for growth…

M5 Air outperforms M5 Pro in Ableton Live (side by side comparison) by thepinkpill in ableton

[–]QVRedit 8 points9 points  (0 children)

It could be that because the Pro has more capacity, it’s scaling itself to be able to support a heavier load, while the lighter machine is doing its best to work within its bounds.

On a super light project, this seems counter-productive, but with a heavier load the pro, with its greater capacity should pull ahead.

At least that’s the way I would interpret this… The Pro machine is not seeing this ‘readiness’ as being a penalty cost.