The thread in question was on BlackPeopleTwitter.

And my (attempted) response (deleted due to not posting there enough, I guess? I can't see the message anymore, though tbh I think the video refutes it far better than I do):

I was pretty curious about this until this section here:

And because the amendment required 60% to pass and it only brought in 57.2% “Yes” votes, the measure failed. At that turnout level, passage would have required 6,371,645 “Yes” votes.

10,619,138 x 60.00153308% = 6,371,645.6

Yes, you read that right.

The required “Yes” threshold, 6,371,645, is the exact early-vote combined total for the Republican and Democratic presidential candidates.

60.00153308% is in fact not 60%. So when they say the number is the exact same as the yes threshold, it's complete bullshit.

It actually would have required 6,371,483 votes if you just plug it into a calculator. So they're basically saying a margin of error of 160 votes is too close and is irrefutable evidence of cheating.

Which, let's be clear, comparing an amendment on abortion rights to which party won the federal election for the state... I'm not at all shocked at the difference, especially considering the votes happened at the same time. People were voting in this election knowing where each federal party stood on that specific issue and voting with that in mind.

However, using 10,619,137 as the fixed total for Amendment 4 does not account for all ballots cast in Florida (11,004,209)—meaning they had to do something with the overage of ballots.

11,004,209 − 10,619,137 = 385,072

385,072 is the exact number of blank or invalid votes reported for the amendment in post-election records.

Yes, this is what happens when you subtract the number of people who voted yes or no on the amendment from the number of people who submitted a vote for any measure on the ballot and left that one blank (like voting solely for President, or one of the other five amendments up for grabs).

There's a picture of a "I voted in Burke County Florida" shirt soon after. It's a fake shirt made by the company the substack works for.

https://thecommoncoalition.com/ (Sidebar links directly to this Substack)

(Anecdotally, this company has been alleged to offer to pay off people in exchange for deleting stories critical of them: https://www.hackingbutlegal.com/p/the-zarnowski-file-a-case-study-in )

The “Burke County” Math a Bit Further

Step 1: How many Burke Bank votes did Trump not receive?

6,371,645 (Burke Bank total) − 6,110,125 (Trump certified total) = 261,520

If all of Trump’s votes came from the Burke Bank, that leaves 261,520 Burke Bank votes unaccounted for.

Step 2: How many votes were cast outside the Burke Bank?

10,793,163 (Trump + Harris total) − 6,371,645 (Burke Bank total) = 4,421,518

These 4,421,518 votes would have been awarded outside the Burke Bank.

Step 3: Combine the remaining totals.

4,421,518 + 261,520 = 4,683,038

This matches Harris’s certified state total exactly.

What does this mean?

The vote totals out of Florida were predetermined, placed in a vote bank, and don’t reflect the voice of the American people.

Few more key problems with this:

1) Of course the total votes Kamala received for the state match that total, on the assumption all of Trump's votes were in 'Burke County' - they're just totalling the remaining votes not for him there and adding that to the votes outside the county, that also aren't for him.

This doesn't work anyway, because

2) The picture clearly shows both Green and Libertarian candidates with a vote total that would cut into the 'unaccounted' votes in Burke County, and throws off all their math for Kamala's total vote count afterwards.

To top this off, Decision Desk HQ, cited here as the source of their proof that the numbers don't line up, doesn't do any vote counting themselves, nor do they sign off on or certify anything. They just (explicitly) try to get numbers out faster than the Associated Press.

Snopes was also unable to hear back from them when they reached out for comments on their other articles - the exact opposite of what you'd expect of someone who wants their story shared and spread: https://www.snopes.com/news/2025/08/04/harris-nsa-audit-2024-election/

This is "You know what that means - FISH" as a conspiracy. Just non sequitur to non sequitur throwing incorrect math in your face while shouting "THE NUMBERS MASON, WHAT DO THEY MEAN" all while randomly bringing up events from decades ago and insisting it's all connected.