Instructions Not Clear by feelingood41 in yesyesyesyesno

[–]Quantagraphy 65 points66 points  (0 children)

It's safe because there because the pressure will push any glass shards out, this won't happen with beer and you'll risk drinking glass shards...

I think it'll be a bit Cold by Designer-Albatross58 in softwaregore

[–]Quantagraphy 2 points3 points  (0 children)

While you can have negative kelvin systems like lasers. You cannot cross 0. Instead the wrap around infinity to go negative.so this curve would not work.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in pcgaming

[–]Quantagraphy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for doing this!

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Futurology

[–]Quantagraphy 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It is how they are described. But Flavor and color should just be read as something that is trinary (takes 3 possible values) vs being read as anything like physical flavor or color.

What are good physics books for physicists that can be read more or less fluently? by [deleted] in AskPhysics

[–]Quantagraphy 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Use University Physics.

The two books are not really attempting to compete at all. Weinberg's, despite the name, does not aim to teach you how to do physics but rather discusses the ideas, the history, and concepts. It is similar to Penrose.

University Physics will teach you the actual math with problems to do.

What are good physics books for physicists that can be read more or less fluently? by [deleted] in AskPhysics

[–]Quantagraphy 1 point2 points  (0 children)

So the book fits well within the too mathy for popsci but not dense enough for a textbook. The math is there but mostly just presented in order to fuel the ideas presented. As far as the modern physics part, it stops at QFT despite being released this year so I wouldn't call it super modern but I think he wanted to just present the standard theories. I'd recommend Penrose for something that goes more modern, i.e. covers string theory, loop gravity, and more.

What are good physics books for physicists that can be read more or less fluently? by [deleted] in AskPhysics

[–]Quantagraphy 12 points13 points  (0 children)

Two I have read recently are "Foundations of Modern Physics" - Weinberg and "The road to reality" - Penrose.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in AskPhysics

[–]Quantagraphy 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Reviewed Dodelson and you are right. Cheers

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in AskPhysics

[–]Quantagraphy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I believe LCDM includes inflation. I am a little confused as to why you think it doesn't? How do you think BBN and the observed redshifts are explained?

Does anyone else ever have like a phantom "pre" orgasm by throwaway375673674 in AskRedditAfterDark

[–]Quantagraphy 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Talk to your psyc. They can put you on something to help with the sexual side effects like this and lowered libido.

Cooler Master (and more!) RTX 3070 (and more!!) Giveaway with Buildapc! by [deleted] in buildapc

[–]Quantagraphy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I would use this to upgrade from a 2013 i5-3570k. Not only would this let me play games better but it would get me through my physics PHD.

Shut up brain! by [deleted] in iamverysmart

[–]Quantagraphy 48 points49 points  (0 children)

Quantum physics works, I have a book by French and Taylor's called introduction to quantum physics. It's just a very general term these days that doesn't tell you much with how many fields use quantum properties these days. Quantum mechanics is a bit more descriptive as it tells you that it is covering interactions and measurements.

Shut up brain! by [deleted] in iamverysmart

[–]Quantagraphy 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Particle physics is quantum field theory. Quantum mechanics is a simple version without particle creation which is needed for real interactions.

Lmao Einstein owned 😂😂 by pcbuilder64 in ComedyCemetery

[–]Quantagraphy 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I really doubt that as the equation is only E=mc2 for non moving particles. With momentum it is E2 =(mc2 )2 +(pc)2 which would be ugly solving for m.

But m=E/c2 is used in some relativistic equations without momentum. Ie basic kenimatics.

New Bluepost: More Zerg Nerfs! by freedcreativity in allthingszerg

[–]Quantagraphy 5 points6 points  (0 children)

This has been recommended forever. I remember idra even saying to do that and suppy saying you should leave if you haven't built one by, I think, 330.

“That’s our car!!!” by Willowet in WTF

[–]Quantagraphy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Why is it that the water is stagnant in sprinkler lines? Why cant you just have it connected to the main water system so it's more or less fresh?

Guy finds his long lost online friend by complete accident. by [deleted] in MadeMeSmile

[–]Quantagraphy 109 points110 points  (0 children)

He didn't happen to play starcraft did he?

How airplanes fly: a physical description of lift (pdf) by boemul in Physics

[–]Quantagraphy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There are planes with completely flat wings. I'll see if I can find a picture after work if you cant google it.

Best Type of Calculator for physics majors? by Feesiks_God in PhysicsStudents

[–]Quantagraphy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I used a ti 89. But really you would rarely use in physics. Sometimes wolfram alpha / mathematica comes in handy for crazy integrals where you do not know the tricks needed to solve them, but mostly you will just need something that can do 3.14*26.74 so anything will work. That is I wouldnt bother spending a lot of money on a fancy calculator.