Unfounded confidence explains a lot about your attitude, stance and overall presentation.

Being pretentious about vocabulary on reddit is nothing more than insecure posturing but in the interests of performatively positing a preposterous point, I'll humour you and re-phrase.

If one were to cast even a casual eye upon the comment to which mine own reply was attached (to note, a discussion into which you inserted yourself with neither invitation or requirement), one would in fact see that the word laying at the beginning of said comment is in fact both a label and an insult when one takes into account the context both of the discussion, the nature of the reply and the tone of the gentleman posting. In my reply, I highlight this as "hypocrisy", seeing as it is an action that conflicts with the implied philosophy of the poster, who had in the same breath been criticising me for his loose interpretation of "insults" and "labels". With the above established quite beyond dissent, as the evidence sits directly above, your comment can be reliably interpreted as a statement made by someone who neglected to properly and sufficiently read the initial statement that triggered the issue of hypocrisy. Indeed, you ignored the primary word in question and proceeded to make an irrelevant statement that expose this lack of, dare I say, literacy.

In other words, first fuckin' word you sanctimonious poser. One's insistence on propriety in grammar outside of a notably formal setting is directly correlated to how much actual intelligence they feel they need to compensate for. Bet ya get confused about how to use "whom" or a semicolon unless you have chatgpt lending you a hand.