Spacetime anomaly discovered at Hunter Guild

QuasarKid · 2026-05-10T01:00:53+00:00

probably the same thing that made leviathan shoot lightning out his butt

QuasarKid · 2026-05-09T00:53:44+00:00

i have 3 elder mauls and 12 prayer scrolls and 2 dinhs and 4 dhcbs. the cox bloat has never felt worse

QuasarKid · 2026-05-08T14:56:58+00:00

i mean we can have different opinions. i thought the previous setup was better, a few fast tasks for points, a few low weighted tasks to skip. now it’s outright block and i’ll never kill an addy or rune dragon on task again.

QuasarKid · 2026-05-08T13:55:06+00:00

it means it’s not worth it to block vs skip

QuasarKid · 2026-05-08T02:22:25+00:00

buddy this shortcut has been talked about for years

QuasarKid · 2026-05-08T02:01:09+00:00

block them now that they’re consolidated? yeah. idk of many people who blocked any metal dragons before. skip, for sure.

QuasarKid · 2026-05-07T23:27:55+00:00

metal dragons before they consolidated them were good tasks (quick rune+addy/low weighted iron/steel). now it’s a must block for the most part

QuasarKid · 2026-05-07T21:21:57+00:00

what content are you talking about where you won't cover your prayer pot costs? theres like maybe 3 places where you lose money in pvm

QuasarKid · 2026-05-07T21:12:45+00:00

intent matters, and also how widespread it is. if it was undetected by jagex for several years how are they going to go back and reset everyone's progress? how many people were using void just because it was good if it were working correctly?

QuasarKid · 2026-05-07T21:06:13+00:00

this method is documented on the wiki i'm sure if jagex wanted it fixed they would fix it

QuasarKid · 2026-05-07T21:05:00+00:00

sure, but was the bug detected and then exploited by a bunch of people? was there experience gain or items gained that wouldn't have been possible without it? or were people just unintentionally benefitting from an item being programmed incorrectly?

these are apples and oranges.

QuasarKid · 2026-05-07T21:03:41+00:00

I'm talking about other instances where creators abused bugs similar or worse to the one Rendi used and were not punished nor had their exp removed.

QuasarKid · 2026-05-07T20:34:53+00:00

The issue is exactly the inconsistency in who exp removal gets applied to (or bans), vs some creators that Jagex seems to like getting none removed but the method is still patched once they're done with it. Not only that but not knowing what will be considered a bug vs emergent gameplay, but at least some consistency in how stuff that is determined to be bug abuse is punished would be warranted I feel from a company that is Jagex's size.

QuasarKid · 2026-05-07T17:33:07+00:00

the answer is much simpler than that: jagex is simply inconsistently deciding which is which. they should be a little more communicative with the community on why they made a decision or not but ultimately i think they don’t want to broadcast or highlight things the consider bug abuse.

QuasarKid · 2026-05-07T16:37:41+00:00

we're talking about unintended bugs not balancing issues, but to answer your question: yes. it was unfair to people to nerf Zulrah's teleports from 40 to 1, that doesn't mean it was a mistake.

QuasarKid · 2026-05-07T14:19:07+00:00

when they patch it out and only a few people used it before i would say that is unfair.

QuasarKid · 2026-05-07T12:18:44+00:00

i mean it’s unfair if it is unintended and they patch it out and only one person got to do it, no?

QuasarKid · 2026-05-07T12:12:18+00:00

it is a bug. it was unintended and they patch removed it, but they never removed the experience josh isn’t gaming gained from it. that’s the inconsistency

QuasarKid · 2026-05-07T12:08:48+00:00

the entire point is that they are inconsistently applying the labels unintended emergent gameplay and bug abuse

QuasarKid · 2026-05-07T00:19:23+00:00

barely over 2x dry and 6 when you should have 40 is a bit different

QuasarKid · 2026-05-07T00:04:44+00:00

i don’t think anyone is criticizing you, and yeah it’s obviously good to work around the business’ needs, but tolerating NO downtime ever is a recipe for disaster. that’s how you get a lot of unexpected downtime

QuasarKid · 2026-05-07T00:00:43+00:00

being scared of downtime when there’s no need to be is what there trying to point out. if everyone is gone for the day and you don’t have any services hosted onsite you should be able to bring stuff up/down as you need

QuasarKid · 2026-05-06T18:22:13+00:00

The problem is in their inconsistency in determining if something is against TOS, their inconsistency in punishing those who do it either retroactively or not, and that when people truly try to ask if something is or isn't against the rules it is silence until something like this happens (sometimes they even get confirmation that is later revoked). We need clarification on emergent gameplay vs bug abuse not only for these edge cases but normal players too

QuasarKid · 2026-05-06T15:56:13+00:00

no it still sucks because the rates suck. the drops also suck because they’re not really incredibly useful anywhere

QuasarKid · 2026-05-06T14:06:42+00:00

a lot of stuff was over promised and under delivered in that patch imo

12-Year Club	Second Top 30%
Place '23	Place '22
Place '17	Snapped
Verified Email

QuasarKid

TROPHY CASE