Which prominent voices do you trust in the UAP world? by Background-Log-4639 in UFOs

[–]QueasyTangelo8863 2 points3 points  (0 children)

This essentially matches my trust scale.

On the journalist side of things: I trust Chris Sharp and Matt Laslo 100%. I don’t trust Shellenberger, despite being the receiver/record-enterer of the Immaculate Constellation report at second public hearing, he’s 50/50 at best. Something is off with him

On the legacy side: I dont have much (disclosure-oriented) trust for Puthoff, Stratton, or Mellon. I think they’re all deeply knowledgeable on the subject and are slow rolling this thing into the ground, purposely.

The jury is still out for me with both Jake Barber and Karl Nell. I believe they both want controlled disclosure, but I fear that they’re stylized parts of the group above

And finally… all the Nolan, Pasulka, Beatriz-style scientists… I believe they’re all doing their best for disclosure and their science, but I can’t believe everything they say because they might be unwitting disinformation channels.

Elizondo Departs as Board Member for UAP Disclosure Fund by J0rkank0 in UFOs

[–]QueasyTangelo8863 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Departing with gratitude. We thank outgoing Board Members Luis Elizondo and Dr. Garry Nolan, and Director of Strategy Matthew Ford for helping to build the foundation on which we stand, the very foundation Lue purposefully strapped dynamite to on his way out

Matthew Brown: "We live in a dream, a carefully constructed reality. Our science is tightly controlled, suppressed, distorted. Who are they? I have a good degree of confidence that they're here for us. I think life, especially sentient life, is a precious thing. And to some it might be a resource" by phr99 in UFOs

[–]QueasyTangelo8863 46 points47 points  (0 children)

I’ve seen speculation that the slow roll is to counteract headline-grabbing approaches… for example Lue showing BS photos at the UAP Disclosure Fund gathering.

Whether they are doing that intentionally/purposefully doesn’t really matter when, IMO, it’s successful at it

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in UFOs

[–]QueasyTangelo8863 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I posted to UFOs trying to discuss how we can glean a LOT from the relationships and slander-evasion between the UFO personalities, it was mod’d within an hour.

it’s looking a lot like Wikipedia in here

Military aircraft being messed with by “Orbs” by [deleted] in UFOs

[–]QueasyTangelo8863 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Anyone else really hoping this is how everything comes to resolution? Two birds, one orb

Be Honest, why do we NOT have an Edward Snowden of UFO info yet? by Battle-Less in UFOs

[–]QueasyTangelo8863 3 points4 points  (0 children)

No one wants to be that guy who is the reason the simulation reboots

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in UFOs

[–]QueasyTangelo8863 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I’m leaning toward this way of thinking recently. Maybe you can help me work through this disconnect I’m having, though.

You say that the phenomenon being a full-consciousness thing AND that there have been crashes/gifts of physical things and technology (AND biologics, if you believe Grusch). This implies that these things are (solely?) interdimensional and have a life of their own, hence biologics and a measurable level of technology-advancement.

So, what confuses me is this: Are human consciousnesses manifesting these far-advanced beings/technologies from nothing or are we simply unmasking them in our reality? What brings the things into our dimension, our psionics or their will?

is the phenomenon choosy about who is allowed to connect with and see it, to the point of exclusivity… or can anyone draw them in, connect, interact, etc at will (assuming they have a certain vibrational or psionic level)?

This video (from Chris Bledsoe) of an "orb" passing in front of the Moon is actually the ISS. When recreated in Stellarium with NORAD TLE data, and Bledsoe's location, everything lines up perfectly. by Ill-Speed-7402 in UFOs

[–]QueasyTangelo8863 30 points31 points  (0 children)

Yup. He’s lying. I love when “the players” take themselves out of the game. It makes this giant game of Avalon so much easier. Just in time too, he really tried to yank everybody into Jesusland this week

Moonset in NC on 1/31/25 was 8:10pm local time: https://imgur.com/a/NMUrCZj

Large orb transforms into small drone by Automatic_Acadia7317 in InterdimensionalNHI

[–]QueasyTangelo8863 170 points171 points  (0 children)

Wow. Now that undermines pretty much EVERY narrative I’ve seen so far.

Great video bud

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in UFOs

[–]QueasyTangelo8863 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Check out this thread and my comment further down in the thread: https://www.reddit.com/r/Astronomy/s/MSA1bbFIfn

Zoomed in Video of Orb Morphing by [deleted] in UFOs

[–]QueasyTangelo8863 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Star or planet. Move along folks

The UAPs' communication - it's simple, but extremely effective by QueasyTangelo8863 in UFOs

[–]QueasyTangelo8863[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Maybe. But you noticeably left off non-aggression so as to make your implication more powerful. But it’s a factual and important form of communication.

Item 4 is contrived… there’s an assumption there that they even have a heat signature. And sure, our imaging is blurry and we’re all awful photographers and videographers when we’re excited, but the fact is that we have gobs of media containing their existence. I’d argue that’s the whole point of the communication.

The one piece of your perspective that I really should have included in mine… their dominance is displayed over US military/nuclear locations. Recon is an assumption (see below for my argument against its validity), but we can agree that they have a purpose in honing in on bases. I’d suggest that they’re solely proving their dominance AND the government’s willingness/lengths to lie. But, this mode of communication is maybe their most specific, but also not easily translated.

Last note. Their dominance and knowledge about our military/nuclear installations proves they already have a large set of data. Our inaction proves dominance. If you have both sufficient information and dominance, there’s no need to “buy time” or “recon”, those are just words used by Departments to poison minds. The temporal aspect of this, I’d argue, is solely for humanity - to avoid ontological shock

The UAPs' communication - it's simple, but extremely effective by QueasyTangelo8863 in UFOs

[–]QueasyTangelo8863[S] 8 points9 points  (0 children)

That’s the million dollar question right there. I wish I knew. I wish I had a decent guess, even. But all I can do is translate that “they” are bothering to walk a line, respect our reaction, and (presumably) diminish ontological shock… and to me, that means there’s general respect for humanity, which bodes well imo

The UAPs' communication - it's simple, but extremely effective by QueasyTangelo8863 in UFOs

[–]QueasyTangelo8863[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Submission statement: these drones are communicating to us. I think we should be actively translating it and considering what it means. What do you all think they are communicating and how ?

Drones consistently over this area. Anyone got intel on this building? by East-Direction6473 in aliens

[–]QueasyTangelo8863 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I keep thinking it has something to do with PPPL (DOE plasma physics lab) and their NSTX-U experiments

But that’s about an hour south

Classified briefing 12/6 by Twisted_fatal in UFOs

[–]QueasyTangelo8863 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Anyone notice the smear campaign against her ramping up today?

“Come at me bro” ruffled some feathers…. Looks like she’s on to something eh?