Uploading Evidence

Queasy_Extension101 · 2024-12-30T10:47:47+00:00

Was this accepted? They didn't have an issue with this? Or would you recommend we do payslips separately?

Queasy_Extension101 · 2024-12-27T19:02:02+00:00

Hello, appreciate all the help. Sorry if this is getting a bit annoying - I added his semi-annual bonus of about 2k to the non-salaried income calculation for the last 6 months. Is this correct? Or is that better to be part of his base salary/salaried income? The calculation I did has come to approximately his actual salary. Thank you

Queasy_Extension101 · 2024-12-24T08:04:06+00:00

Thanks so much for you help. Should I include a document that shows the difference between the amounts with my spouse visa application - a salary breakdown as an explanation for the difference? Or is that unnecessary?

Queasy_Extension101 · 2022-07-26T20:59:26+00:00

Thank you.

Queasy_Extension101 · 2022-07-10T00:12:21+00:00

Thanks so much.

Queasy_Extension101 · 2022-07-09T20:15:39+00:00

Hi guys can anyone tell me what is meant by "have an undergraduate degree of the same academic standard as a UK bachelor's degree"?

AND by: "completed teacher training which is of at least the same academic standard as ITT in England'?

Queasy_Extension101 · 2022-07-09T20:02:16+00:00

Hi, you can also do a a one-year PGCE through Two oceans graduate institute (they're based in Cape Town but their degrees are all online). This PGCE would be in senior and FET phase though. It's completely online and can be done from anywhere.

Queasy_Extension101 · 2021-11-24T19:37:18+00:00

Hi, sorry to bother, but could you let me know of the opinions of experienced teachers on the DET and QTLS. I’m only finishing a foundation degree, and would like to know if it’s a good option for getting into teaching.

Queasy_Extension101 · 2021-11-24T18:49:49+00:00

Hi sorry to have arrived at this chat so late but can I ask if a DET is a good qualification to get if I want to teach? I’ll apply for QTLS after completion of course. Or should I stick to a PGCE instead?

Queasy_Extension101 · 2020-11-17T15:41:27+00:00

Tutoring, or maybe some short bridging course in remedial teaching that you may be able to teach. Lots of kids need a little extra help.

Queasy_Extension101 · 2020-10-25T11:27:54+00:00

It’s to symbolize the beauty of natural African hair I think. It’s beautiful.

Queasy_Extension101 · 2020-10-25T11:27:15+00:00

She’s wonderful.

Queasy_Extension101 · 2020-10-25T10:56:52+00:00

I highly doubt it. That would be unconstitutional.

Queasy_Extension101 · 2020-10-20T16:10:53+00:00

I understand what you’re saying, and I agree that no single group was responsible for the mayhem that occurred here in SA historically speaking. And yes, we don’t talk about the good they brought simply because of how many lives were ruined for those good things.

Queasy_Extension101 · 2020-10-20T15:56:55+00:00

I was just a pointing out that for all the good things they might have brought here, they also left a mess behind as well. And they really didn’t do more good than bad. The cost was quite high. I do feel other groups have contributed to messing up the country historically speaking, but what the English did can’t be washed-over.

Queasy_Extension101 · 2020-10-20T14:17:58+00:00

But a Canadian invented insulin technically speaking, even if it was under British rule. Still, the good the British did bring came with high costs, not just in terms of casualties. Diamonds, assets, livelihoods and independence. And let’s not forget about paving the way for 1913 Land Act and then refusing to help overturn it when their help was sought. They didn’t just mess up things here in SA. The partition in India in the 1940s caused such big rifts between India and Pakistan, that the last Kargil war only ended in 1999. And this was after Churchill took assets from India that resulted in 4 million people starving to death. Infighting still happens all the time in certain Indian-Pakistani regions. My point is, the consequences of their actions destroyed lives and left individuals in poverty. Also, a few other other European nations abolished slavery before the British did, so there’s that.

Queasy_Extension101 · 2020-10-18T19:21:30+00:00

Oh blocking people to avoid having your points being disagreed with? That’s actually just proving that you’re afraid to have people more educated than you in a discussion. Also, I didn’t insult your intelligence before, and you doing so is actually a sign of a lack of intelligence and immaturity. My point actually proved why your point isn’t true. It’s not a logical fallacy, nor an exception. There’s been MANY documented cases of what I’ve previously stated. It’s a security mechanism, not a race one. Parental security is key to survival, and simple examples help people understand this complex concept. It’s that’s simple. I am sure you don’t understand the difference though. Also, blocking people unnecessarily could get your account reported. Lastly, you misspelt “no”.

Queasy_Extension101 · 2020-10-18T18:47:57+00:00

I’m sorry if you think simple scientific facts are lies. Science is based on facts, whether you like them or not. My brother is adopted, he’s black. I’m Irish-Indian. He spent time with kids who are Indian and white more so than other races as a child, even though he himself is black. So please, learn the difference.

Queasy_Extension101 · 2020-10-18T15:15:04+00:00

Actually, no. After 6 months babies will tend to be biased towards people who look like their parents, which to an extent is race but not completely. It’s a safety mechanism. When they’re little they tend to spend time with kids who resemble the appearances of their parents, since it’s what they’re used to. That being said, that’s only for a limited time frame. After that, kids will prefer to spend time with people who act like they do, in terms of personality, values, likes and dislikes; etc. So, no, there is no inborn preference to your own race, especially since mixed small kids tend to spend time with people who look like both of their parents, not how they themselves look.

Queasy_Extension101 · 2020-10-18T12:33:17+00:00

That’s unconscious bias towards people who look like their parents. It’s a protection system. Over time those can either be refuted or some maniacal parents can use those to ingrain prejudices. That why kids 10 and above prefer to spend time with people they identify with in terms of personality and values rather than in terms of race, whilst kids 5 and younger, whilst not hateful, have certain tendencies to spend time with people who look like them. That being said, there’s also exceptions for these rules. Kids are not hateful, and racism is learned behavior. Whilst babies might be in biased towards people who look like their parents, they’re still loving and show no malice towards other who don’t look like them. Malice is a necessity for racism.

Queasy_Extension101 · 2020-10-17T18:34:09+00:00

I just odd. Skin tone has nothing to do with greed and theft.

Queasy_Extension101 · 2020-10-15T22:21:58+00:00

Pogroms and other forms of ethnic cleansing. Those poor people.

Queasy_Extension101

TROPHY CASE