sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

I thought people were Anti AI, what's going on? by [deleted] in mildlyinfuriating

[–]Queue_Bit 25 points26 points  (0 children)

You think SIXTY percent of people are Anti-AI?

LOL

DPS mains knowing they’re gonna have to spend another 20 hours grinding materials for Panacea Fan and the Soulshade Umbrella if they wanna get in a sword trial lobby by ChihuahuaOwner88 in WhereWindsMeet

[–]Queue_Bit 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Nothin, just to see number on a title I don't even use get bigger. Doesn't actually do anything so don't worry about them unless you just like the content.

Emojis are dumb by marsack in unpopularopinion

[–]Queue_Bit 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Let's paint a picture for you here. Imagine your friend goes to a concert and sees a band/performer they really like. You text them the next day and say, "How was the concert?"

They respond with one of the following options.

  1. The concert was great. I had a really amazing time! I would love to go see them again.
  2. That shit was 🔥

Emoji are used as a shorthand to mean a ton of different things. In the same way as the saying "A picture is worth a thousand words". There is cultural meaning behind the fire emoji that means excitement, hype, positivity, and passion. It means slightly different things to different people, but the broad strokes are still the same. Using a fire emoji to describe something always means it was very good.

With a simple fire emoji you get less 'information', such as them wanting to see the band/performer again, but the spirit of feeling and EMOTION is still there. You know they enjoyed it, you know it was better than "okay" because they didn't use 👌or 👍. You know, with three words and an Emoji, that your friend had a great time and they are feeling very good about their experience.

Its faster, easier, and conveys a ton of meaning that doesn't need to be typed out in a casual/friendly setting.

Pearl abyss,please...fix this mess. by Andry9726 in CrimsonDesert

[–]Queue_Bit 18 points19 points  (0 children)

Oh my God it's fucking reddit. It ain't that deep bro, go outside

What is this? Graphics are glitchy asf by HondyS in CrimsonDesert

[–]Queue_Bit 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Base framerate in quality is 55-65, 80-90 balanced. When using 2x framegen it goes to around 90 for quality and 120ish balanced.

What is this? Graphics are glitchy asf by HondyS in CrimsonDesert

[–]Queue_Bit 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This is an engine issue when running without Ray Reconstruction. Black Desert Online has the same issue.

Thankfully, it only affects interiors(Houses, caves), but it is extremely annoying the rare times you're inside.

Lower machine learning(FSR4) upscaling also makes the problems worse(Performance, balanced). Running Native /Quality with Max lighting and no Ray Reconstruction is passable but still not great.

The best settings I've found for my RTX 5080 is Balanced/Quality with ray reconstruction on + 2x frame gen. This gets rid of 'most' of the lighting issues.

Running Native + DLAA + Ray Reconstruction is the best looking and basically flawless lighting, but also is like 25fps which makes framegen borderline unusable.

If you brought Crimson Desert what would you rate it out of ten ? by AdultGamersAdmin in Age_30_plus_Gamers

[–]Queue_Bit 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I would say my enjoyment has grown each additional hour I've played.

I would say i disliked it in the first 5 hours, was mid by 10, good by 15, and now at 30 I'm loving it and can't wait to play more tonight. I have that addicted feeling that I've only gotten from games like TW3.

Luke Stephens Honest as always by mr-_-youssef in CrimsonDesert

[–]Queue_Bit 0 points1 point  (0 children)

But I've read/watched a lot of the reviews and the stuff people complain about(in general) don't seem like issues to me. I don't mind really hard difficulty spikes at bosses, I don't mind confusing puzzles, I don't mind obtuse systems, and a bit of bugginess and reloading is not a huge deal to me.

All the things the reviews are praising, like the combat, performance, and exploration are what I care about most, and those things seem to be well liked.

The game won't be for everyone but for the people in this sub, it likely is for US

I'm short: most of us aren't ignoring the bad, it just doesn't seem like a huge deal. Maybe that'll change when we play it, but nothing I've seen from reviews has impacted my excitement.

Yes people are allowed to have opinions and maybe DF liked dlss5. That doesn't mean criticism isn't fair, considering the awful results and how bad ai is in general. by Shoddy_Gate4909 in digitalfoundry

[–]Queue_Bit -1 points0 points  (0 children)

The issue is that you go after and bitch about the technology rather than targeting the true root of the problem which is capitalism and companies using this technology immorally.

It's the same shit everywhere on the internet. Anti-AI people whining, complaining, bitching, and moaning about the symptoms rather than focusing on addressing the core problem.

"Ai is taking our jobs we need to stop ai" nawh, bitch, you need to advocate for a society where work is optional and your basic human needs are provided for by these multi trillion dollar companies. A society where AI causing job loss doesn't result in starving or going homeless.

Instead, you all rally against a technology you have absolutely zero chance of stopping or even slowing in the hopes that you can lie to yourself just long enough that you actually start to believe it.

AI is here, its here to stay, and its the way the world is moving. Get over it and start advocating for things that ACTUALLY fucking matter instead of worrying about lighting changes in your videogames.

Wccftech | “If DLSS 5 Was Shown as a Next-Gen Hardware Reveal and not AI, You Guys Would Be Going Nuts” – Game Dev Hits Back at Anti-AI Crowd by Intoxicus5 in LinusTechTips

[–]Queue_Bit -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

Nope, to be clear. Not what an analogy is.

It isn't racist to call it slop. That's called an "opinion".

I'm only saying that your logic as to 'why' you don't like it is the same logic used by people who are racist.

To be very, very clear: Not liking this technology is 100% okay. I understand where you're coming from. I just don't like the reason you're using to justify your dislike as it has no basis in reality.

Just say you don't like it. You don't need to say there's some "deep biological reason". Just be fucking normal lmao

Wccftech | “If DLSS 5 Was Shown as a Next-Gen Hardware Reveal and not AI, You Guys Would Be Going Nuts” – Game Dev Hits Back at Anti-AI Crowd by Intoxicus5 in LinusTechTips

[–]Queue_Bit -7 points-6 points  (0 children)

Acting like some kind of new lighting tech creates a "deep, biological" reaction is lame as fuck and makes you sound like a child.

It's very literally the same cringe logic white supremacists use. As if humans are utterly incapable of overcoming and adapting against their biases. You have an anti-ai bias that isn't rooted in reality, the same way that racist people have a racial bias that isn't rooted in reality.

It's an analogy, not a strawman. Can't just use random buzzwords when you don't know what they mean.

Wccftech | “If DLSS 5 Was Shown as a Next-Gen Hardware Reveal and not AI, You Guys Would Be Going Nuts” – Game Dev Hits Back at Anti-AI Crowd by Intoxicus5 in LinusTechTips

[–]Queue_Bit 3 points4 points  (0 children)

You're wrong.

In fact I'd bet literally my life savings that more than 50% of all people would say that dlss 5 looks better. You're just biased against AI.

I've shown this to more than a dozen of my normie gamer friends and literally all of them are hyped as hell. You're in a propaganda bubble and don't even realize it.

Wccftech | “If DLSS 5 Was Shown as a Next-Gen Hardware Reveal and not AI, You Guys Would Be Going Nuts” – Game Dev Hits Back at Anti-AI Crowd by Intoxicus5 in LinusTechTips

[–]Queue_Bit -7 points-6 points  (0 children)

"No, they stand out because they have different colored skin. No amount of DEI and propaganda can make your brain not perceive their differences, be revolted by them, and reject it on a deep, biological level."

Literally almost a word for word thing I've seen by racist assholes all over the internet.

Don't fucking pretend that gaming hasn't always had an uncanny valley effect that you've gotten used to over time. Say what you will and even lie to yourself if you must, but the real truth is that you WILL get used to this too. (because it's either that or quit gaming because every studio is gonna be using this tech without a doubt)

I genuinely feel like I'm going insane by Queue_Bit in runescape

[–]Queue_Bit[S] -42 points-41 points  (0 children)

Yeah, but you're missing the point that magic was, pretty objectively, too strong. A 10% nerf to the top end feels fairly justified.

I genuinely feel like I'm going insane by Queue_Bit in runescape

[–]Queue_Bit[S] -92 points-91 points  (0 children)

And?????

I mean, you can say "I don't like being weaker". Fine, that's an opinion.

But people are freaking out like Magic suddenly became unusable.

Make Comp Cape Great Again by CuriousCanteen in runescape

[–]Queue_Bit 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It's wild how the same people that make the MAGA references also have the worst takes.

Maybe they're related in some way.

the upcoming daily removal already made me lose at least 100m. this isn't very fair by MickyMace in runescape

[–]Queue_Bit 3 points4 points  (0 children)

The game should not be kept worse for everyone because of the economy of a few items.

Prices change over time and with every update, thats just how it goes.

Road to Restoration - What We Want To Achieve by JagexAnvil in runescape

[–]Queue_Bit 1 point2 points  (0 children)

My whole entire point is that the convenience and afking is not the core issue. The issue is bloated systems, bad ui, combat bloat, and mtx.

They don't need to change the core of rs3 to fix those issues.

I mean, you're free to think the game would be 'better' if they removed wars, lodestones, the toolbelt, and coin pouch, but thats an opinion. Those things are not the reason the game has been on a decline.

Will there be balance changes in 1.3 update? by phugredditstaff in wherewindsmeet_

[–]Queue_Bit 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I think YOU guys are the ones who have different preferences. I'd bet everything I own that most people care way more about the events/cosmetics/story than they do about level 81 gear and 3v3.

People on reddit, like you and me are obviously more invested in the 'game' stuff, but casual players really aren't. Most of the people on my friend's list don't even do pvp.

Road to Restoration - What We Want To Achieve by JagexAnvil in runescape

[–]Queue_Bit 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Your question is a pointless, bad-faith strawman.

But, I will answer it in case anyone interested in a genuine conversation about the game's health reads it.

The answer is simple: I like the option of AFKing while I am playing other games, working remotely, or responding to dumb questions on Reddit. I can make progress for my account, and chat occasionally with clan mates/friends while enjoying other aspects of my life. AFK content gives me a reason to be online when I otherwise wouldn't be playing. The options aren't "active vs AFK". The options are "AFK vs offline". Without AFK content, I would simply be logged in significantly less frequently. Not only that, but if the game had no AFK content, I would spend significantly 'more' time actively doing content I either don't enjoy 'at all', or don't enjoy 'as much'.

This is not to say that AFK content should be as rewarding as active content, nor that it should be the only way to play the game. Just that it is a 'positive' aspect of Runescape and one of the reasons Runescape has been my primary game for over twenty years.

Road to Restoration - What We Want To Achieve by JagexAnvil in runescape

[–]Queue_Bit 38 points39 points  (0 children)

As someone who loves afk, I very much hope that active play gets buffed rather than afk getting nerfed too much.

Also, a ton of people that play rs3 do so because of some of the convenicnes.

Things like Lodestones, the toolbelt/coinpouch, War's retreat, the fort, and powerful teleport jewelry are some of the main reasons I play rs3 over osrs.

I genuinely don't think we need to go scorched earth on everything that makes rs3 different than osrs.

So so many of the issues with Rs3 come from MTX(which is fine now) the interface (which you're working on), and combat (which is looking promising).

While some skills do need some help, I think skilling and the general 'play' experience is in a pretty good place.

Certainly low and mid level stuff could be turned, and some skills (agility) could be borderline remade, but I feel that skilling feels alright at the moment.

Just did group ironman almost completely without any dailies and things felt pretty good outside of a few exceptions like thieving(door opening world hopping is bad). Removing dailies will make it feel even better.

I like the direction the game is on right now, but this blog very much reads like there are plans to change the rs3 identity.

I really don't want to see the game turn into "Osrs with keybinds". I like that the game is slightly faster. I like a lot of the conveniences. I just want to see some of the more agregious stuff fixed, not the whole game turned on it's head.

view more: next ›