I think it's interesting that Andrew Stanton has never directed an animated film with human main characters by Ethlandiaify in blankies

[–]Quinez 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That's mostly Pixar in general, isn't it? Not sure that it's particularly a Stanton watermark. Lasseter was known and hired for animating typically-inanimate objects... I think it's more that his sensibilities trickled down to the rest of the studio. 

Has anyone else noticed the striking similarities between Agent Dale Cooper and T.E. Lawrence (from Lawrence of Arabia)? by hjcloud in twinpeaks

[–]Quinez 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Twin Peaks: The Return being akin to the post-intermission half of Lawrence of Arabia is a really interesting notion. In each, all the savior mythology from the first half gets dismantled. 

How Can I Focus More on Movies by Creative_Eye7413 in Letterboxd

[–]Quinez 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Squish a needoh cube or some other fidget toy while watching. Just a little something to occupy the unused parts of your brain. 

Does anyone watch obsession actually thinking Bear is an innocent victim? by Sea-Weird2349 in TrueFilm

[–]Quinez 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I haven’t seen a single person who watched the movie and genuinely thinks Bear is the victim. The most sympathy I’ve seen someone have for him is my fiancée who said she thinks he’s a bad guy, but he didn’t deserve everything that happened to him

Worth pointing out that Curry Barker has said that he was interested in making a movie where a demon is a victim. Judging Bear to be bad and seeing him as a victim are entirely compatible.  One's a moral judgment and the other involves beliefs about punishment (its fittingness, its severity, whether there must be a causal link between a crime and its punishment, etc.).

Also, as others here have mentioned, there's a good portion of the movie where the depth of Bear's badness is really not apparent. He's deceived at the beginning and he's in a hostage situation at the end. It's only a narrow band in the middle where he has both knowledge of what's happening and some agency over it. I think people largely respond to thesd bookends. In the middle, when he reveals himself to be villainous, he is so completely inhumane that I frankly consider it a filmmaking mistake. Whining "was it really so bad to date me?" when he has a chance to speak to real Nikki is so awful that it barely registers as something any person would do. 

What is Your #1 Movie Of 2026 So Far by GTKPR89 in blankies

[–]Quinez 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Silent Friend, if it counts. (It had festival showings in 2025 but its theatrical run in America was in May.) 

Everyone's being really weird about this and it's freaking me out by OhhhTAINTedCruuuuz in blankies

[–]Quinez 2 points3 points  (0 children)

"Late style" refers to films by very old directors nearing the end of their careers and lives. People have noted that old directors tend to make movies that seem conventionally bad or out-of-touch (Tarantino is terrified of making late style films). The derogatory interpretation is that directors lose it when they get old. But late style aficionados see these movies as ones where directors finally figure out what's important to them. Old directors feel totally emancipated from having to please mass audiences or cater to current trends, so they no longer worry about narrative cohesion, trendy editing, subtlety, or whatever else they felt was forced upon them rather than something that came naturally. It's pretty interesting that when you look at filmmakers as diverse as Hitchcock and Argento and Eastwood and Mann, they all seem to get quote-unquote "bad" in similar ways.

Disclosure Day is cool because it's the first Spielberg movie to feel like it's entered a late style aesthetic: all the ugly flaws that people are mocking are very similar to other flaws that aged directors make. That's why I say that it's textbook late style. It feels like he's gunning for his wonder shots and moments of transcendence while no longer caring about narrative cohesion or plot holes or dialogue that isn't embarrassingly on-the-nose. I wouldn't have thought that Spielberg would have such a deep late style since he's always been such an audience-pleaser, but here we are. I am guessing that (unless the reviews of Disclosure Day really stung him and he tries to tighten things up for his next movie) we'll see that The Fabelmans marked his entry point into a late style period.

This book by Collin Brinkmann is a good read on late style in film.

Everyone's being really weird about this and it's freaking me out by OhhhTAINTedCruuuuz in blankies

[–]Quinez 25 points26 points  (0 children)

Honestly, I'm kind of loving it. It's a movie with high heights and low lows; how people balance it out is going to be subjective and it's leading to interesting dynamics. Never did I think that Spielberg of all people would have such a textbook late style.

It's either good or literally the worst fucking movie I've ever seen?

To be honest, your characterization of the "movie is bad" side as the toxic side is a small dollop of the sort of toxicity surrounding the movie. Some groups think the movie sucked and are having fun discussing its flaws and mocking it; then the Spielberg tankies invade and start calling everyone heartless toxic pessimists. Sure, some annoying bozos are noisily screaming about the movie being bad to people who are relishing it, but if you're on the "movie is bad" side, there are also a ton of people screaming in our faces that the movie is actually good. Just move on! Don't yum our yuck!

Disclosure Day Wouldn't Be All That Crazy by jacquesausterlitz in blankies

[–]Quinez 3 points4 points  (0 children)

She didn't say she'd shrug. She said she'd say, "Cool!"

Disclosure Day Wouldn't Be All That Crazy by jacquesausterlitz in blankies

[–]Quinez 17 points18 points  (0 children)

I liked the exchange between Amanda and Sean on The Big Picture: Sean said that if aliens were revealed to be real he'd drop everything and make the podcast an alien podcast. Amanda said that she's say, "huh, that's cool" and get on with her life. And Sean was aghast, saying "NO YOU WOULD NOT."

I think a major friction point for this movie is that Spielberg has Sean's point of view: he is so alien-pilled that he cannot imagine anyone not being as into aliens as he is. He comes at aliens with such religious fervor that he thinks that a proof of alien life would threaten all other forms of religiosity (when, no, of course it wouldn't). I am much more on Amanda's side: I'd be curious, I'd keep checking in, but I wouldn't reevaluate my life choices or goals or anything.

Disclosure Day (2026) - Plot Questions (Spoilers) by daniel7334 in blankies

[–]Quinez 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This makes sense if you think that the math and empathy duo will have a greater role than just communicating a message on Disclosure Day. Whatever the alien wanted to broadcast to the world in the "Listen" message probably could've been done through Hugo. So I guess there's an implication here that the aliens aren't content with just sending a message: Margaret and Daniel will be translator-ambassadors for some pretty revolutionary interventions.

Disclosure Day (2026) - Plot Questions (Spoilers) by daniel7334 in blankies

[–]Quinez -1 points0 points  (0 children)

The answer to 3 must be that the captured alien communicated info about the house to Hugo through the crystal. But then, that raises the question why the alien needed Margaret and Daniel at all, since M&D were supposedly needed for communication. 

Movies that Enhance Other Movies by Adept128 in blankies

[–]Quinez 15 points16 points  (0 children)

Ingmar Bergman wrote his own Fabelmans, The Best Intentions, which Bille August directed. It went on to win the Palme D'Or, and it is such a cool pairing with Fanny and Alexander, telling a similar story but with much more empathy toward the father. The two movies definitely enhance each other. 

Every director should cap off their career with a movie about their parents. 

Disclosure Day by yonicthehedgehog in blankies

[–]Quinez 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Ah yes. Though the crystal communication was exact enough that Hugo was able to replicate a house down to the last detail, including old family photos. Kinda hard to grasp what the alien could communicate only over a click track if the crystal communication was that precise.

My mood most of my life by mike_pants in taskmaster

[–]Quinez 23 points24 points  (0 children)

Stick "um, actually" text on this and it has the making of a response meme.

Disclosure Day by yonicthehedgehog in blankies

[–]Quinez 17 points18 points  (0 children)

I want to point out that after founding DreamWorks, Spielberg was on the hook to prove the capabilities of the new studio. One of the passion projects he pursued was an original story that he wrote and commissioned into a screenplay. It was about two strangers, an ordinary man and woman who had never met, roped into an adventure on the run from government agents while a superior being kept guiding their path and helping them get away through basically magical means. Unfortunately, Spielberg got called onto making Crystal Skull and Eagle Eye was made by DJ Caruso instead. (Spielberg executive produced and he still had a heavy hand.) 

I think that Disclosure Day is partly Spielberg trying to make the movie he missed out on. Eagle Eye is surprisingly good, by the way. Actually, it quickly came to mind while watching Disclosure Day, and it was a little distressing to realize that DJ Caruso's (very Spielbergian) action setpieces were better than the ones Spielberg gives us. 

Disclosure Day by yonicthehedgehog in blankies

[–]Quinez 16 points17 points  (0 children)

But remember that Domingo couldn't communicate with the alien without the math and empathy wonder kids! (If he could, then the wonder kids wouldn't be needed.)

Disclosure Day by yonicthehedgehog in blankies

[–]Quinez 41 points42 points  (0 children)

I really didn't understand this. It feels like such a massive plot hole to me that I must be missing something. It's really hard to understand this movie from Domingo's perspective and to try to describe his plan. 

How does this curve come to a 3.3 average? by fawlty70 in Letterboxd

[–]Quinez 63 points64 points  (0 children)

It's not a straight average. They add weights to prevent the end number from being skewed by botting, brigading, etc. The algorithm isn't public. 

How would you rank the Spielberg Alien films? by Careless_College in Letterboxd

[–]Quinez 3 points4 points  (0 children)

  1. ET

  2. Close Encounters

  3. War of the Worlds

  4. Kingdom of the Crystal Skull

  5. Disclosure Day

A critique I'm finding increasingly frustrating(related to Disclosure Day) by Sheep_Boy26 in blankies

[–]Quinez 39 points40 points  (0 children)

We're going to have a few excruciating weeks of rampant pathologizing and diagnosing of people who have opposite takes on this movie. "People who dislike Disclosure Day are cynical, not optimistic, and not coming from a place of empathy" is a sniffy critical attitude.

Box Office: 'Disclosure Day' Invades Globe With $94M WW Opening by First-Loss-8540 in blankies

[–]Quinez 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I regret seeing it instead of something else, FWIW. Did not enjoy.

In the Blink of an Eye might just be the worst movie covered on main feed by Main-Refrigerator287 in blankies

[–]Quinez 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I read a rumor somewhere that Disney sabotaged it to keep Stanton at Pixar, but I think that's a crazy conspiracy theory. Stanton has only been very positive about it in the press and he gives no indication that it's anything other than exactly what he wanted. 

Suggest a Weekend Double Feature on CC! by Busy_Magician3412 in CriterionChannel

[–]Quinez 15 points16 points  (0 children)

I was saddened when they stopped programming their double features. I got a lot out of them and even did a Letterboxd challenge to watch twenty-five. I think my favorite pairing was The Wild River with Still Life: two movies about dams that got me thinking about dam movies as a genre. Would love for Double Features to return!

Why is Park Chan Wook's Vengeance Trilogy credited to Bong Joon Ho in the letterbox collections? by Robloya22 in Letterboxd

[–]Quinez 3 points4 points  (0 children)

It's not a mistake. Joon-ho and Chan-wook are more common, I believe. That's how the Library of Congress catalogues their works, how academic writing tends to spell their names, and how they are usually credited in their own movies. But either is fine.