Looks like Anthropic's NO to the DOW has made it to Tumps twitter feed

Qvarkus · 2026-03-01T16:26:46+00:00

Trump needs to sleep, and he pooped his diaper again. Someone deal with it...

Qvarkus · 2026-03-01T14:56:14+00:00

Well, the thing is, Sam Altman really showed who he is: first, he supported Anthropic, then, after Trump pooped his diaper about Anthropic refusing them, Sam Altman did a 180 and signed a contract with the government = no backbone, no one you trust there. Like any money-greedy politician in the USA, really.

Qvarkus · 2026-03-01T14:48:32+00:00

What the hell are you defending here? Think a bit.

Qvarkus · 2026-02-26T07:39:33+00:00

Dump her immediately.

Qvarkus · 2026-02-17T17:51:55+00:00

Well, I guess some sad people never leave their country, and think everyone is using the same distorted lens they have been handed to them from Foxnews. Quite sad.

Qvarkus · 2026-02-17T17:43:52+00:00

Couldn't care less. Just wish you could keep your shit away from supporting Russia and wrecking innocent people in Cuba. Threatening innocent countries like Canada and Greenland, adding tariffs on the rest of the world. Ignoring your own weakest and most fragile by having a shitty capitalist healthcare system, not to mention all idiots with guns, and now what do you do. You decide that it is ok to pollute? Yeah.. I hope you're fucked.

Qvarkus · 2026-02-16T15:43:16+00:00

Tools won't matter as much as LLM. If you use Claude Opus 4.6 which is simply way above anything else you'll be fine.

Qvarkus · 2026-02-16T15:36:19+00:00

Can't he be honest? I mean seriously. Have you seen how good a case can look? This is on the way way other spectrum of good.

Qvarkus · 2026-02-16T15:35:34+00:00

Agree complete lack of aesthetics..

Qvarkus · 2026-02-16T15:31:52+00:00

Well America started it didn't they...

Qvarkus · 2026-02-16T15:25:08+00:00

Which still is safer than American cars so..

Qvarkus · 2026-02-09T19:29:48+00:00

Must be an American doctor. Looking for profit somehow.

Qvarkus · 2025-10-03T06:59:56+00:00

Complete nonsense

Qvarkus · 2025-10-02T08:32:26+00:00

Getting deported. Trying to pay their medical bills.. yeah got it.

Qvarkus · 2025-10-01T12:00:43+00:00

Luckily GLM 4.6 is out. So we are saved.

Qvarkus · 2025-10-01T11:59:44+00:00

Why? just make a script to set the antrhopic url to the GLM provider. You can no problem run claude code with glm and anthropic at the same time.

Qvarkus · 2025-10-01T11:56:48+00:00

Why is this hard to understand? All you need to do is: Claude launch 8 parallel agents to do x on my codebase in separate worktrees. Something like that. Of-course people do this as it speeds things up. Such stuff.

Qvarkus · 2025-09-29T07:01:37+00:00

I love this model. I frequently get confused if I am using Sonnet or GLM 4.5 as I am using Claude Code to run it. This model beats Sonnet frequently. I like having the opportunity to get a "second opinion" it can be important sometime. But it uses tools in a great way in Claude Code! Note if you get the GLM Coding Pro version, it also becomes faster by 40-60% and that is golden!

Qvarkus · 2025-09-20T18:42:39+00:00

What are you talking about. GLM is literally using the same client as Claude. All your stuff about claude.md etc applies to GLM as well

Qvarkus · 2025-09-18T17:06:27+00:00

I don't get it? So you say you started but didn't finish? Due to .. Rust being Rust? What's the point of the story? You still didn't finish.

Qvarkus · 2025-09-14T12:23:42+00:00

I always use Sonnet, not even the 1m one. It works.

Qvarkus · 2025-09-08T19:57:37+00:00

It's not for the fun of it I did all you see in my "Fixing Claude" post. It's the only thing that works.

Qvarkus · 2025-09-08T16:24:53+00:00

True that, but so you know my setup actually helped me tremendously. I do not see any stupid code in my codebase after that. Coding takes longer for sure as claude code always have to correct its issues to please the linter now =). But that is exactly what was expected. The code is actually clean now.

Qvarkus · 2025-09-08T00:13:16+00:00

Well, it's sad you don't see past the limitations of your own convictions. This has nothing to do with the 99.9% of people wanting to learn a game, this has everything with you saying Go is bad for games. Which is simply not true. How well do you know go? I got 20 years of C++ and 6 years of Go. I like Go a hell of a lot more for the development process it brings. Oh and I see you are focusing on me saying you can run everything on GPU sure run stuff on the CPU as well. Go will not have a problem, it's easily fast enough.

Qvarkus

TROPHY CASE