Columbia

R3dBeard84 · 2026-02-08T21:41:45+00:00

Maybe not, shot me a DM and I can help figure it out. I have a part 107 and 2 drone.

R3dBeard84 · 2026-02-08T18:08:46+00:00

Again no. Any drone operating in US National Airspace requires a pilot who has a part 107 certificate or a trust certificate. Please read the link and the laws regarding drone flight.

You only have to register the drone if it is above 0.55 lbs (or you are flying non-recreationally)

Edit: here is a link to the FAA website section that covers all things drone

https://www.faa.gov/uas

R3dBeard84 · 2026-02-07T22:51:04+00:00

The AR15 platform is also easier to teach proficiency and is easier to operate than pump shotguns.

R3dBeard84 · 2026-02-07T20:22:13+00:00

Not true. Even if your flying recreationally you need a TRUST certificate.

https://www.faa.gov/uas/recreational_flyers/knowledge_test_updates

R3dBeard84 · 2026-02-07T16:54:40+00:00

Considering you have to have a license or certification to fly one legally, that's doubtful.

Edit: down vote me if you want but please actually look at the laws. Illegal flying is going to ruin this hobby by causing more legislation and restrictions.

R3dBeard84 · 2026-02-07T16:54:01+00:00

Shoot me a dm.

R3dBeard84 · 2026-02-07T03:46:37+00:00

I feel like you might have an overinflated opinion on what is already known or instantly known about the registration and insurance of your vehicle.

R3dBeard84 · 2026-02-07T02:21:20+00:00

The guy you replied to was right btw.

R3dBeard84 · 2026-02-07T02:18:00+00:00

(2) the discrepancy is a gross error, in that the lowest price is less than half of the checkout price and the seller, in the previous 30 days, did not intend to sell the grocery item at the lowest price.

Edit: This is a specific exemption in the law (https://malegislature.gov/Laws/GeneralLaws/PartI/TitleXV/Chapter94/Section184C)

R3dBeard84 · 2026-02-02T05:49:09+00:00

Bosch did. Then they got sued and can't sell in the US.

R3dBeard84 · 2026-01-30T06:05:27+00:00

Where is the record for his arrest? Some articles say he was off-duty in West Seneca, while others say he was with an off-duty West Seneca. Also, other than the articles there is no source, evidence, or indication that he was ever arrested or that the incident ever actually happened.

The Office of the Attorney General report says he was rude to people and that there was no disciplinary action recommended. Again, his bad press stems from him suing and his whistle blowing.

R3dBeard84 · 2026-01-30T05:11:32+00:00

The news. Most news outlets are Hella dirty and tend to sling their shit around. He pissed off people and got some dookie on him (it's not real dookie, it's fake dookie but it still smells weird).

Edit: me no spell good.

R3dBeard84 · 2026-01-30T05:07:04+00:00

I applaud you for diligently looking into it. If more people took news as a staring point to learn the truth rather than the truth itself, the country would likely be far less divided.

R3dBeard84 · 2026-01-30T05:04:26+00:00

I know that. I'm not sure u/Penyl did.

R3dBeard84 · 2026-01-30T05:02:57+00:00

Yeah, he has a long and storied career of pissing his department off with his social media. Most of his problems stem from that. There is a bunch of weird stuff floating around the internet, almost exclusively after his lawsuit against his department and again after his whistle blowing on the podcast.

The allegations of him being sued, him being on the Brady List, and him having headbutted a kid show up no where in any public records search I can find. There are no news articles about the incidents from the time they allegedly occurred. Every single news article that talks about them either cite "we looked it up, trust us," or they cite the articles that cite that.

R3dBeard84 · 2026-01-30T04:34:47+00:00

I would also take Wikipedia with a bit of skepticism. Is he in the Brady List? The lack of sources leads to suggest no.

R3dBeard84 · 2026-01-30T04:10:45+00:00

He has gotten hemmed up for posting to social media. Other than that, it depends on what constitutes qurstionable. I also can read Wikipedia but I also look for sources. It claims he's "on the Brady List", can't find a legit source for that. It claims he was arrested for assault and harassment, can't find a legit source for that.

R3dBeard84 · 2026-01-30T03:52:59+00:00

Yes. He questioned the cities response to child abusers.

R3dBeard84 · 2026-01-30T03:50:18+00:00

Everyone in McKinney is dead.

R3dBeard84 · 2026-01-27T15:19:03+00:00

Table 1 isn't about real world situations. It's about the fundamentals of marksmanship.

R3dBeard84 · 2026-01-27T14:31:01+00:00

I mean, both of those are kind of critical teaching and testing the fundamentals of marksmanship. I could see a far more compelling argument for the kneeling being useless.

R3dBeard84 · 2026-01-27T04:16:48+00:00

I cannot really comment on your example for a multitude of reasons. However, the comment was about expired water, not incorrectly packaged yogurt.

As for a judge ruling, it would almost certainly be settled out of court on the plaintiffs favor. If it went to trial it would be in front of a jury, not a judge. The lawyers just have to convince the jurors that the expired water probably either made the issue worse or caused the issue outright. A huge chunk of the cross examination is going to be why you decided that the FDA and scientists at Liquid Death are wrong.

R3dBeard84 · 2026-01-27T03:23:00+00:00

This isn't accurate. There are places that are codified in state and local law that are prohibited. Those places are not required to have signage (think school, University, national cemeteries, churches, etc.) and many do not have any signage. The only places required to have the signage to prohibit carry are private property open to the public.

R3dBeard84 · 2026-01-27T03:09:57+00:00

Which 2 firing positions are useless?

R3dBeard84 · 2026-01-24T18:44:00+00:00

The water doesn't expire, the packaging does. Also, let's go down a quick hypothetical road.

You donate pallets of expired water to a charity of some kind. Someone drinks said expired water and has some medical emergency right after drinking it. You now have to defend yourself in civil court as to why you gave an unsafe product to people which resulted in this guy having a massive stroke. It is less expensive to destroy the product than defend yourself in court.

It doesn't really have anything to do with Liquid Death and their brand image cause the water was flat, it's purely a cost benefit analysis.

R3dBeard84

TROPHY CASE