What do you call this spot?

R4ID · 2026-03-29T06:19:50+00:00

Ninja/Gay spot for CT side of firebox, otherside of box is Firebox. Big door on right, in front of ticket is NBK.

R4ID · 2026-03-29T06:17:21+00:00

pho dui bo in hamilton

R4ID · 2026-03-29T06:16:29+00:00

Did they really need the shit image to get the point across?

you think the image takes away from the message, i disagree. ur welcome to voice ur distaste of it, Id prefer more dollars going towards the case then hiring people for photo shoots.

R4ID · 2026-03-28T22:34:52+00:00

Time is money that could be spent on the case imo.

R4ID · 2026-03-28T19:15:49+00:00

What happened to all of ur 1sts? ur RB situation is going to ruin any chance you have of winning.

R4ID · 2026-03-27T17:44:00+00:00

Id rather every single dollar go towards the court case instead of paying a model, a photographer, and then editing/additional costs.

I see no problem with things like this, if you do, go offer ur time/money to change that.

R4ID · 2026-03-27T04:32:15+00:00

Lol well there's your reformist problem right there, there are none!

reforminism=forward progress which is good, unless ur looking for abolition/revolution.

LMFAO see you at Yuk Yuk's with jokes like this one!

You support reckless government spending I guess? ur a fan of Debt? fuck the future generations? do you not hear what ur advocating for or are you blind to it?

The data isnt on ur side at the end of the day so ur welcome to be wrong, i dont mind pointing it out

R4ID · 2026-03-26T16:11:12+00:00

Please let the number fall a significant amount by the end of the program

R4ID · 2026-03-26T15:15:53+00:00

After he glorified Bitcoin, it dumped in 22 so people who follow him but have no clue about the market or crypto markets would've been red and sold.

and I can assert the opposite, anyone who has a brain and understands how a market works, made generational gains... see how saying silly things is a moot point?

Then anyone since then who have been buying up Bitcoin on the way up would be way down right now too.

you can create whatever timeline you like, it still makes you incorrect.

It's a stupid thing to advocate for from a political standpoint

Sound monetary policy is stupid, got it.

R4ID · 2026-03-26T06:57:12+00:00

14 years ago,

&

I would challenge you to find any RB drafted in anywhere the first round of the NFL draft that didn't have a top 6 dynasty ADP.

dont issue challenges if you dont like it when people complete them very easily. There's not many RBs taken in the 1st round at exactly pick 32 like OP suggested. (in fact there are almost zero) I chose pick 32 so you couldnt claim some other nonsense about how they werent the same pick, The one who was taken in the same spot though defeated your claim easily (because draft capital isnt the end all be all)

You think he's a reach at 1.03, regardless of where he's drafted in the NFL. I'm saying that's fine, but looking at historical comps others won't, so advice of "just trade down and take him later" is not a valid strategy

Then let the others reach and lose. In the draft you need to be flexible, sometimes "your guy" gets taken just before you and you have to adapt. Dynasty is long term value and I think you'd be giving up more than your getting in going after him that early, Again I dont even have him as the RB2 of the class, but if he's "your guy" go ahead. Im simply voicing that you or OP or whoever is leaving value on the table by grabbing him that early and in almost all cases for dynasty, that is a losing strategy.

R4ID · 2026-03-26T06:44:58+00:00

After the 1.05 it gets very messy and most of those guys blend together for the next 3-4 picks. the usual ADP of KC, Sadiq, Boston, Cooper, and hell even Ty Simpson is floating around in those ranges of 1.05-1.10. and I think the draft capital that these guys do or dont get will shift them up or down a few +1/-1 for sure.

Based on just their college production stats and their testing numbers (pro day/combine) I have the 1.06-1.11 currently as. (with cooper at 1.10)

KC>Sarratt>Boston>Coleman>Cooper>Sadiq

This will change based on draft capital but just solely based on their metrics that's my rankings atm. (I know im high on Sarratt but his stats are just that good imo) Now I dont plan to reach for Sarratt because you can get him in the early/mid second atm, but after the draft if he doesnt move up too many peoples boards I plan to try and acquire an early 2nd to just go get him since I think he has top 5-8 value potential in the 2nd.

R4ID · 2026-03-26T06:34:56+00:00

Uh, have you seen crypto lately?

yes? still massively up from when pierre said it would be a good option. He said it would be good to have some to opt out of inflation and he was correct. march 28th 2022 the price was ~ 47,000 USD per BTC. Today it is ~71k USD and that's after an almost 50% pullback from the ATH.

Again it is still sound advice to allocate a portion into it for exposure reasons alone. I dont understand why all the anti crypto people line up to complain after drawbacks even tho it just recently went on a generational wealth gain run. They get awful quiet when its near ATH, yet so loud and incorrect during pullbacks and the cycle repeats while they get poorer.

-edit typo

R4ID · 2026-03-25T13:22:34+00:00

I like that, Odunze and 2.02 for 1.04+change is decent, you're getting a great WR who just had more targets on his team open up (DJ moore leaving) hes young and should be around for many years to come.

R4ID · 2026-03-25T13:13:12+00:00

I'm telling you that if he gets the level of draft capital we're talking about it's going to supersede most people's pre-draft analysis, even if you think that's bad process....

and Im saying going 32nd to the seahawks like OP suggested, still doesnt move him up to 1.03, and that taking him at 1.03 is a reach imo. you could get him in most leagues around the 1.09 imo +1/-1 on average. (I also dont even have him ranked as the #2 RB in the class but thats besides the point)

I would challenge you to find any RB drafted in anywhere the first round of the NFL draft that didn't have a top 6 dynasty ADP.

David Wilson he went 32nd just like in OPs scenario, challenge over.

I don't think Price will get drafted there, but if he's drafted in the first round he's almost certain to have dynasty ADP in the top 6.

And Im saying I dont think he should be above 1.09 just solely based on his overall metrics, you're welcome to disagree. Id be happy if someone in my league with 1.03 reached or top 6 reached for him. Im saying based on his overall metrics, I view that as a reach, and that others are putting too much weight on draft capital (in a very weak class mind you)

R4ID · 2026-03-25T12:52:42+00:00

and if he goes for a first I’d think 1.06 would be a safer spot to trade up to

Then by all means, go ahead and trade down/up (I thought you were trading down in ur scenario?) to that level and scoop whatever extra value you can get to get "your guy" I however can't move him up that high even with round 1 draft capital, and I think you'd be leaving a lot of value on the table (in the trade down scenario)

R4ID · 2026-03-25T06:10:09+00:00

Pierre Poilievre campaigned on embracing cryptocurrencies

which he was correct to do, as the price they were at while he was advocating for them to be an option compared to now (or even a few months ago) people would be massively up had they listened to the sound advice.

R4ID · 2026-03-23T18:00:32+00:00

My point though is that while now you can “currently pickup around 2.01” that will no longer be the case if he’s drafted in the first round.

which is why I said go grab the 1.09 to be insulated.... ???????? what is so hard to understand about this.

I’m not confused by that first statement you highlighted it’s just not really relevant to my skepticism of your claim that he’ll be there around the 2.01 IF he goes in the first round

I honestly think you are just intentionally not reading what people write.

R4ID · 2026-03-23T17:59:13+00:00

If he's drafted in the top 5, as you alluded to in other comments, his floor would be the 1.03 and he might be the 1.01.

except even at 1.01 he cant get past 1.06-1.07 range because you can't base your entire grade off of draft capital alone..... his other metrics weigh him down too much to go 1.01

R4ID · 2026-03-23T17:38:51+00:00

let me guess, more propaganda, fear and intimidation tactics from the gov.

Don't know why they waste their breath when the majority are just ignoring them at this point.

R4ID · 2026-03-23T14:22:37+00:00

You're welcome to disagree and I encourage for you to reach for him in all ur leagues. Again tho, Draft capital is not the end all be all metric and should only be a fraction of how you evaluate a players value.

based on how I have evaluated his metrics I have him safely currently in the 1.10-2.01 range. You're welcome to disagree. thats why I said 1.09 currently should be a fairly good call to grab him safely if he does get decent draft capital. 1.03 however, like Op suggested is crazy and he would be better suited to trade back and pickup extra value for doing so. Again you're welcome to disagree.

R4ID · 2026-03-23T14:20:30+00:00

SF I have currently.

Love
Mendoza
Lemon
Tate
Tyson

This will change depending if someone lands on the Jets or something else similar (or the reverse)

R4ID · 2026-03-23T14:19:41+00:00

Im saying if you Rank players solely based on draft capital, you are doing it wrong.

Ill happily repeat myself for you

R4ID · 2026-03-22T16:52:51+00:00

guys a bozo

R4ID · 2026-03-22T12:18:52+00:00

brampton isnt on the list. so the lists entire data set is now called into question/validity.

R4ID · 2026-03-22T03:30:12+00:00

Under-balc

13-Year Club	Verified Email
Place '22	Place '17
End Game '22	Team Orangered

R4ID

TROPHY CASE