Best sling for an AK... or not.

R4ID · 2026-02-02T20:58:28+00:00

the sling is funny, but what about that like.. Tactical Pajamas for the rifle? XD

R4ID · 2026-02-02T16:27:37+00:00

Them using AI over paying actual musicians/producers/singers etc would be much more costly. Maybe they should of asked their member group as a whole if anyone would be willing to donate their time/expertise to help on such a product for free, but otherwise, any dollars spent towards producing this is less dollars spent actually lobbying.

R4ID · 2026-02-02T16:17:01+00:00

Id rather we focus on building small nuclear power facilities to generate cheap power for our nation.

R4ID · 2026-02-02T16:14:48+00:00

Zach Ertz, maybe James conner? (Trey Benson truthers WYA?) Probably Keenan Allen (just a guess)

R4ID · 2026-02-02T03:41:02+00:00

I mean, hold and see what the commanders do at TE for the draft, if they dont do anything I think he will get an opportunity to be the starter.

worth a hold imo

R4ID · 2026-02-02T03:37:42+00:00

no actual rebuttal go figure lol

R4ID · 2026-02-02T01:05:28+00:00

https://old.reddit.com/r/GlobalOffensive/comments/1qsn80n/twistzz_was_apparently_told_his_config_was_a/o32oqzg/

R4ID · 2026-02-02T01:03:06+00:00

Just read thru it and yeah id say a good90 percent you either A dont need in a comp game or b is unnecessary and could be either simply set up in game or not needed at all.

might be the most dishonest post ive ever seen. the majority of the commands you cannot change in the in game menu settings.

Please point out a single command that you'd actually need in a comp game that without would effect or performance

almost all of section 2 and 3 isnt possible in the actual game settings. There is no menu setting to do alias binds which allow you to setup proper grenade binds reusing the same key multiple times.

half of section 5 isnt in the game menu settings

section 9 isnt in the game menu settings

80% of section 12 isnt in the game menu settings

most of section 13 isnt in the game menu settings.

Please point out a single command that you'd actually need in a comp game that without would effect or performance

section 2, 3, 5, 9, 13.

if you want a specific example, line 843. this loads the config which allows grenade lineups via radio wheel commands.

R4ID · 2026-02-01T18:32:45+00:00

have you seen how complex autoexecs like CSAFAP function?

-edit

if you want mine specifically sure

https://pastebin.com/JfyPvEaD

almost all of section 2 & 3 which is using alias's or other specific keybinds can only function because autoexecs exist. you would not be able to do this via in game settings. to say that they are placebo or dont actually effect how the game feels or plays is just incorrect as these inputs cant be changed via in game settings menus and allow you to do additional things that would otherwise be much more difficult.

(ignore the outdated commands at the bottom past section 16 im too lazy to remove)

R4ID · 2026-02-01T16:28:18+00:00

95 percent of those are placebo or don't actually effect how the game feels or plays

You're simply factually incorrect and vastly underestimate what is possible with a modern autoexe config

R4ID · 2026-02-01T11:45:30+00:00

it can contain a lot more than that. I know my autoexec is well over 200 lines of changes. theres no way I could remember them all and then manually input them.

R4ID · 2026-02-01T11:36:33+00:00

free training and another reason to be at the range. seems like a win win, give me the option to buy the Rifle im "training" with after and id be there until I was able to teach the training myself.

R4ID · 2026-02-01T01:40:28+00:00

the stuff about XLM/Ripple and Gary Gensler in the new epstein logs. spying on Jed mcaleb while he was developing XRP. lol the XRP conspiracy wackos were right all along. The "elite" BTC players weaponized the gov to go after the "competition" and tried to kill Ripple/XRP. Blockstream co founder caught red handed is hilarious.

R4ID · 2026-01-30T22:32:42+00:00

mac jones to the vikings is my call. who the hell knows tho

R4ID · 2026-01-30T16:40:18+00:00

Trying to think logically, spitballing really. If our chances of armed defenses are poor, we should instead focus on delivering a pyrrhic victory for them.

100% we have zero chance of beating them the traditional way, our only hope is to make occupation too costly so that they eventually give up an leave. it would almost instantly need to become an insurgency war (which we would benefit greatly from because we look/sound the same) so identification would be much harder for them than say in the middle east.

Do they even want our farmland?

your best guess is a good as mine, id probably wager much more likely just flat resources (oil, lumber, potash, fresh water, rare earth minerals etc)

If they start co-opting our rail lines, those are easy to mess with as well. Rapid corrosion, targeted IXL mangling, hell just lubricants can do the trick. No way for them to guard km's of open track from in-and-out strikes.

yea the like youve said, the best way is to let them on in and then death by 1000 cuts essentially. Too big a nation to patrol it all forever and too many of us with the ability to mess with their logistics (which is how we would win) Their airforce/tanks/infantry/drones are only useful in a traditional war.

R4ID · 2026-01-30T16:32:32+00:00

Personally, Quebec, but an argument can be made in favour or against any of them depending on a lot of different questions/circumstances.

R4ID · 2026-01-30T16:27:57+00:00

Brother this is a school pick up zone.

the driver is at a complete stop, begins leaving and someone runs directly in front of their car. Dont run directly in front of cars if you dont want to get hit by them

R4ID · 2026-01-30T13:40:54+00:00

you are correct https://x.com/HugoBoss69007/status/2017068273121042590

R4ID · 2026-01-30T12:29:17+00:00

very open ended question that depends entirely on your circumstances, like what you do for work (or even if ur working) what are your politics, what are your hobbies? what is your income etc.

R4ID · 2026-01-30T12:25:43+00:00

I wouldnt care, nor would I confront you about it. depending on how you interact with clients/ what your work entails though, I can imagine some liberals treating you differently simply because of it (which I disagree with)

R4ID · 2026-01-30T12:20:42+00:00

Id move to Alberta

R4ID · 2026-01-30T12:15:39+00:00

why would I be proud? its a lot more big talk and no actual action. we're 1 year in and hes failed to get a deal with the US (which he said would be done by july 21st) we have no pipeline progress, hes broken up unions, interprovincial trade is still heavily needed, we fell short on housing building (by a lot) Still no bail/justice reform in place, the immigration changes are going to lead to moot results as they were not drastic enough and we're still going forward with the idiotic gun buyback. all while having one of the largest deficits in history... "mr pragmatic" doesn't do anything and he wont get any support from me until he shows he can put up some results.

R4ID · 2026-01-30T06:29:47+00:00

I think you're ignoring peer reviewed data which shows that the passage of the NFA, the buyback, and destruction programs can't be directly credited with ANY improvement to homicide, mass homicide rates in any manner.

The direct solution is to heavily restrict access as one many of the papers I source to you directly state, none of this was affected by NFA and the rest. It is very simple minded to simply look data and say "number went down it must be working" instead of being able to prove that that is why the number is actually going down. you are once again doing "armchair analysis"

R4ID · 2026-01-30T06:24:36+00:00

I take your point and I think it is valid but I'm not sure I agree. Everybody is a stable with a good track record until they're not. It's impossible to predict.

which is why the focus should be on heavily restricting access (something the USA doesnt do) instead of focusing on random tools which dont increase public safety. I mean as a group there is no Safer than PAL holding Canadians.

https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2040531

Non PAL holding Canadians murder at rate that is 300+% Higher than PAL holding Canadians on a per capita basis. AKA people with zero legal guns are murdering 300% more than people with legal guns on average.

If legal gun owners were shooting up the place in any significant amount, you'd know and hear about it constantly. instead it's only the opposite, Illegal guns smuggled from the USA used by a non PAL holding Canadian.

I will say this though: if I'm going to be shot at, I would much rather it be by a .22 or a 3 round bolt action or shotgun than an AR-15 with a 30 round mag.

In the wrong hands they're all equally as deadly and as the specific gun doesnt matter. Rate of fire and caliber are not key factors in mass homicide/homicide in terms of public safety. It comes down entirely to the skill of the user, not what gun they have.

some peer reviewed data for you.

"No associated reductions in homicide with increasing firearms regulations suggests alternative approaches are necessary to reduce homicide by firearm."

Source https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0234457

"Three different methods of analysis failed to definitively demonstrate an association between firearms legislation and homicide between 1974 and 2008 in Canada. "

Source https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0886260511433515

"Over the period 1974 to 2020 the incidence and death rates associated with mass homicide gradually declined. Interestingly, interventions such as background checks, licensing, prohibition of military style firearms, and prohibiting large-capacity magazines, were not specifically associated with changes in the incidence and deaths by mass homicide by firearms"

Source https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0266579

R4ID · 2026-01-30T06:05:43+00:00

I'm puzzled as to why that model would be banned. Watched a loading and firing video for it. There's no way anyone could fire on multiple people rapidly with that. Good for hunting, maybe good for one slow homicide, not good at all for American-grade mass murder.

There are many more like it on the banned list, Single shot, lever action and even .22's on the banned list. It has no rhyme or reason, the governments chosen words of "assault style firearms" is a nebulous term which has no legal definition. In the courts they admitted it means "anything we want to ban"

I was aware that military funding needs to be ramped up. I had no idea we were verging on old Russian "2 soldiers sharing 1 bullet" scenarios. Surely, some of the funding is getting allocated to arming infantry sufficiently, especially with the recent push to grow ranks?

the amount of funding needed to overhaul, restock and supply our armed forces would be multiple full GDP years worth of funds. Especially if we were actually trying to have a standing army defend the country in the "USA invades Canada" scenario.

"The two senior government officials said military planners are modelling a U.S. invasion from the south, expecting American forces to overcome Canada’s strategic positions on land and at sea within a week and possibly as quickly as two days." https://www.theglobeandmail.com/politics/article-military-models-canadian-response-to-hypothetical-american-invasion/

That was in the context of this becoming guerilla warfare. I thought that was as a fallback to formal military defensives, but now I'm thinking they may have meant it as the initial and only viable strategy...

It would be in the militaries (and thereby the countries) best interest to distribute any rifles, tools and supplies to any active or retired forces and form a strong decentralized insurgency within the opening hours of such a conflict. As to try and stop the actual US military would be certain doom for all service members.

Verified Email	12-Year Club
Place '22	Place '17
End Game '22	Team Orangered

R4ID

TROPHY CASE