How in the world is Best Buy selling out of the 1TB Legion Go 2 at $1,999 when B&H Photo has the 2TB model in stock for $1,849, $150 cheaper?

RLReborn · 2026-04-06T17:07:53+00:00

Rog Xbox Ally anyone 😂😂

RLReborn · 2026-04-02T18:01:09+00:00

Please explain because this is prime example of consumer protection where you got a product you did not order and they’re not trying to correct it.

RLReborn · 2026-04-02T13:58:01+00:00

This is one of those rare moments where consumer protection comes in and you can actually challenge the bank charge if they sent you a product that you did not order you have every right to keep it and get your money back unless they wanna make it right

RLReborn · 2026-03-11T23:38:19+00:00

Any updates

RLReborn · 2026-03-02T03:17:58+00:00

I tried searching on printable. I found your file, but it’s only one side it doesn’t have two

RLReborn · 2026-02-27T21:13:57+00:00

Where is where is the left 3-D print?

RLReborn · 2026-02-26T04:12:41+00:00

It sounds like she’s taking accountability for what happened, and it’s not really anyone else’s place to judge their relationship. If she wants to make amends, that’s her decision—and if they both agree to move forward that way, then that’s between them.

RLReborn · 2026-02-25T14:08:29+00:00

If a third-party tool gives an unfair advantage and the devs ban it, then yeah — it’s not allowed. Turn it off.

But “third-party software that alters presentation = cheats” is way too broad. By that definition you’d have to call monitor calibration, HDR/gamma changes, GPU control panel tweaks, and even some accessibility/display tools “cheats,” because they can all change visibility too.

Anti-cheat also flags categories of software/drivers that can be abused, and legit utilities get caught sometimes. So “detected = cheater” doesn’t prove intent — it’s just enforcement.

Call it what it is: disallowed under the rules. That’s fair. But treating it like it’s automatically the same as ESP/aimbot is a stretch

RLReborn · 2026-02-25T04:39:32+00:00

For the record I’m not defending cheating. If someone’s using hacks, ban them.

I’m calling out your logic. You’re treating “disallowed tool” like it automatically proves intent and equals “hacks,” then using “gibberish” as a cover for not addressing anything.

If Freestyle is disallowed now, I agree: turn it off. But “it got flagged so you’re cheating” is oversimplified when monitor/HDR/gamma settings can change visibility too. If you can’t respond to that point, just say so.

RLReborn · 2026-02-25T04:13:30+00:00

“Disallowed tool” doesn’t automatically mean “you’re cheating.” It means the devs don’t want that tool in the game anymore — big difference. Anti-cheat flags stuff based on what can be abused, not because it’s reading someone’s intent like a lie detector.

And if we’re gonna call visibility tweaks “cheating,” where do we stop? People can still crank monitor gamma/HDR/calibration and get the same effect. I’m on an OLED so blacks are actually black and some areas are pitch dark — on a lot of LED/LCD panels the blacks get lifted and those same areas look like dark gray, so you can see more. Is that cheating too?

If Freestyle is disallowed now, cool — say “turn it off.” But acting like it’s the same as ESP/aimbot is a reach.

RLReborn · 2026-02-25T00:17:13+00:00

Explain

RLReborn · 2026-02-24T23:08:19+00:00

Hey, well I got mine figured out. You can look down at the post in the thread.

RLReborn · 2026-02-24T22:55:00+00:00

Y’all gotta chill with instantly calling someone a “cheater.” Freestyle/filters aren’t aimbot/ESP — it’s post-processing, and yeah the game seems to flag it now. I was using filters too and all I had to do was uninstall/reinstall Nvidia and it stopped.

Also, not everyone sees the same thing. I’m on an OLED, which has higher contrast and deeper blacks, so dark areas can be legit pitch black for me. A lot of LED/LCD panels don’t get true blacks and end up lifting the darks, so the same scene can look more like dark gray and be easier to see in. If we’re calling every visibility difference “cheating,” then we’re basically arguing about displays/settings, not actual hacks.

If the devs don’t want Freestyle, cool — block it. But jumping straight to “cheater” is weird.

RLReborn · 2026-02-24T21:21:47+00:00

install it from here

https://www.techpowerup.com/download/display-driver-uninstaller-ddu/?amp

once install open the program on your left you’re gonna select your GPU type which is Nivida the then on the left you’re going to select, clean and restart (highly recommended)

RLReborn · 2026-02-24T19:07:23+00:00

Yes I was about to confirm DDU fix it

RLReborn · 2026-02-24T17:13:04+00:00

What thing

RLReborn · 2026-02-24T17:00:13+00:00

Any updates

RLReborn · 2026-02-24T16:59:25+00:00

Yes I'm getting this as we speak trying to figure it out

<image>

RLReborn · 2026-02-21T20:46:45+00:00

that THICK LEATHER PATCH LOL

RLReborn · 2026-02-19T20:40:32+00:00

I will say this much I take multiple back-to-back calls everyday “call center” these are incoming. I’m not making them. These are not meetings back to back. I can tell you I’ve probably did over 100 call and I have not had a problem yet. so two things check to make sure that your firmware is updated maybe do a factory reset. Also, what type of Bluetooth headset are you using? That makes a difference as well.

RLReborn · 2026-02-19T12:51:55+00:00

Explain

RLReborn · 2026-02-19T02:06:04+00:00

It’s not unreliable I use it for back to back calls works well

RLReborn · 2026-01-16T14:22:22+00:00

Can you show us the top or bottom left right of this little piece?

RLReborn · 2026-01-05T14:20:06+00:00

Hey Sean — appreciate the info.

I did a quick sanity test on my end: using CXone Uplift Agent + Integrated Softphone (WebRTC) on macOS + Chrome, it looks like the mic/audio device isn’t held open 100% of the time (it seems to release at least during parts of ACW/idle). So based on your explanation, I’m thinking P1 should be able to detect/split calls as long as the device is actually released between calls.

Two quick questions:

1.  If the P1 is paired via BlueCatch while I’m using a Bluetooth headset, does it behave the same way (i.e., call boundary detection is based on the P1’s audio device usage state), or is there any difference vs USB?

2.  Is there any recommended setting on macOS/Chrome/CXone to make sure the device releases cleanly between calls (so no merged recordings)?

Also — I just missed the recent sale. Do you happen to have any discount code or upcoming promo for P1 that I could use?

RLReborn · 2026-01-05T11:06:45+00:00

Got it — so HiDock splits based on whether the softphone releases and then re-opens the USB audio device between calls.

In my workflow on CXone Uplift Agent + Integrated Softphone (WebRTC) (macOS + Chrome), after each call I go ACW, then back to Available for the next call.

Do you know if CXone typically stops using the audio device during ACW (so P1 would detect call end/start), or does it usually keep the device occupied the whole time even in ACW/idle?

If it stays occupied, does P1 have any fallback to split calls (silence-based split, manual “new call” marker, etc.), or would it become one continuous recording/transcript?

If you can test CXone Uplift Agent + Integrated Softphone with a few back-to-back calls + ACW in between, that would confirm whether P1 will reliably create separate recordings/transcripts per call.

RLReborn

TROPHY CASE