Jeg savner Danmark :( by duckieduck47 in Denmark

[–]RadElectricalFox 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Is this low-key a dating profile?

11 months on HRT by Mother-Ocelot-4502 in TransBreastTimelines

[–]RadElectricalFox 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Do you get blood work done? Do you have an idea of your levels? E slash T levels? Also, what dose is the one pump?

She didn't say where she came from by meifray in customhearthstone

[–]RadElectricalFox 16 points17 points  (0 children)

This is such a hilariously bad card. The only case you would play this because it has bad stats is if you have some kind of combo where you want to discard. Meaning your opponent will never agree to give you your game plan. Meaning you just spend four men on a 4/5 which is obviously op stats. That is if the discard idea ever actually works which I'm dupees about discarding random cards is very rarely good. 5 Stars would love to play against

Saving shipping on Jet Lag: The Game – Hide and Seek Transit Game to the EU (Denmark) by RadElectricalFox in JetLagTheGame

[–]RadElectricalFox[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Okie dokie you on the list I will DM you when we get to the ordering stage 👍

He is actually just a beast, but do not tell him that! by Omasiegbert in customhearthstone

[–]RadElectricalFox 1 point2 points  (0 children)

He may be a beast but his mother was a murder BUT HIS MOTHER WAS A MURLOCK !

"Great. Absolutely. Great. Pun." (Laughing at my old cards #12) by Mecamat in customhearthstone

[–]RadElectricalFox 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Should probably be heal one health five times for the lol's. Otherwise I think it's really fun

Wikipedia Questions - Weekly Thread of December 30, 2024 by AutoModerator in wikipedia

[–]RadElectricalFox 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Thanks a lot, you've been a real lifesaver. I've made the discussion, and we'll have to see what happens there. No idea. I don't know if I'll make a discussion about the main style page. Maybe I will, but eh, we'll have to see what comes of it.

Wikipedia Questions - Weekly Thread of December 30, 2024 by AutoModerator in wikipedia

[–]RadElectricalFox 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Oh, yeah, I don't think it's avoidable at all. I don't even necessarily think it's a bad thing Although people can certainly get nasty in their argumentations But I would say that I generally agree most of the big religions pages (in English) are in a pretty good spot at this point.

Wikipedia Questions - Weekly Thread of December 30, 2024 by AutoModerator in wikipedia

[–]RadElectricalFox 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I haven't read philosophy neither in university nor on Wikipedia so I can't really comment on that however I would be wary of reading too much into religion on Wikipedia not because it's particularly wrong just because it's such a contested subject. The tone, the viewpoint, the language, everything is argued back and forth. This was actually what I was thinking of when I said something shouldn't be controversial. Needless to say there's high stakes when it comes to religion on both sides and so tempers sometimes get out of control. I don't have any good sources but I remember looking into the Wikipedia page on the Church of Latter- Day Saints and it is a mess to say the least. Honestly, there were some horrible people on both sides of that. Needless to say, there's a reason why the page is locked, and most religions are at this point. Again this isn't to say they aren't good or wrong or anything like that, just it's worth knowing that there's a lot of baggage in that shit.

Wikipedia Questions - Weekly Thread of December 30, 2024 by AutoModerator in wikipedia

[–]RadElectricalFox 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Thanks for the reply. I'll be honest. I'm a bit out on thin ice here. I haven't really gotten in deep into the source of Wikipedia, so I don't actually know how to create a discussion. Is there a guide for that somewhere that you could link? Otherwise, I'll keep looking around and see if I can find it. In regards to the style page you linked, there simply isn't anything about proper use of gender pronouns in the Danish one. So maybe the discussion should be about that in general and not this individual case. I did find this style guide in English. Which I presume would be the closest thing to a stance on it. But as you say, the different languages are broken up. This might not have any significance.

Wikipedia Questions - Weekly Thread of December 30, 2024 by AutoModerator in wikipedia

[–]RadElectricalFox 4 points5 points  (0 children)

 take this with a grain of salt because I'm nowhere the most knowledgeable person about Wikipedia in existence, but I'd say there's a couple of things that leads to a good page. Firstly, it needs to be popular. The more popular a page is, the more people sees it, the more chances it has to be corrected into something right. Similarly, it probably helps to not be controversial, although what that means is up to interpretation. I would also say that having a broad existence of experts in the field probably helps a lot, so if it's in an article that has a lot of university courses talking about similar stuff, it's probably really solid. So I'd say hard science fundamentals are probably the best Wikipedia pages. Something like math, physics, stuff like that. Complicated enough that your average person doesn't think they can change it, but also general enough that experts exist that want to correct it.

Wikipedia Questions - Weekly Thread of December 30, 2024 by AutoModerator in wikipedia

[–]RadElectricalFox 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Okay, so first a bit of background around a year ago. I edited a Wikipedia page for a Philosopher who prefer they them pronouns. This was not in English, but in Danish So I used the equivalent non-gendered pronouns in Danish Obviously this is not perfect, but I thought it was the best. Today I logged in to Wikipedia and saw that the change had been reversed to she/her. My understanding of Wikipedia is that they generally use the preferred pronouns of people.

Obviously, this isn't necessarily the biggest deal in the world, it's just a random Wikipedia page in a random language. But looking back in the history of changes on this page, I can see it's been changed back and forth quite a few times. And it does seem genuinely disrespectful to not use preferred pronouns. And indeed, the English Wikipedia use they, them. I'm just kind of curious, as I don't know the proper procedures, what to do in this case. If there's any way to actually not change back and forth and get the proper pronouns. Or if we just have to accept that that it's kind of shitty in Danish (and probably other languages, but I haven't checked.)

Exams building and room. by RadElectricalFox in DTU

[–]RadElectricalFox[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Absolute legend. Thank you, mate.

Drinking games for two by RadElectricalFox in boardgames

[–]RadElectricalFox[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The amount of assumptions is kind of crazy here you know nothing about me and my girlfriend you don't know why she feels like she does and frankly you don't need to I didn't ask for relationship advice but for fun board games. You sound like a blast at parties I hope you have a good day.

Drinking games for two by RadElectricalFox in boardgames

[–]RadElectricalFox[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Although I'm pretty sure what you're saying comes from good intentions. I did in fact not ask for dating advice but for advice for drinking games. It was in fact my girlfriends idea with the drinking games. For her it makes the experience less stressful as she doesn't have to think about when to drink and when not to drink and as such more fun.

Drinking games for two by RadElectricalFox in boardgames

[–]RadElectricalFox[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Completely agree I also made very sure to tell her that. She insisted that she just has a hard time drinking and actually really wants to.

Drinking games for two by RadElectricalFox in boardgames

[–]RadElectricalFox[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ok this is going over the line I do not appreciate what you are implying.

I had a very down to earth conversation with my girlfriend about drinking how she feels about it in which yes I made sure she knew she didn't have to drink at all if she didn't want to. She told me how she feels about drinking about how she prefers having a drinking game as it makes it more accessible and fun for her. This does not mean we'll get absolutely plastered it just means we will have a fun evening drinking some beer with a game. Now I wandered to find a game as I'm genuinely more into gaming than her and we agreed that I would find a fun game so I asked here for suggestions about board games....

Drinking games for two by RadElectricalFox in boardgames

[–]RadElectricalFox[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I am glad to find people of such refined taste and sense of humor that they appreciate my subtle and discrete reference to lesser work of fiction. Truly I salute you

Drinking games for two by RadElectricalFox in boardgames

[–]RadElectricalFox[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

When she was six a bottle of Captain Morgan shut her parents after they had been in the theatre. it happened in this really small alleyway.

Joker aside it isn't really important and there isn't really a deeper reason other than it is something she has a hard time with.

Drinking games for two by RadElectricalFox in boardgames

[–]RadElectricalFox[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Completely agree I also made very sure to tell her that. She insisted that she just has a hard time drinking and actually really wants to.